Can the WHO and the United Nations impose sanctions on your sovereign country for non-compliance?

Sanctions are a powerful instrument of political control and economic profit. One of the rare but critical topics relevant to the international campaign to #ExitTheWHO is whether the World Health Organisation and the United Nations can impose, influence or recommend specific sanctions. The sanctions could be implemented against countries that choose to not comply or cannot comply with International Health Regulations, the proposed new pandemic treaty, or other legislative attempts that curtail rights, freedom and sovereignty.

Kazuhiro

Kazuhiro Haraguchi – Japanese Minister Apologizes During Massive Protest In Japan [English Subs]

Today, the largest protest against the World Health Organization (WHO) began, with an opening speech by Kazuhiro Haraguchi, a former Minister for Internal Affairs and Communications in Japan and a current member of the House of Representatives. The massive gathering aimed to highlight several critical issues, as Haraguchi delivered a powerful and heartfelt address that resonated with many.

Sucharit Bhakdi

The way back to humanity

Today a big demonstration in Japan against the self-empowerment of the WHO: Prof. Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi addresses the demonstrators with the demand to defend themselves against inhuman medicine. He also supports Prof. Masayasu Inoue, Professor Emeritus of Osaka City University Medical School, in putting people at the center of medicine. He calls for a rejection of “self-amplifying mRNA products”, which can be very dangerous.

Aneel Hegde

Aneel Prasad Hegde | NARRATIVE #167 by Robert Cibis (EN)

Aneel Hegde has been fighting for decades for the self-determination of Indian farmers. Now he has become the first Indian parliamentarian to raise his voice against the superiority of the World Health Organization (WHO). Because there is a parallel between, for example, genetically modified BT cotton and the anti-Covid jabs. Both products are part of a hybrid exercise of power, which is symbolized by the presence of the late Donald Rumsfeld on the boards of Monsato and Gilead. The former company forces farmers to buy new seeds every year. This is because their plants do not reproduce on their own. The second company is the manufacturer of the ineffective anti-Covid drug Remdesivir, which the EU and many countries around the world bought in billions at a price of 2,000 euros per treatment. Both products destabilize the natural immune system, once in plants and once in humans.

WHO Part 2

Perspectives of the WHO: From Advisory Body to World Government? | Part II

Review of pandemic management and the protection of health, freedom and national sovereignty

Review of pandemic management: evidence of mistakes not to be repeated – Part 2

With speeches by following guests:

• Dr. Katarina Lindley – WHO is your doctor? 03:00-11:30
• Sen. Ralph Babet – Inquiry into excess mortality in Australia in association with COVID-19 vaccine campaigns 11:40-25:40
• Lawyer Liz Gunn – Excess mortality in New Zealand in association with COVID-19 vaccine campaig 26:00-52:00
• Prof. Masanori Fukushima – Vaccination mRNA for COVID-19 and unprecedented disaster: acute death and increased cancer mortality rate 54:00-01:19:00
• QUESTIONS – 01:19:00-01:25:00

WHO

Amendments to WHO’s International Health Regulations: An Annotated Guide

The Covid-skeptic world has been claiming the World Health Organization (WHO) plans to become some sort of global autocratic government, removing national sovereignty and replacing it with a totalitarian health state. The near-complete absence of interest by mainstream media would suggest, to the rational observer, that this is yet another ‘conspiracy theory’ from a disaffected fringe. 

The imposition of authoritarian rules on a global scale would normally attract attention. The WHO is fairly transparent in its machinations. It should therefore be straightforward to determine whether this is all misplaced hysteria, or an attempt to implement an existential change in sovereign rights and international relations.

”One Health”

A blueprint for taking over food chains and natural areas in the name of public health

According to the UN and associated agencies, nature and food chains are sources of pathogens with pandemic potential. To protect citizens from them, the ”One Health” approach has been developed: worldwide, the UN, the CDC, EU, RIVM, universities, corporations, and NGOs are working together to monitor and anticipate potential risks by coordinating collaboration at local, regional, national and international levels. Is this a blueprint for expanding power of the UN and WHO – allowing them not only to set global health policy in the event of crisis, but also to take control of food chains and natural areas in the name of public health