MWGFD: Gene-based “vaccines”. The pharmaceutical crime of the century?

7:43That was the Corona exit concept from January 2022 and the mask symposium from September last year. This is our first online symposium. Nevertheless, we are not media experts, and so I would ask you

8:08to forgive us for small mishaps. Let me introduce myself: I am co-owner, co-founder of MWGFD. My name is Ronny Weikl, and this organisation, MWGFD, stands for independent healing. It was founded under the patronage of Sucharit Bhakdi and has brought together critics of the Corona measures from five different countries. We have more than 18,000 registered supporters who support us with their help. Our aim is to inform people about the COVID measures. It was very important to us to be able to offer these talks not only in German but also in English, because the topic affects people all over the world. Numerous experts from medicine and law will speak to us and explain why the COVID vaccines, the so-called vaccines, gene-based drugs, are the pharmaceutical crime of the century.

9:43And you are all called upon to pass this message on to everyone. Yes, as viewers this evening we expect a lot from you. That also applies to the speakers, who have to be very brief, because we want to hear so many different speakers, and it is not easy for them to summarise their expertise in 10 to 12 minutes. And of course I cannot go into great detail. But all the effort is worth it, because we want to show how well informed each individual is in their field. Ultimately it is about nothing less than the survival of the fundamental rights we are fighting for, human dignity and our freedom as independent and self-determined beings. We are offering you a potpourri, the whole range of topics surrounding the so-called COVID vaccines.

10:56You can then explore individual topics in more depth by obtaining additional information, by downloading the accompanying materials we provide. We will do that free of charge in the next few days. We will now hear the scientific facts about the vaccines. That is the first part. The second part is the legal aspect. The question is: what do we have to do from a legal point of view? And in the third part of the evening we would like to talk about how we can support the people who have been harmed by the vaccines. Now one more piece of information. If you cannot follow the full six and a half or seven hours and have to leave for some reason, which would be understandable, you can of course watch this symposium or individual talks in a few days on our channel, where we will upload it soon.

12:01You can also find it on our website at MWGFD.org. And then I would like to point out the press conference we will hold on 15 March from 2 to 6 p.m. in Munich. More about that on our website MWGFD.org too. I ask everyone to stay with us. It will be very interesting. It is important information that you can use for your own benefit. Now for the explanation of why we always speak of "so-called" vaccinations: it has to do with the fact that these vaccines differ from what you are used to from tetanus vaccines etc. and other conventional vaccines. But you will hear more about that from our speakers. So whenever you hear vaccines or vaccinations, please always think of quotation marks, even if we don't say so explicitly every time.

13:18And we will go into this in more detail later on. I have one more thing to say. Our messages are addressed to everyone, to all people, vaccinated and unvaccinated alike. We are also addressing the vaccinated, not to frighten them; we are very glad that many vaccinated people have remained free of negative consequences. And we hope it stays that way. But we would like to show everyone, including the vaccinated, that by getting vaccinated they took a major health risk unnecessarily, because there was never any need to get vaccinated. And the vaccines, the vaccinations, never achieved what one would expect of a vaccination. For me it is still unbelievable that so many people accepted these gene-based so-called vaccines, although we warned against them from the very beginning.

14:25COVID vaccination was simply pushed through at any price by the string-pullers behind it. Please show picture one. Bill Gates was allowed to say on the main news that only a vaccine will save us and that this would have to be the biggest vaccination campaign of all time. He said that in the end we would vaccinate seven billion people. That could have been an eye-opener for everyone. That is why I called my pictures "eye-openers", because already at the beginning, at Easter 2020, it was clear. And John Ioannidis, probably the most renowned epidemiologist in the world, had shown that this new SARS-CoV-2 virus, in terms of mortality rate and dangerousness, is no more

15:33than a flu of moderate severity, and that although the virus had been made as dangerous as possible, as we now know. The reason is that people had an immunological foundation. I am sure that the people behind it all expected something different. John Ioannidis's analysis showed that mortality was three per million. And you can imagine why we are also outraged that even the vaccination of children was recommended to us. And that can only be described as perverse. And even at 0.9 per cent it was still a lower mortality than with the flu. Even among 70- to 90-year-olds there were only five deaths per thousand. So there was never any need for a vaccination, let alone compulsory vaccination.

17:08But what should have been another eye-opener? EU Commission President Ursula von der Leyen: 4.6 billion vaccine doses. The Commission President, Ursula von der Leyen. Please show picture 2. For 450 million EU citizens. That is 10 doses per EU citizen. Most of them from Pfizer-BioNTech. Now you see picture 2. So that cost European taxpayers 71 billion euros. And the whole thing was even approved by the European Court of Auditors, which with its logo even calls itself the guardian of the EU's finances. In politics or in the public broadcasters this of course caused no scandal, because it was communicated with these figures almost nowhere. Picture 3, please. Of all people, the New York Times is now suing the EU Commission, demanding that von der Leyen disclose her WhatsApp messages with which she personally set up the billion-euro deals with Pfizer CEO Bourla. But picture 4, please.

18:08As we know, she has of course already deleted them again, surely because of an acute lack of space on her phone. And the following figures, which I don't want to withhold from you, show that people were vaccinated against Covid quite vigorously in Germany and worldwide. So far, according to reports in the New York Times, about 5.5 billion people worldwide, that is 72.2 per cent of the world population, have been vaccinated against Covid. And in total, according to Bloomberg, that's a somewhat older figure from October 2022, 12.7 billion vaccine doses were injected. For me the whole thing is unimaginable in numbers. Picture 5, please. And if we look at the current vaccination status in Germany on the vaccination dashboard from yesterday, 27 February 2023, I don't know right now whether you are seeing the right picture, you can see that 64.9 million people in Germany, that is 77.9 per cent of the population, have so far received at least one dose, 63.6 per cent have their primary immunisation, that is two doses, 52.1 million people, 62.6 per cent, have already received a booster. And you wouldn't believe it: 12.6 million people, that is 15.1 per cent, received at least two boosters, so four vaccinations in total.

19:26Here, I think, one can actually already speak of addictive behaviour. And all the more so with the 1.4 per cent of Germans, I can't believe it, who already have five or more doses inside them. One small ray of light or glimmer of hope for us critics: 18.4 million people in Germany, that is 22.1 per cent of our population, are still not vaccinated. But it seems to be continuing. On the vaccination dashboard, could you show picture 6, please, you can see that in February, for example, thousands of people were still being vaccinated every day. On 17 February, 5,000 vaccine doses were injected in Germany. But now I have reached the end of my rather long prologue.

20:06There is simply so much on my heart that I want to share with you. Briefly, I would like to explain why you will see our MWGFD donation account shown at the bottom of your screen again and again during this event. That is because we, as the association MWGFD, are financed exclusively by donations. By the way, all of us members work unpaid, pro bono, because we see it as an obligation to our fellow human beings and to society. And all of tonight's speakers are also giving their talks without being paid. But there are many projects we finance, to name just a few. We finance most of the work of the pathologists' group and of Professor Arne Burkhardt, whom you will hear later.

20:45We have set up and maintain several hotlines for the vaccine-injured, as well as a therapist referral service through which we help people with vaccine injuries find a doctor who can help them. The new media portal, which gives people quicker access to various media, is also financed by MWGFD. And we have a heavily visited website, our own YouTube channel and a Rumble channel, through which we provide information on all important topics. A team of employed staff who, among other things, take care of answering the many enquiries that reach us every day. Our services and offers are of course available to everyone free of charge. And of course the logistics and organisation of today's event also have to be paid for, for example the costs of OVALmedia and of the staff working for us today.

21:37But don't worry, with this note we certainly don't want to take the last cent out of your pocket. And you can also contribute and do something good for us in many other ways. Any support, forwarding our information, your encouraging, constructive comments on our posts, your good thoughts and prayers are very valuable to us. Only those who can do so without it hurting them should feel called upon to donate. I would like to make one last point. We, the Society of Physicians and Scientists for Health, Freedom and Democracy, are offering many speakers in this symposium, including many who do not belong to MWGFD, the opportunity to pass on important information to their fellow human beings.

22:18We respect freedom of opinion and diversity of opinion as a sign of a free democratic basic order. And all speakers are of course themselves responsible for the content of their talks. The opinions expressed here do not therefore necessarily reflect the fundamental position of MWGFD or the opinion of every individual MWGFD member. But now it is time that I really stop, come to an end and hand over to our first speaker of the evening. We begin with part 1 of our symposium, which is headed: scientific findings and facts on Covid vaccination and on gene-based vaccines in general. Prof. Sucharit Bhakdi, the first speaker, the chairman of MWGFD, who will give the opening talk, really needs no introduction.

23:03He is one of the best-known protagonists of the Corona education movement worldwide, a whistleblower from the very first hour. As a specialist in microbiology and infection epidemiology, he was director of the Institute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene at the Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz for 22 years. Prof. Bhakdi will introduce us further to this important topic and also tell us what we all need to focus on now. We look forward to your address, dear Sucharit. Hello, dear human family. Unfortunately it is not over. The political narratives continue to be planted in people's heads by the media marching in lockstep. Anyone who thinks for themselves, who thinks differently and says so publicly, is defamed and punished.

23:53While our focus has meanwhile been steered to other topics, the vaccination madness continues. The vaccination commission still recommends the gene injection for children, and the WHO is working on a pandemic treaty that makes one fear the worst. We must unite across all national borders and stop the madness. Gene-based vaccinations are like the Trojan horse. Once they are accepted, the door is wide open for gene therapies of all kinds. For over two years they have been used mercilessly, with terrible consequences. The vaccination campaign is the greatest medical crime against humanity. It must be stopped. We are in a raging torrent leading into the abyss. Let us reflect together on how to reach the safe shore.

24:51That is the purpose of today's symposium. The worlds of science, medicine and jurisprudence come together today, and the talks span a broad field. 20 speakers will have their say. Each has 12 minutes of speaking time. Too little for boredom to set in. The evening will be gripping to the end. Stay with us! The attention of the world is currently focused in particular on the dangers associated with the production of the spike protein in the body. It is established that the gene sequences were created in the laboratory. The aim of the genetic manipulation was to generate spike proteins with gain of function, that is, with increased potential for danger. Questions surrounding this notorious spike protein, the how, the what for, the why, will occupy us intensively this evening.

25:54But I want to use the remaining minutes to address another topic that urgently deserves attention. For two reasons. First: it is planned that mRNA agents will be used widely in human and veterinary medicine. They are to replace all other vaccines. What a gigantic market for mRNA agents, whose production costs are a fraction of the production costs of conventional vaccines. We must not make the mistake of believing that replacing the spike protein gene with other genes removes the dangers of the injections. The mRNA vaccination train has already arrived in animals. Since there are no regulatory hurdles, the vaccinations are practically already being carried out under the counter.

26:50And in humans? Keep your eyes and ears open. mRNA-based agents are being developed not only against infectious diseases but also against cancer and cardiovascular diseases. Production facilities are springing up like poisonous mushrooms, some in the remotest regions of the world. We must stop the entire mRNA agenda. Dear friends, dear fellow campaigners, precisely this possibility exists here and now. Why, you will ask. Do you know what injected mRNA is packaged in? In lipid shells, the so-called lipid nanoparticles, LNPs for short. No LNPs, no mRNA agent. LNPs have unique properties that no natural substances possess. They protect the mRNA and enable the foreign genes to penetrate the body's cells. For the LNPs to acquire these abilities, unnatural lipids have to be added to them.

28:04These are fatty lipids made by human hands. Completely artificial. Completely against nature. Because, unlike naturally occurring fats, these molecules are positively charged. They are the notorious cationic lipids. But the inner world of a cell is negatively charged. Practically all cell functions are maintained by means of negatively charged molecules. Positively charged fat molecules will interfere and disrupt operations. And there is no known mechanism for breaking down cationic lipids or transporting them out of the cell again. With every booster vaccination they accumulate in our body. That bodes nothing good. And now please note: before Corona, cationic lipids were only permitted for research purposes.

29:06Use in humans was not permitted. The information sheets also said "Not for Human Use". Achilles had one vulnerable heel. The mRNA agenda has two. One of them is the criminal fraud by which the pharmaceutical industry swindled its way to official authorisation of the Corona vaccine. What fraud? Before an unauthorised substance is used, it is legally required that preclinical animal studies be carried out to guarantee its safety. BioNTech began developing the first Corona vaccine in January 2020. In May 2020 they declared in writing that the required preclinical studies had been carried out. That was of course a lie.

30:07For the simplest reasons of time, it could not have been true. Documents are now available to the world proving that the necessary animal studies were in fact never carried out. Not in 2020, not in 2021, not in 2022. On the basis of this fact alone, all purchase contracts with Pfizer-BioNTech would have to be annulled. The vaccine-injured would have to be able to sue the company for damages. Now the pharmaceutical industry could counter: no, the Achilles heel has not been hit, because the authorisations were granted by the authorities according to the rules. And because they, the manufacturers themselves, never gave any guarantee of the effectiveness or safety of their products. Fortunately there is the second Achilles heel.

31:02And that one cannot be missed. Because the second Achilles heel is the high toxicity of the cationic lipids themselves. In November 2021, 15 months ago, the authoritative, unassailable scientific study on this topic appeared. Injecting empty LNPs, empty packaging, immediately caused highly inflammatory tissue reactions in the mice at the injection site. The cause was the cationic lipids. When they were left out, the LNPs were harmless. When they were included, the toxic effects occurred immediately. Dripping these lipids into the nose caused severe pneumonia, which was often fatal. Now the counter-argument could come: humans are 2,000 to 3,000 times heavier than mice.

32:07Compared with the amounts humans are vaccinated with, the amounts in the mouse experiments were gigantically high. But consider this: when a hot needle is inserted into the muscle, the tissue burns on the spot. The hotter the needle, and temperature now equals dose, the greater the damage. There is no difference between human and mouse. A question for you, the kind audience: how high is the dose of LNPs, of cationic lipids, in the human vaccines compared with the doses administered in the animal studies? Are the needles in humans just as hot, less hot or even hotter than in the mice?

33:10What do you think? You have 5 seconds to think. The answer: in humans the dose is more than 10 times higher than in the mice. The needle is not merely hot, it is red-hot. Conclusion: the injection of any mRNA agent is grievous bodily harm. The injection of any mRNA vaccine is incompatible with the first ethical principle of medicine: do no harm. Dear human family, we can, we will and we must stop this madness.

34:09Thank you for these clear explanations and statements, dear Sucharit, and for your confident words at the end. I'll repeat them once more: we must, can and will stop this madness. We will do it. That is our obligation. And that is why we have come together this evening. I would just like to note briefly, our team, which has set up a control room in our kitchen, has just told me that on some channels the English translation was apparently shown on the German-language channels earlier, and that this obviously confused some viewers. I hope we can sort that out later and that it won't happen again. So please excuse this small mistake.

34:52But I'll move straight on to our second speaker of the evening. He too needs no introduction. He too spoke up early and is a whistleblower from the very first hour. Professor Stefan Hockertz is a toxicologist, pharmacologist and immunologist, currently living in Switzerland. He is also the owner of the company TPI Consult AG, which among other things advises pharmaceutical companies. He can also look back on his own research experience with mRNA technologies. Today he will show us the effects of these gene-based vaccines and explain why they are so dangerous. We are excited about your talk, dear Stefan. Yes, a very good evening to everyone who is listening to me. Thank you for inviting me to say a few things here.

35:41The first slide, please. Hello, the first slide please, if possible. I can't see it. Ah, wonderful. Thank you. I would like to pick up on what Ronny and also Sucharit said earlier. The Covid-19 vaccines are not vaccines. They are not classic vaccines, because they are gene-based. Next slide, please. And we now see what happens with these gene-based substances in the body. A genetic code is administered into the body. That is very, very decisive. And from this genetic code, Swissmedic here in Switzerland itself called it a blueprint in response to our enquiries, from this blueprint the body's cells are then made, in the area of protein biosynthesis, to first produce the active pharmaceutical ingredient, the API, as we call it, in some way.

36:40That happens in protein biosynthesis. Next slide, please. In protein biosynthesis you see a cell nucleus, and in the nucleus the mRNA is produced through transcription. That is a normal physiological process. And now this cell is raped. And I use the word raped quite deliberately. It is made to translate a foreign mRNA supplied from outside. That is, to insert it into translation and there produce a protein that does not belong in our body at all. And only that is the active pharmaceutical version. So, once again, what is injected is genetic material. And I am happy to repeat myself: I speak of gene therapy or genetic manipulation and, as a matter of principle, not of vaccination.

37:31Next slide, please. When I, as a toxicologist, am asked, or was asked in the past, can we now finally start carrying out animal experiments and testing a substance, my questions were first of all about quality. I don't want to say much now about what that looks like with these substances. That may come up again later. But there were also questions about pharmacokinetics. How does this substance actually distribute in the body? How do the mRNA molecules distribute in the body, and later the spike protein? And we were told very early on that it is injected into the muscle and stays there. Anyone who understands even a tiny bit about pharmacokinetics could only answer that with a smile.

38:20Ultimately we know nothing about release, uptake, distribution in the body, conversion or breakdown. And we also know nothing about excretion, so this point is completely unknown. And that is why, in earlier times, for example, I would not even have started animal experiments or any further experiments at all, because I know nothing about the pharmacokinetics. Worse, next slide please, worse regarding pharmacodynamics. In pharmacodynamics it is important to us to demonstrate the active substance of medicines, including vaccines or gene products. What profile of action is actually present? What mechanism of action? We know a little about that. We know how toxic the spike protein is.

39:08I'll say a few words about that in a moment. And what interactions with other molecules might exist. And here is a very, very important point. And allow me to stress briefly here that we do not know any dose-response relationship. Because, ladies and gentlemen, we do not know any dose. A few weeks ago Swissmedic, as the first official regulatory authority, informed us in writing, in response to an enquiry from Pascal Najadi, who is thankfully also taking part today, that while they know the blueprint, that is, the mRNA, they wrote to us precisely that they cannot tell us how much spike protein per kilogram of body weight, which is the unit we need as toxicologists and pharmacologists, is formed in humans. And that is of course a statement, that is practically, well, you could just lay down your work straight away. Because ultimately we learned from Paracelsus, Theophrastus Bombastus von Hohenheim, in 1540: the dose makes the poison; all things are poison.

40:24Only the dose determines whether something is a poison or not. And if, ladies and gentlemen, we don't know the dose at all, then we have actually already reached the end of the road here; there is no need to talk any further. So we do not know the dose of the spike protein, and so the pharmacodynamics, like the pharmacogenetics, remain unclear. Next slide, please. You all know that the spike protein is ultimately formed. By now everyone is talking about it. It is very important that, in the physiological reading of mRNA, the organism normally always gives us feedback on whether a protein is being produced correctly or not. So we know this; it is a wonderful act of creation.

41:10That is no longer evolution but an act of creation: that we know when a protein is right and when it is wrong. And if it is wrong, it is no longer produced. We do not have this information for the spike protein. And so, with a colleague from Stanford, I had to learn, and was able to learn, that not one spike protein is formed, ladies and gentlemen, but millions of different ones. And of course our immune system reacts to that. And that also overloads the immune system. Overloaded, like a [web shop] where you can order something. And then criminals come; compare it with a computer that has an access point, and bots. And they paralyse this computer because they constantly access it, because they constantly access the website and are thereby able to destroy this website.

41:59And that is a further point we have to bring into play: these control loops only work with proteins that are physiological. The spike protein is not physiological. In the second part, next slide please, I would like to go into which three macrosystems in our organism are attacked in particular. And that, ladies and gentlemen, is planned. It has nothing to do with it happening by chance; rather, we find that three macrosystems are attacked, namely, first, the psyche is massively attacked by the mRNA injections. Many of you know this and experience it in your own surroundings: people who have had this gene therapy, had to suffer it or wanted to, have changed psychologically.

42:49They feel the ineffectiveness. They are now also feeling, via other media too, the side effects, or actually the effects. And that of course immediately brings them to the question: how do I get rid of this injection again? I can offer you little hope of detoxifying the injections again, of eliminating spike proteins. As a pharmacologist I consider that almost impossible. And that is why we, all of us, all people, as the human family, are responsible for being there to strengthen the psyche of these people, to take them under our arm, to help them rebuild their psyche and to tell them that, if they believe in it, with God's help and with our help too, they can get through this burden.

43:37Besides the psyche, next slide, the nervous system is massively attacked. Next slide, please. Thank you. We know today that spike proteins, this is a story that goes back to 2004, there is literature on the topic, that spike proteins can fuse with membranes, are very membrane-affine, as we say. And so they are fusogenic and capable of destroying action potentials. While you are listening to me here, there is practically a firework going on in your head, an electrical firework. And this electrical firework refers to billions of cells constantly reconnecting with one another, to there being links, to your nerves working, so to speak, and connecting. And spike proteins are capable, dose-dependently, but unfortunately we don't know the dose, dose-dependently of damaging this transmission.

44:36We know that they are neurotoxic and thereby destroy action potentials. We see that in the side effects, which often have a neurotoxic background and therefore also interfere very strongly with people's well-being. Next slide. Besides the, you will have seen red letters, really remember them. A P, an N, and now you see an I. I stands for immune system, and I have brought a single example. I'll try to explain in the short time available what happens in the immune system, among other things. The spike protein is capable of forming antibodies. We know that by now, and we also know that there are two different kinds of antibodies, so-called neutralising and so-called binding antibodies.

45:22The neutralising antibodies do their job. They recognise the antigen, shown in colour at the top, at these Y-shaped ends there, and at the lower end there is a kind of antenna, and there the information is passed on. Those would be neutralising antibodies, and in the so-called binding antibodies, which we also have for reasons of preventing autoimmunity, this information downwards, that is, this antenna, is interrupted. Let me say something we see very often in our society: we recognise something as wrong, but we say nothing and remain silent. And that is exactly what the binding antibodies do, and Corona is able to recognise this escape mechanism and to produce binding antibodies in particular. That is something we already know from earlier Corona infections. Our organism too, by the way, and that is why it reacts with cytotoxic T cells. Next slide, please.

46:24So as a rule we react to a Corona infection with cytotoxic T cells and get through it relatively unproblematically after three to four days. In people who have now had a gene therapy, the immune system has been led down the wrong path, because they first produce, for a short period, two to three days are enough, binding antibodies, and only then switch over to cytotoxic T cells. And this period, the production of binding antibodies that recognise the foreign but do not pass the foreign on to the immune system, that is, give no further information outwards but quasi protect the coronavirus, this process we call antibody-dependent enhancement, ADE. And this ADE actually leads to people falling ill with Corona in the first place, even if they have been vaccinated, and in fact seeing more severe courses.

47:25And that, ladies and gentlemen, is really very terrible news. We know today, and we have evidence for it, medical evidence, that severe courses are caused, among other things, by the misdirection of the immune system through a gene therapy that is sold to us as vaccination. This ADE is in fact responsible for people going through an infection more severely, or seeing harder, more severe courses, than we would see if they were not vaccinated or not gene-treated. Next slide, please. If you now put together the three letters I have just introduced, you arrive at the topic of PNI, psychoneuroimmunology, a topic I have been working on for more than 20 years and which actually connects psychology, neurology and immunology.

48:24And I like to transfer this, you can see it in these three small spheres, to body, mind and soul, which must be in balance. And this gene therapy, and this is intended, ladies and gentlemen, pulls this balance of body, mind and soul apart and robs people of an incredible amount of energy. And I think we must give them this energy back. Last slide, please, a brief summary, and in this summary a small piece of advice as well. We know today that these Covid-19 vaccines, in quotation marks, we call them vaccines only because they are sold as such, offer no protection of others. Ladies and gentlemen, that is as if you go to a car dealership, want to buy a car and think this car is great, but it doesn't drive. The main task of a vehicle is to drive.

49:16The main task of a vaccine is to offer protection of others and protection of oneself. That means you don't fall ill and you interrupt a chain of infection. Neither happens. Then came the claim, it was said, and it's false, I was just able to show you that, that we would then not have such severe courses. That is one of the main statements. And that, ladies and gentlemen, would be the same as if the car salesman comes to you and says: yes, I know this car doesn't drive, but look at the great steering wheel, the great seats, the great paintwork. That no longer interests you. It's no longer decisive either, because the main task of this vaccination, or in this case this gene therapy, does not take place. That is why we see a situation here in which this gene therapy does people absolutely nothing but harm, no benefit at all.

50:03And if we do a risk-benefit assessment, we have only risk and no benefit at all. Now I have been worrying and frightening you the whole time. And I don't really want to do that. But in science it is important that we deal with these facts. And let me use the last minute or two, which I'm simply going to take now, to ask you: yes, inform yourselves. Get the information. Process this information. But do not be afraid. It is so decisive that we do not let ourselves be guided by this fear that has been imposed on us over the last three years, that we do not let ourselves be led by this fear, but that we, and whoever has seen my talks in the past, but that we are able, ladies and gentlemen, to show so much trust in God that ultimately we can walk on water.

51:02That means we can do more. We can achieve more if we are not anxious, if we have no fear. And we never have fear when we are well and fully informed. Thank you.

51:17We thank you, dear Stefan, for showing us the immunological effects of these gene-based vaccines so vividly. Thank you for your clear, convincing words. Thank you very much. We'll stay with the scientific facts, ladies and gentlemen. Hardly anyone in our ranks has studied the effects of the spike protein, souped up in so-called gain-of-function research, as intensively. You have already heard a lot about it from Mr Hockertz, Prof. Hockertz. But hardly anyone has studied and researched this souped-up spike protein as well as our next speaker, the human biologist living in Würzburg, Prof. Ulrike Kämmerer. I am very pleased that she is with us again.

51:58Today she even has two talks. Late in the evening she will report to us once more on the effects of the ketogenic diet, that is, possible self-help for vaccine injuries. Prof. Ulrike Kämmerer can be deployed on all fronts. She practically never says no when her help is needed for any tasks or projects. We are very grateful to you for that, dear Ulrike. But now, dear Uli, we look forward to your talk titled "Gain-of-function research: the spike protein as a bioweapon". Yes, wonderful. Let me see that I can share my screen right away for the corresponding slides.

52:39The topic was requested: gain-of-function research, the spike protein as a bioweapon. I have prepared a few slides on it. And in my view one of the most important is this one here. It brings together websites where you can read very nicely about the background from people who have much more expertise and experience in the field than I do. I can only recommend it to everyone. These slides will also be in the accompanying booklet, where the corresponding links will be. One is the site StopGoF.com, Stop Gain-of-Function. It was made by a Würzburg molecular biologist who very early on, together with the Hamburg professor Wiesendanger, drew up the so-called Hamburg Declaration.

53:30You can read it on the StopGoF home page. It is about stopping critical research in virology with these gain-of-function viruses. On the site he has also unpicked in extreme detail the causes, the circumstantial evidence, so to speak, for the gain-of-function, laboratory origin of the Wuhan-1 variant, but also of Omicron. So for anyone who wants to delve deeply into the molecular biology of how gain-of-function research is done and how such viruses can be created, that is the site for it. Another site, the second one, Dr. Biene on Substack.com. It is also about what we have known since the Pfizer leaks, so-called directed evolution. It describes how the whole thing works.

54:26That is, so to speak, a further extension of so-called cloning. And she also writes superbly, I can only recommend it to everyone, about Sahin's Project Lightspeed and where all the problems and damage are. So for lawyers and lay people listening: I think the way she wrote it is brilliant. Be sure to read it; then you see much more of what went wrong. And an English-language site, the bottom one, again describes very nicely, I'll show you this article in The Lancet too, how from the outset some, let me put it this way, scientists who sold their souls a little suppressed things, claiming that the virus could definitely only come from nature, and suppressed the idea that the whole thing came from the laboratory.

55:22Then further sources: a group or individuals not known in more detail, probably rather a group, calling themselves Chicky Leaks; they are very active on Twitter but also on Telegram and deal very well with all this evidence, and here there is a hashtag with a short sequence of bases. Among other things, that is a really striking indication of gain-of-function research in connection with SARS-CoV-2. It is a purely bacterial sequence that exists neither in other viruses nor in humans nor in other mammals. It points very explicitly to cloning with plasmids having been done here, and that is the hashtag included there. Further papers, which I'll show in a moment, are above all the works of Segreto, where a great deal is also summarised.

56:18Gain-of-function was a topic that came up fairly quickly at the beginning, and then the so-called Fauci emails were leaked in the USA, and what is interesting is: Mr Fauci probably had a very active weekend; that was here on the 1st, you'll see it in a moment, on 2 February, hundreds of emails go back and forth, and one of the important ones is from a Kristian Andersen. Andersen is also a gain-of-function person, a virologist, and he wrote relatively early that this sequence seemed a bit odd to him. He said "potentially looked engineered", and then he lists others, and he himself thought that the genome was not consistent with an evolutionary theory, that is, with an origin in nature.

57:12So straight away there was someone working very closely with the NIH who said immediately: oh, something is wrong with this sequence. Interestingly, however, in March he himself then published a paper claiming he could show that the SARS-CoV-2 virus definitely did not come from the laboratory. On 2 February the email lines apparently ran hot; there were also large group meetings, in which Mr Drosten took part among others; all of that is known from these emails. The reason was the excitement: there was a so-called preprint from an Indian group, still retrievable via this DOI, as withdrawn, and they explicitly and very nicely demonstrated that the spike protein has four sites for inserts here that definitely do not belong there and that also sit at very exposed points on this upper side, the side with which the virus's spike protein can bind to cells, conspicuously pointing outwards.

58:23These are three parts from the so-called gp120 of HIV, with which HIV can dock onto T helper cells; these are the so-called receptor-binding domains, they are attached here, and then the so-called furin cleavage site was immediately conspicuous too, which in this form had actually already occurred in HIV. There were a number of emails about that too, and it was not about "oh God, what is this, what can we do about it"; the reaction was immediately: we have to wall this off. Walling off means in any case, as one email said: hopefully someone can be found who can look at this study and say there are methodological errors in it, so that we can say it's all nonsense. So that was the first reaction, but the NIH also immediately received emails from outside from normally thinking scientists, let's call them that, who said: oh dear, if there is something to this, we have a huge problem here, and it must be investigated immediately.

59:35Yes, these are all, as I said, leaked emails; you can look everything up. But no, it was not taken seriously; it was said it can only be a natural virus; public articles were placed immediately, it all happened very quickly, even before the weekend, saying that this lab virus was all a conspiracy theory. And the decisive thing in the scientific sphere was a statement in the highly respected journal The Lancet, organised by Peter Daszak, also signed by Mr Drosten, in which a not scientific but

1:00:20condemn in the strongest terms the conspiracy theories. Other papers kept saying no, no, none of this can be, but the indications accumulated very early on, and it is always about this region; it is a region where the so-called furin cleavage site is, and there are also some other nice cleavage sites or other amino acid sequences that give this spike protein the function, as if you have a large locking system, of the master key. And this master key cannot, like normal coronaviruses, only bind to the ACE receptor or have other binding sites; rather, this SARS-CoV-2 typically has only this insert, which is found in no other beta-coronaviruses but is found in a human epithelial sodium channel, which means that if the virus has very strong similarities here, antibodies can bind that later attack the cell's own important sodium channels.

1:02:02Here again a huge comparison sequence, and only the Wuhan virus has this insert, and that is extremely conspicuous; it cannot arise like that in nature. So there are very many indications, very early on, that something is wrong with the sequence here, and a very decisive summary was published by Ms Segreto in

1:02:42protein, protein, and that is the coding gene region, and precisely this sequence is a patent of the company Moderna, and it is already very unlikely that of all things a patented gene sequence should suddenly turn up in a naturally arisen virus. Overall there is a so-called motif here made up of various amino acids, and the whole motif actually has a homology to the toxin of the venomous snake, the king cobra. Then we again have the sequence that enables docking onto the neuropilin receptor, also very unusual for coronaviruses; we have a so-called inserted proline that changes the 3D structure so that this furin cleavage site is more easily reached by the host enzymes, and here too, through the exchange of one amino acid, the effectiveness of this cleavage site is increased. That all these functions, these multiple functions, arose in nature, and this is only a small area of this spike protein that I want to show, is practically ruled out; that means it can really only have arisen, together with other sites that have been found, through laboratory work. What does this now mean for the vaccination?

1:04:12The concern was that a deadly virus had arisen here; we know that this is not the case. The spike protein in the wild-type virus, so to speak, the circulating virus, does have considerable potential for danger, but you have to know that anyone with a good immune system can neutralise this virus, because there are

1:04:50[unclear], sorry, in the membrane proteins, and they are extremely similar to ordinary cold coronaviruses, which our immune system usually already knows. That means that in the vast majority of people there was prior immunity that could actually neutralise the virus, apart from cold-like illnesses. And in those who had a poor immune system, or who quite simply had bad luck, where the virus really got into the circulation, this engineered spike could indeed show its potential for danger. But normally, as I said, an infectious virus does not get into the circulation, that is, a respiratory virus does not get into the circulation, nor into the heart, brain and other organs. What makes the so-called vaccination so dangerous? Precisely this original engineered spike protein; that is what is encoded both in the vector vaccines, AstraZeneca and Janssen, and above all in the modified RNA-lipid mixtures, BioNTech-Pfizer and Moderna. It is formed in extremely large amounts in the body and does not remain at the injection site, as many people were always told, but distributes itself everywhere in the body and does damage, damage everywhere, because at protein level it corresponds exactly to the Wuhan-1 version, which has long since practically died out in nature, with all its toxic properties, and so everywhere, and the pathologists find this, Mr Burkhardt will surely

1:06:25show it, it can cause damage everywhere in the body. Can it be that some bats living thousands of kilometres, no, a thousand kilometres from Wuhan suddenly became infected with a virus that they then transmitted to humans, with a virus that is optimally adapted to humans with maximum potential for harm? Or is it not, on the basis of the evidence, very, very, very much more likely that this is a laboratory product? And in this context one will hopefully at some point be able to get hold of the experts who must know explicitly about this tinkering with the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Here is Ms Shi Zhengli, the so-called bat woman; this man here, I think, everyone in the German-speaking world knows; this is the organiser. So we have a very good cooperation here between Peter, who works very closely with Fauci, European researchers and Asian researchers. The probability that it is a laboratory virus corresponding to a gain-of-function type is certainly almost 100%; which laboratory it comes from, I would say, we really cannot determine.

1:08:04Just briefly here: there are, by the way, two such biolabs in Wuhan, not just one, and this virus also turns up much earlier, so it may very well have arisen in some other biolab somewhere in the world; it doesn't necessarily have to

1:08:24that was briefly on the topic of gain-of-function. I can only recommend everyone to read up on it on the sites I presented, and thank God it is increasingly coming into the mainstream too that this virus must come from the laboratory. I don't find it surprising at all, because in virology people really do work with such viruses; that is standard, it has to be,

1:08:54these viruses have to be worked on; in this case it was just a not exactly helpful bit of cloning, yes. Thank you very much. Yes, warm thanks, dear Ulrike, for these very vivid explanations of the enormous potential for harm of this spike protein, whose no longer controllable production in the body is then cranked up by the vaccinations. One doesn't even want to imagine the malicious sophistication the creators of this spike protein displayed; a lot of malicious brainpower went into it. I like to compare these gene-based Covid vaccines with a software program that is advertised to you in a computer shop as a great antivirus program. As soon as you have installed it on your computer, you discover that you were deceived, because it unleashes its no longer controllable effect by destroying the hard drive.

1:09:53That's roughly how you can imagine it. Thank you again. Most vaccinated people, as you can see everywhere, were by the way never properly informed about any risks or side effects, whereby, correctly, as we have now been able to learn from the talks by Professor Hockertz and Professor Kämmerer, we must clearly speak of effects of the gene-based vaccines. They are not side effects; they are effects. To lighten things up a bit, I will now present quotes every now and then from the official Covid-19 vaccination information leaflet of the Bundeswehr, the German armed forces, titled Vaccinations and the Duty to Tolerate. I have rather homed in on it because it contains so many downright unbelievable false statements and

1:11:15supposedly informative explanations about Covid vaccinations in the official information leaflet of the Bundeswehr medical service on vaccination and the duty to tolerate. As a doctor I am shocked, and after everything we have now heard about the effect of the so-called vaccinations, they surely sound cynical to our ears. Let me read it out briefly, and I ask for picture 8, what is written in the official Bundeswehr information leaflet on the question of what is actually

1:11:48The composition of mRNA vaccines often leads to heated discussions and a flood of misinformation online. This unsettles people and stands in the way of effectively fighting the pandemic. But what is really in the mRNA vaccines? Do they really contain questionable ingredients? Spoiler: no. As I said, official Bundeswehr text. As is well known, choosing the right ingredients and their quality play a decisive role in food; a little too much or too little, ingredients that aren't fresh or even the wrong spice can spoil the taste. In a Michelin-starred restaurant, no dish leaves the kitchen without the head chef checking its quality first. It is similar with vaccines. Strict quality controls, criteria and checks as well as clinical trials are required before they may be administered to a person. You can deduce how true that is from the talks so far. And picture 9 please: about the mRNA you can read, I quote: it can only read information from the DNA but cannot insert any information there. We know that too; it has of course been refuted by now. Therefore, according to the Bundeswehr leaflet, the mRNA vaccines do not change human genes. The mRNA components are completely broken down by the body and do not remain in the cells. And because we have just heard so much from Professor Kämmerer and Professor Hockertz about the

1:13:12dangers of the spike protein, which is of course then formed by the vaccination, what does the Bundeswehr medical service write about this? Picture number 10, please: the spike protein alone is harmless; only as a whole is the virus functional and dangerous. Well, you were just paying attention to Professor Kämmerer and Professor Hockertz and actually know the quality of this statement. So it is a scandal with what cheap vaccine propaganda our soldiers were informed here. But now I would like to move on to the next topic. The next speaker, together with his team, has made a special contribution to exposing the dangers of the gene-based so-called vaccines. This team also includes our pathologist Prof. Walter Lang and the human biologists Prof.

1:14:04Ulrike Kämmerer, whom you have just heard, and Prof. Werner Bergholz, whose talk you will hear in about three quarters of an hour. We at MWGFD are of course proud to have these four as fellow members. Prof. Arne Burkhardt, a pathologist from Reutlingen, is the leader and initiator of this group. The team has meanwhile examined histopathologically the tissue samples, I believe I am correctly informed, of over 80 people who died in temporal connection with the vaccination, and in doing so has brought sensational results to light, which Prof. Burkhardt will report on shortly. The sensational findings are unique worldwide and are attracting great attention internationally. To my knowledge, even in people who died more than a year after their last vaccination, masses of spike protein could still be detected in the damaged vessel walls and tissues that were the cause of death. But Prof.

1:14:56Arne Burkhardt, pathologist from Reutlingen, will now give you the details in his talk titled: The results of the pathology conference as an important piece of the puzzle in proving the crime. We look forward to your report, dear Arne. And I also see Walter Lang, Prof. Walter Lang, sitting in the background. I'm very pleased about that.

1:15:19Yes, yes, first of all I welcome you very warmly here, from our laboratory, where two technical assistants are still active at the moment operating the embedding and immunostaining machines that will run shortly. So at the moment we are all gathered here as a team. But it was not always like this; in March 2021 we, or rather I, began alone. I was asked whether I would be willing to look at some autopsy cases as a second opinion, where the relatives did not believe in a natural death because the death had been unexpected, sudden and in connection with this messenger RNA vaccination. And the things we then saw were so disturbing that I very soon looked around for some fellow campaigners who could confirm our results, and we then presented these results at a first pathology conference in September 2021. It was really an appeal to colleagues in pathology to follow up the traces we had seen. That met with a great response abroad, less so in Germany, but there are a few pathologists in Germany too who are active here as fellow campaigners and have also helped us with the technical problems. Now, the clinical pictures, or the organ and cell changes, that we

1:17:11presented at the time have meanwhile partly been published scientifically and confirmed by others, for example myocarditis, which evidently plays a role in a large number of deaths after and with vaccination. Today I cannot describe the individual organ damage in the time available; just on Saturday I gave a talk in which I presented these changes over almost three hours. What I wanted to show here is that we were and are on the trail, so to speak, of the spike protein, the essential toxic factor of this so-called vaccination. And if the first pictures could now be shown, I sent pictures, yes. So first of all it was clear to us that if we wanted to pin down the damage we see in organs and cells and connect it with the

1:18:34demonstrate where it is formed. And that is the unique situation: here a toxin is not injected from outside or given via food; rather, the body itself produces a poison, and we can

1:19:04the mechanism: it is about visualising certain substances in the cell, in the tissues, by binding antibodies, and finally an antibody that contains a dye, in this case a brown dye. You see at the top right the two cells from a nasal swab, and you see here that

1:19:34that is the spike protein. Next picture. Yes, first of all we were then actually able to confirm that what the pharmaceutical companies claim is true, namely that the spike protein is actually formed in the muscle cells, here the muscle fibres from the deltoid muscle, and you see these small fine granules; that is the evidence of spike protein in these muscle cells. But it was also clear to us from the outset that of course such an injected substance, whether injected directly into vessels or into the interstitium, ends up in vessels at some point, and the next picture now shows where it ends up next, namely in the capillary. You see this brown-marked capillary, which at one point is outside the image plane, and at the very bottom right you see the capillary in cross-section, and you see it is closed off by endothelial cells, the lining of the capillaries, which are forming spike protein here and are clearly swollen. In the surroundings these vacuoles; that is fatty tissue from which the fat has been dissolved out.

1:21:04The next picture then shows further that it also goes into larger vessels; these are arterioles, and you see at the top left a detection of the spike protein, and you see that the endothelium, the wallpaper-like lining of these arterioles, is clearly marked brown, and smaller vessels in the surroundings show this marking too, as well as individual clearly positive cells, myofibroblasts in the vessel wall, and then the same vessel in cross-section here at the bottom right. Here we have visualised the nucleocapsid; it was already mentioned in the previous talk that only the virus expresses or produces this nucleocapsid, and that is why it is possible to distinguish between vaccine-induced spike protein production and spike protein production in the context of a real virus infection, and I think this picture is convincing.

1:22:21Next picture. Yes, where does it go from there? Here we now have a local lymph node, armpit, and you see the lymph node on the right, and in particular in the so-called marginal sinus we see very many clearly marked cells. We also see individual vessels marked outside the lymph node, on the left side, and in particular, and this is a very essential finding, you see an arteriole here, and you see that the endothelium here is expressing spike protein very massively and is partly destroyed. According to our findings, angiotoxicity, or angiopathy, caused by the spike protein is a very essential mechanism of damage, and capillaries and vessels exist in almost all organs, except the teeth and the lens, and accordingly it is the common denominator for all these organ, or for most of the organ damage, that we

1:23:48is actually also detectable in the spleen; here we have these central arterioles with the lymph follicles around them, and they are essentially negative, but then in the so-called red pulp these strongly marked cells; a large proportion of them are probably monocytes, macrophages, others are lymphocytes. The next picture then shows further spread of the spike protein, namely in the brain. Here you see a small vessel, and you see that both the cells of the vessel, the endothelium, are marked, but also individual cells in the surroundings, inflammatory cells, and evidently under certain circumstances the blood-brain barrier can be overcome here. Next picture.

1:24:44Yes, and then it is not only the small vessels, the capillaries and arterioles, that are affected, but very essentially also the body's main artery, the aorta. And the next picture, please. Yes, and here at the top we again see the endothelium, the lining, marked as a line, and then below it in the intima, which is largely normal here; this is a 39-year-old man who did not die of an aortic rupture, so he died of another cause, but we see that here in the endothelium the myofibroblasts and the elastoblasts, which form the elastin of the vessel wall, show clear cytoplasmic marking. And next picture: in a total of five of the cases examined, this led to an aortic rupture. Here first once more the fact that in the area of this intimal lesion, where the endothelium is destroyed, a thrombus can then be deposited, which we see on the right side, and you see the inflammatory infiltrates at the boundary, which show a somewhat weak but nevertheless clear marking for spike protein. Next picture.

1:26:21Yes, and this is now an aorta from a patient who died after the vaccination of an aortic rupture, that is, a bursting of the body's main artery, and on the far left you see the still intact wall, and then, if you move further to the right, you slowly see the vessel splitting into two halves, and there is a dark, black material in between; that is a haemorrhage, and the patient died of this haemorrhage, and we have a total of five such cases of

1:27:09that this aortic rupture, that is already the picture after next, but it's okay, that this aortic rupture is accompanied by strong expression of spike protein in the surrounding cells. Now, this vascular damage is probably also responsible for at least part of what we call sudden adult death syndrome, abbreviated SADS, that is, sudden death without a conventionally identifiable cause. As a rule, an arrhythmogenic heart failure is then found at autopsy, but the connection to the vaccination that took place beforehand is rarely made, and the fact that one speaks of a syndrome here means that one somehow sees a common cause in these cases.

1:28:08And what did we find? We think that at least some of these sudden deaths are caused by vascular damage to the coronary arteries. Here too, as in the aorta, we have focal medial necroses with swelling and narrowing of the lumen; we have spike protein expression in

1:28:33infiltrates, especially macrophages; we have T-lymphocyte infiltrates and a myofibroblast reaction, and, very decisively, a pronounced lymphocytic perivasculitis in the vasa vasorum, the vessels that supply the vessel. And these cushion-like swellings, which I will show you in a moment, could in our opinion, or are in our opinion, in some cases the cause of sudden cardiac death, in which, because of the speed of events, no necrosis can form any more, and there is the term acute coronary syndrome for this. The next picture now shows such swellings. You see here the cross-section of a coronary artery, and if you look at the bottom left, you see roughly what it probably looked like before the vaccination, that is, no atherosclerosis and a proper layering, and both towards the top left and especially on the right you then see these cushion-like deposits, cystic medial necrosis, as it is called. And very important: these are changes that do not affect the intima, where atherosclerosis manifests itself, but the deep media, and this is a 48-year-old woman, so it would already be very unusual for such atherosclerosis to manifest itself here. The next picture then shows the section from the lower right part of the coronary artery, and here you see why

1:30:21it is called cystic medial necrosis, because these dying cells are then cystically inflated, and the next picture then shows, the next picture please, that we actually also see this immunohistologically at the bottom left. You still see the weakly and non-specifically stained necroses, cystic necroses, but then in the upper half the specifically and very clearly stained cells expressing spike protein; these are macrophages on the one hand, but also myofibroblasts. Next picture. Yes, then here we have the immunologically active cells,

1:31:18T lymphocytes, which are there specifically for cellular defence; we don't normally find them in this form in arteriosclerosis. Next picture. Then we also find spike expression in myocardial cells that have died or are dying; here quite nicely at the top right the normal myocardial fibres and here the circumscribed necrosis. Next picture.

1:31:57Yes, and then we have, and these are findings that may not be so significant for the occurrence of death, but which do have significant implications for the long-term effect of the vaccinations, these findings here,

1:32:20a 28-year-old man, and you see, for those who know about this, a clear disturbance of spermatogenesis. You have these clearly spike-marked large cells in the lumen, that is, where they don't actually belong; they are normally located only basally, and I

1:32:49the picture. Then we find it in the prostate, so it is to be expected that this spike protein is also present in the seminal fluid. Next, in the ovary; unfortunately we don't yet have many samples from young female patients where the ovary was also removed for examination, but you see here that spike protein is present, especially in vessels.

1:33:29Next, the endometrium, here again the double visualisation with the nucleocapsid at the bottom right and the spike protein at the top left, and you see that here too there is marking in the area of the endometrium, and one can think long and hard about the implications. And the decisive thing, a finding we were able to make just last week, now in the next picture, is the detection of spike proteins in the placenta. And here you see first the villi, and you see that they are marked brown, the cytotrophoblast and the syncytiotrophoblast. This is a stillbirth in the 37th week of pregnancy, vaccinated twice with Comirnaty, the last time ten days before conception, so here apparently expression of spike protein even nine months after it entered the body in this case. Yes, and the next picture shows that it is also detectable in other parts of the placenta. Here we have the amniotic cavity at the top and the lining of the amniotic cavity by the amniotic epithelium, and I think you can all see that it is clearly marked. Then comes the mesodermal chorionic plate, which is clearly not marked, and then comes the trophoblast at the bottom, which again shows clear marking.

1:35:12Next picture, or was that already the last one? Yes, that was already the last one, and I think these last pictures in particular are a good transition to the next talk, because that is about fertility, which apparently suffers under or after the vaccination. And yes, I greet you all once more on behalf of the staff of this laboratory. As I said, we are still at work here and are following the presentation with great interest. Thank you very much.

1:35:46Thank you so very much, dear Arne, for this fascinating presentation and for your great work at your institute in Reutlingen, dear Arne, dear Walter, and of course thanks also to your whole team of staff, whom we saw again and again in the background. As a gynaecologist I was particularly fascinated by your explanations of spike formation in the reproductive organs too, in the testes and ovaries and also in the placenta; it is simply shocking. In the transition to the next speaker, I would like to take the opportunity to briefly show the MWGFD donation account once again; that would be picture number 11, please.

1:36:29I have already mentioned that most of the funding of the pathology conference, that is, of the pathology working group around Professor Arne Burkhardt, comes via MWGFD. We had to purchase expensive equipment, and wages are also paid for staff. We are therefore grateful for your continued financial support. The next speaker is my MWGFD colleague and also professional colleague Dr Christian Fiala. He is a specialist in gynaecology and obstetrics and also a doctor of general medicine and tropical medicine. He too is a great educator on Corona, especially in his home country of Austria. Today he will speak on the effects of Covid vaccines on fertility and pregnancy. But before I hand over to him, I would like to show you once more, dear viewers, what Bundeswehr soldiers are told about this. You still have Professor Arne Burkhardt's explanations in your ears, so I

1:37:30that would be the official information leaflet. You can read it on the internet, and under vaccine myths it says: pregnancy ruled out, question mark. The Covid vaccination has no negative influence on fertility, no influence on the future development of the placenta or its course or the course of an artificial pregnancy. And then the

1:38:00result: the Corona vaccination can even improve sperm quality. Wow, the male soldier naturally thinks, I must have this injection right away. But then a small, minimal restriction is added; it goes on to say: however, this has not yet been clearly validly confirmed and needs further research. Poor German Bundeswehr. May I

1:38:30hand over the talk on this topic to my dear colleague Christian Fiala? I'm curious, dear Christian, whether you can confirm this in your talk. Christian, I just need to, now I'll switch myself off. I wish. Yes, good evening, everyone. I am very pleased; it is a great honour to be able to contribute something to finding the truth in such a circle. And the question of fertility and pregnancy is, I believe, symptomatic of what is being sold to us here as Corona vaccination. Because of the short time I can only go into the many, many data superficially or in summary, but I have added links for all statements where you can find further information, and the slides I am presenting now are available for download on the MWGFD home page; anyone can download them. That means you don't have to take notes. A very brief introduction: I not only have long clinical experience but also a PhD in scientific work; I conduct studies myself, have published a fair amount, and can read and interpret scientific studies and above all find the errors and problems in them.

1:40:12Some of what I will present can also be found on the home page of the Initiative for Evidence-Based Corona Information, initiative-corona.info. And with that I would like to get straight into the topic. The first slide, please. Contergan: if you say something on this topic, you practically have to start with Contergan, thalidomide, because that is what it's about; it is really the original sin of drug approval. Back then it changed a great, great deal. A brief comment to the control room: you have shown the last slide, but I would like to start with the first slide, if you could perhaps switch that. Contergan can be described as the original sin of drug approval, so to speak. A great, great deal changed back then. It was actually the biggest drug scandal in German history, as even the Deutsches Ärzteblatt wrote. In 1957 a sleeping pill and sedative was introduced without adequate testing in pregnant women, and because of aggressive marketing it quickly became the most consumed medicine in the then West Germany. It was advertised, and this too is reminiscent of current marketing, as harmless and completely non-toxic. Four years later came the withdrawal from the market. In Germany about 5,000 people were harmed, with malformations of the arms and legs. You see here one of these children who were

1:42:03born at the time; this too is reminiscent of the current situation. Why did it take four years instead of taking it seriously? This was then dealt with, and there was a very important lesson from this scandal, namely that all new preparations must be thoroughly tested, especially in pregnant women, and that every suspicion of harm must be taken seriously and would immediately lead to a ban on further sales. We

1:42:56actually, that this is a manifold multiplication of the drama, of the scandal of that time. But one thing at a time. Professor Hockertz already addressed this fundamental difference between a classic vaccination and the Corona vaccination earlier. Here again as a reminder, the next slide please. What is a classic vaccination? A weakened or killed pathogen is introduced into the body, and the immune system learns to recognise and destroy this stranger, this intruder, and remembers from the antigens, the identifying features, what this intruder looks like. Next slide: with the current vaccination, however, it is not a killed pathogen that is introduced into the body but, as I said, the blueprint for this identifying feature.

1:43:52This leads to healthy body cells producing this foreign identifying feature. That would be like painting the number plate of another city on your car, or, in a war, painting the enemy's identifying mark on your own tank. This leads to the immune system suddenly destroying this healthy, endogenous cell

1:44:24like a foreign intruder. That means the immune system is being misled, deceived here, and healthy, endogenous cells are falsely labelled billions of times over and destroyed by the immune system. That means this Corona injection is de facto a deliberately triggered autoimmune destruction of a very, very large number of one's own healthy body cells. Next slide. Very interesting in this context is what the manufacturer, Pfizer-BioNTech, says in the product information on the subject of fertility and pregnancy. I am presenting the product information from August 2021, that is, from the start of the rollout, and this is the new, updated version of this product information. And at the start, at the market launch of this injection, Pfizer itself writes: there is only limited experience with use in pregnant women. So a preparation is introduced, and the manufacturer itself says there are hardly any data, and it is also not known whether it passes into breast milk. What Pfizer did was a rat experiment, supposedly with about

1:45:4744 rats, in which they looked to see whether objectively verifiable changes occurred, and the manufacturer itself says not much changed in the rats. On the basis of this absolutely inadequate, scandalously inadequate data, the manufacturer then received only a so-called conditional authorisation. Conditional means the regulatory authority, the European one, said: yes, data are missing, both on safety and on effectiveness, and the manufacturer must obtain these data within the next two to three years. So in the authorisation procedure a preparation receives authorisation although it is clear that the necessary data on effectiveness and safety are missing, and the manufacturer is then required to submit the data actually necessary for authorisation within the next two to three years. This reduces the authorisation procedure itself to absurdity, because we have the authorisation procedure so that these data are available before a preparation is administered to people. Next slide, please. What did the manufacturer then do? As I said, I can only present individual data here. For example, they looked at, we heard about this earlier, these lipid nanoparticles, LNPs; these are very, very small fat globules in which this blueprint, this mRNA, is packaged and protected, and Pfizer-BioNTech then looked in an animal experiment at how they distribute, and our former Austrian

1:47:39health minister [obtained] a study that Pfizer submitted to the Japanese health authority; the links, as I said, are in the download. Next slide, please. After the authorisation there was then also a first study on sperm quality, but it produced a different result from what German Bundeswehr soldiers are told, namely a significant reduction in sperm quality, that is, in motility and count, persisting after six months. The study was ended after six months, which is why there are no data beyond that, but there was a significant reduction of 25 to

1:49:05that is something that could certainly have been known before authorisation, because a study on sperm quality before and after the Corona vaccination is relatively easy to carry out, and there would certainly have been enough time; it would have been absolutely important to investigate this before market launch, and then there should actually have been no market launch, at least not for men. Next slide, please. We now come to the studies carried out on women, and here the whole thing becomes absurd to an extent we have never known, which is truly extremely worrying. The first is in February 2021, excuse the typo; there was the first prospective study on 200 women in Israel regarding their fertility, and what is interesting is that the so-called anti-Müllerian hormone was checked before and after vaccination and then over a longer period. That too is a study that can actually be carried out relatively easily and that could certainly have been done before market launch. What is disappointing is that the authors will only present the result in February 2024. So

1:50:38to a study by Pfizer-BioNTech. The next study, again excuse the typo, was started in 2021, and quite cleanly, scientifically speaking: a randomised, placebo-controlled registration study on safety, tolerability and effectiveness in 4,000 pregnant women. That is how it was started and announced. What is somewhat disappointing is that the study was stopped just under a year later because only 349 women had been recruited, and the manufacturer itself writes, in response to a journalist's enquiry as to why this study was stopped and why so few women were recruited: yes, it was a registration study that is absolutely necessary for this conditional authorisation; it was ended because in the course of 2021 Covid vaccinations were recommended to all pregnant women by all responsible organisations, and so there were hardly any women left who could be recruited, because there were hardly enough women left for the placebo group.

1:51:59That means a study that is absolutely necessary for an authorisation and had been cleanly planned was made impossible, because the authorities said we don't need the study at all, [women] should [get vaccinated], which was largely done, and so carrying out the registration study was in effect made impossible, and it has meanwhile also been officially stopped. That means we will never get a corresponding study. Next slide, please. This then led the manufacturer to update the product information. You see here, February 2023, instead of presenting clean scientific studies, it writes: well, by now a large number of women have been vaccinated, and on the basis of the large amount of observational data we assume that it is safe when used in pregnancy, or can be used safely in pregnancy. But one has to bear in mind that, according to several sources, only about 6% of vaccine complications are reported at all. That means this is an absolutely scandalous procedure, and if you remember Contergan: that scandal was possible back then because there were no registration studies yet. Here something is actually being repeated in the same way as with Contergan, by saying: we are doing a registration study, but it is in effect made impossible, and then on the basis of observational data it is said:

1:53:47yes, we [assume] it is safe anyway. What is interesting and worrying is that in these almost two years since authorisation the manufacturer has evidently done nothing regarding reproductive toxicity, because the information on this important aspect is unchanged. The manufacturer has not commissioned any further studies. But if we look on the next slide at what actually happened with these reported side effects, there is a current, relatively interesting study, not yet peer-reviewed but already published as a preprint, and the authors did something interesting: they said, we compared the reports of side effects after flu vaccination with the reports of side effects after Corona vaccination. That is a very interesting, clean approach, and of course one has to bear in mind that considerably more Corona vaccinations were administered than flu vaccinations, and

1:55:07people, the numbers of side effects were compared and compiled, and you can already see that the Corona vaccination evidently caused considerably more side effects by orders of magnitude, in some cases by worrying orders of magnitude, or rather considerably more side effects were reported. And here once more the note that only a vanishingly small percentage of the vaccine side effects that actually occurred are reported, as several independent sources tell us independently of one another. Next slide. What else can we observe? This too has partly already been reported: we have found a massive decline in births in various countries: Germany, Austria, Switzerland.

1:56:08This was observed, and in Germany it is partly also stated by the official statistical databases. But one must not only consider the decline in births; one must also look at the course, the trend. That means there was not only an unprecedented sharp decline in births, but a trend was actually broken here, and that is really worrying. There are various possibilities that could now be discussed as the cause. Next slide: the Corona vaccination is of course one of the possibilities, and colleagues in Germany and Switzerland have also evaluated this statistically, and what is really worrying and should be an absolute alarm signal is that a statistically highly significant connection is found between the administration of Corona vaccinations in the childbearing age group and the decline in births. This decline is presented here for Austria, but it is also found in Germany and Switzerland. In Germany it has also already been shown that this correlates with the different federal states as well, and of course a single correlation is never proof of causality;

1:57:48must parallel, parallel, parallel shifted decline in births; that comes very close to causal proof, and that brings us to the end and to the final question. Last slide, please: how can the harmfulness of the vaccination, the incredibly many contradictions that

1:58:25there has never been anything like it since the Second World War, and something recently became public: in the USA, documents were made public under the Freedom of Information Act, in particular the government's contracts with the vaccine manufacturers. The big surprise is that the contracts with the vaccine manufacturers were concluded by the US Department of Defense, and one really has to ask: why isn't the health ministry doing that? You can read it all; the links are given. The contracts were largely signed by the Department of Defense, and if you look at the contracts more closely, not only was the order placed by the Department of Defense, along with price and quantity, but the entire administration and processing was also very precisely managed and controlled by the Department of Defense, and that raises some very uncomfortable questions. I have no answer, but I would like to raise this aspect, and the question arises whether we are dealing with a health-policy project at all. What is the Department of Defense doing? If the US Department of Defense is involved and evidently manages it decisively, then the question arises whether we are not looking at a military project here, and on this I can only recommend the video by Sasha Latypova; you'll find it

2:00:09in the links given. Thank you for your attention, and I look forward to a very exciting rest of the evening. Yes. be held responsible. What I as a gynaecologist find scandalous, and I think you feel the same, Christian, is that the professional association of gynaecologists, at least in Germany, led by its then president Dr Christian Albring, and also the German Society of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, practically pushed gynaecological colleagues to vaccinate pregnant women off-label, long before the official STIKO recommendation, which came at some point in September. I don't know if it was similar in Austria. I think it's a scandal. As the next speaker, dear viewers, I may announce Prof.

2:01:09Werner Bergholz. What I said about the previous speakers applies to him too: Prof. Bergholz has also been involved in Corona education from the start. Prof. Bergholz is a physicist, a former professor of electrical engineering at Jacobs University in Bremen; he is a partner of

2:01:30among other things he was also a member of the German Bundestag's expert commission responsible for evaluating the Corona measures. He is tirelessly active, jetting from north to south as an all-rounder on Corona topics to various press conferences, and is also a sought-after interview guest. Today he will present further evidence pointing to the dangers of Covid vaccination. Dear Werner, I look forward to your presentation. Yes, thank you very much for the introduction. I'll activate screen sharing right away. Okay, that should be visible now. Yes, evidence: it's like a trial based on circumstantial evidence. From all the previous speakers we have, so to speak, the quality and the mode of action: what is actually going on? And my task now is the quantity, and I can say in advance that the figures the Robert Koch Institute always gives us in the safety reports, namely that 0.17 per cent of all spike injections, or Covid-19 injections, lead to a report and 0.02 per cent to serious side effects, we will see quite different figures.

2:03:00Well, well. So the politicians, last but not least Karl Lauterbach, and leading physicians kept repeating like a mantra: the vaccination is effective and safe. In English I would say: my toenail. So, already in July 2021 we saw from Israeli data, that is, half a year after the start: look at these two curves. One curve is the percentage of vaccinated people in Israel for various age groups, which ones is not important now, and the other is the percentage of new infections among the vaccinated. If the vaccination were 100% effective, the curve would have to be at 0, because none of the vaccinated would be infected. If it were 10% effective, they would be there, and so on, but it is identical. That means 0% was already seen there, which Alain Berset's staff member in Switzerland had already told him in June or July, or rather also said publicly, and that is the basis of the criminal complaint against Alain Berset.

2:04:33The Robert Koch Institute took a little longer to reach this conclusion. This is a curve from the weekly report of 28 April 2022, and here vaccine effectiveness is plotted. 0 means: makes no difference. Negative: these last points are actually negative, they simply set them back to 0, and that means this vaccination not only doesn't help, it has the opposite effect. That is the 16 to 60 age group, and according to the data, which in my experience with the Robert Koch Institute are not 100% clean either, the over-60s would at least still have 50% remaining vaccine effectiveness. So, and now the real scandal: after that there were no more data on the subject. But now comes the real bombshell: from, I believe, November 2023 [as stated] there was a study by a large clinic in Cleveland in the USA, and I evaluated figure 2 in this study: how great is the probability compared with no vaccination? No vaccination means 100%. We see: one vaccination 180, two vaccinations 250, 300. That means the more often people are vaccinated, the worse it gets. We also heard in one of the talks why that is, among others from Professor Ulrike Kämmerer. So the conclusion is: the vaccination not only doesn't help, it harms; it increases susceptibility, which can also be seen in the increased sick notes.

2:06:53Is it safe? A diagram that my colleague Fiala has just shown: flu vaccinations were compared there, the side effects of the flu vaccination for menstrual disorders and others, compared with these "vaccinations" against Covid-19, in quotation marks, and a huge increase was seen precisely with menstrual problems. I evaluated the same thing in September 2021 in preparation for the first pathology conference, and it has not changed significantly since. Here, in this case, extrapolated, is the ratio of the number of side effects per 100,000 vaccinations, because there were quite different numbers: for side effects overall a factor of 22, that is 2,200%, for serious side effects still 500%, and the real bombshell: almost 3,000% for the deceased. The data sources are from the Paul Ehrlich Institute, from the safety reports or the database, which by the way has now also been made inaccessible. It was discontinued many months ago, perhaps even a year ago. I would remind you that there are also no more safety reports on vaccine effectiveness.

2:08:27At the beginning I said: typically serious side effects 0.02%. This is now the result of a study, the source is given here, a preprint. 301 adolescents in Thailand were double-vaccinated, and, for example, almost 8% had a racing heart, which adolescents don't have, shortness of breath 6.5%, palpitations can occur in adolescents, but for quite different reasons, chest pain or high blood pressure, and, demonstrated by laboratory tests and imaging, 2.3% myocarditis. So we see 2%, and that is only one of the possible effects, compared with 0.02%. That means the under-reporting rate is more like a factor of 100 and not a factor of 17, 13, 15, 10 or 50, as is usually bandied about, at least for this finding.

2:09:46So, before I explain this graph: a similar result came from a recent study at a clinic in Basel. There it was demonstrated by laboratory tests that a good 3% of the staff, that is, of working age from 18 to 60 or 65, had heart problems. Myocarditis was played down, well, it's very mild and it heals, but I have learned from colleagues at MWGFD that that won't be the case: once broken, always broken. Well, be that as it may, but the really most alarming thing is a source accessible on the website of the lawyer Tom Renz in the USA. He obtained the original data of 2.5 million US military personnel from 2021, and here again the percentage increase is shown, in addition to what was usual from 2016 to 2022 [as stated]. 2.5 million people, predominantly very well-trained people, not quite representative, 16 per cent women and the rest men, but trained and monitored without gaps, and this is quite something: 4 per cent heart problems, so again these ominous 3 to 4 per cent, but much worse: 3.5 per cent additional cancer cases, and the absolute bombshell is nerve problems: 36 per cent and more. That reminds me of what Dr

2:11:56Hockertz said earlier: these spike proteins are neurotoxic, so in that respect this would of course be totally logical. Of course I would say: well, with thorough monitoring in the military, things may also be noticed that an ordinary person would dismiss: "oh yes, it's tingling a bit here" or "I have a strange feeling here", paraesthesias, but I'm not taking that seriously now. So, and last but not least: some of the military personnel are of childbearing and reproductive age, and more than half a per cent have demonstrably become infertile. And a curve similar to the one my colleague Fiala showed earlier, the same from Germany: that was the first vaccination of the relevant age groups, and we see here, this scale isn't quite right any more, it even goes to September, something happened there, so up to and including September, you can see, or even October, it simply doesn't stop, and yesterday I already took a first look at October, or even November: it stays the same.

2:13:30So a very bad thing, not only the problems for the vaccinated. And if I now simply extrapolate the three per cent, or five per cent, perhaps overall, myocarditis was only one of the possible things: earlier we heard from Ronny Weikl about some 60 million vaccinated, at least double-vaccinated. Five per cent of 60 million is three million seriously vaccine-injured. Three million, let that sink in. Three per cent and not 0.02 per cent. Excess mortality has been very well studied by various people, to my taste too, and the result is roughly one death per thousand vaccinations, whereby, I have the feeling, or let me say as someone somewhat versed in statistics, yes, I consider that highly probable, but I would be even surer if it became a bit clearer, even if Arne Burkhardt has demonstrated unequivocally that there is causality, at least in the cases that were examined. So, these are the latest death figures from 2022 and the first calendar weeks, which is why there are more calendar weeks here than the year has, and we see, up to the age of 55, I looked at, asked someone who didn't know, what is

2:15:22then from age 55 there is this clear increase here; it is statistically unequivocal, very hard, and documented by the German Destatis. And around this time the second booster was recommended for these age groups, at least from 60. That is not proof, but it is striking. Let us come to the conclusions or the summary: the Corona injections do not confer immunity; on the contrary, they promote infections, and not only with SARS-CoV-2 but with all sorts of things. Serious side effects occur in 3 per cent of the vaccinated, and 3 per cent, well, I wrote something about 5 million here, so you can see it as you like, that was a different basis, I need to correct that so it is consistent: the live births and the excess mortality. There is very probably a causal link there, and there are now serious allegations of manipulation regarding phase 3 of the trials; that is the Welt article that appeared a few days ago. And when I see all these statistics, three to five per cent of the vaccinated and possibly one death in a thousand, what

2:17:15seen, seen in the original, and with 20,000 trial participants we would have to have at least 20 deaths, and there is indeed talk of 20 people who died in mysterious ways. In other words: not only the quality and the mechanism of these injections are well demonstrated, but the full quantity too; for me that is by now convincingly documented. The only problem is that it has not yet reached the mainstream, and when that happens, I think I wouldn't want to be in the shoes of some of the people responsible. Thank you very much for your attention. Many thanks for your interesting compilation and your convincing remarks, clear words, many thanks. Because we have now heard a great deal about the dangers of gene-based vaccinations, dear viewers, I would like to show you what the German Federal Health Minister Lauterbach thinks about them. For this I have prepared two video clips that I found in the so-called current information of the Federal Ministry of Health, which pleasingly is always shown directly under the MWGFD YouTube videos. By the way, that's not the case with all videos, but a comment under one of our videos drew my attention to it; someone wrote: under the video the first thing is an advert for the vaccination; that

2:18:58is simply unbelievable. And I took a look; I hadn't noticed it at all, and indeed, if you click on it, you get to the Federal Ministry of Health's page "Together against Corona". And I then watched the item "Vaccine against Covid-19: current information from the Federal Ministry of Health", which appears directly under the video, and couldn't believe my eyes and ears at the brazen lies our health minister is spreading there. Under "Kaltext". You heard correctly, not "Klartext", plain talk, but "Kaltext", a little funny play on words. Let me briefly play you what Karl Lauterbach comes out with there. I ask for the clip with the number 13.

2:19:48All in all these side effects are very rare, especially the serious side effects. There are also no vaccinations that have ever been studied as well with regard to their side effects as the Covid vaccinations. I hope you could hear it; what he said there is certainly interesting. Or Karl Lauterbach on the risk of death after Covid vaccination; that would be video number 14, please.

2:20:25The risk of dying from the vaccination is extremely low; the probability of dying of Covid is much higher. Yes, dear viewers, how long would his nose have to grow if he were Pinocchio? But since we're on the subject, let's take one last look at my beloved Bundeswehr information leaflet, and there I ask

2:21:02effect; even thoughtlessly reaching for a headache tablet can certainly cause worse side effects than the vaccination. End of quote. So these are all convincing arguments, aren't they? And then one last thing, I promise, this really is the last, picture number 16 please. Please savour the text; I'll read it out: anyone who reaches for a starter in a restaurant without hesitation can just as confidently trust the ingredients and excipients in the mRNA vaccination. Salt, fat, water and sugar are found in both.

2:21:58Before I got to know him, I always thought health insurance billing statistics and figures were something boring, but our next speaker, Tom Lausen, taught me otherwise. He has often caused a stir and uproar with them, for example when he presented the data from the billing statistics of BKK ProVita, or with his appearance in the German Bundestag. So look forward to what the data analyst, programmer and Spiegel bestselling author Tom Lausen puts together from health insurance figures and statistics. I look forward to your talk, dear Tom.

2:22:35Thank you very much, dear Ronny. Of course I'd like to see myself, or rather the presentation, but first of all warm thanks for the invitation. I was very pleased; I listened intently to the talks; there are some topics among them that I have also touched on with the data I have looked at. Today I'm concerned with something very important; perhaps show slide number 1. Today I'm concerned with health insurance data, namely a category of data I haven't shown very often yet and which also allows certain conclusions: incapacity-for-work data. I asked myself how, with the many positive PCR tests, one can find out how many people were really unable to work, or rather, what we actually want to know is how many had more severe symptoms and were therefore really no longer able to work. And with Corona we all experienced that as soon as you had a positive test you were taken out of circulation, so you couldn't actually say whether someone was really sick and unable to work or not; that was somehow never measured at all. So the only way of measuring it is, in some way, the people who go to the doctor or get a sick note by phone because they are simply ill and then can't work any more.

2:24:06This category of data, which I, perhaps briefly beforehand: when does one speak of incapacity for work? The National Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians writes: incapacity for work exists when, because of illness, the patient can no longer carry out the activity last performed before the incapacity, or can only do so at the risk of the illness getting worse. Yes, that's what one expects of an illness. Next slide. Yes, I've just said it: since 2020 we have had masses of symptom-free PCR positives. Next. And I then asked myself whether there is a way of finding out which of the symptom-free were still able to work and which were not, and indeed I came across the fact that the Techniker Krankenkasse, for example, but also, we'll come to that in a moment, the Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians of Baden-Württemberg, and others too, I've only included these two sources: I am in quarantine because of the coronavirus; why don't I get a certificate of incapacity for work? And at the bottom it says: if you are sent into quarantine as a precaution because you show symptoms of a Corona illness, the doctor can issue a sick note. But if there are no symptoms, the doctor cannot. This also applies if you have tested positive. So for me a possible way of measuring, simply to distinguish between people who

2:25:49have symptoms and people without symptoms. Next. Here it is again from the Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians of Baden-Württemberg: incapacity for work in the case of infection, infected person in isolation. If a patient suffers from symptoms of illness as a result of infection with the SARS-CoV-2 virus and is therefore not

2:26:13able to work, issue a sick note. For patients, and careful now, they have the mistake on their own website: for patients who show no Corona symptoms, they probably mean, no sick note is to be issued. Next slide, please.

2:26:31And then of course I asked myself what the situation is with incapacity for work due to Corona. Next. Yes, first I had to know how many cases of incapacity for work there are by diagnosis and age group among statutory health insurance members. For this I have the figures for 2020 from the Federal Ministry of Health, which originally come from the statutory health insurance umbrella association, and we see here that we have 36 million cases of incapacity for work, that is, sick notes, per year. That's also roughly the average that recurs every year. And by comparison: the number of people in employment in the fourth quarter of 2022, for example, was 45.9 million.

2:27:22That means statistically almost 80 per cent have a period of incapacity for work once a year. Next slide. Yes, now the AfD member of the Bundestag Kay-Uwe Ziegler, who always asks a great many questions, wanted to know what the situation was and asked the Federal Ministry of Health a written question, and on 21 February 2023, so not long ago, as you can see, received an answer from the Parliamentary State Secretary, Ms Dittmar. Next slide. The question was, and you only need to read the yellow part: what are the data for ICD codes T88.1, U12.9, U07.1, Y59.9 for the period 2016 to 2021? Let me explain briefly. T88.1 and T88.0 are the codes that have always applied.

2:28:20When someone has come to a doctor and the doctor codes and bills it, these are vaccine side-effect codes. Likewise Y59.9. It can vary; they are a bit different. But they are also used for Corona. And U12.9 is a newly introduced code for side effects of Corona vaccines, the novel ones. And here we also have the question about the U07.1s. These are those who have a positive PCR test. So Mr Ziegler wanted information on these figures. He wanted the figures for these codes. How many cases of incapacity for work arose? Next slide. Yes, let's start with "coronavirus detected". Or rather, at federal level it even says "Covid-19 virus detected".

2:29:13So they act as if it were an illness. But we know all that. And we see that in 2020, under U07.1, we have 171,731 cases of positive tests that had incapacity for work. In this case they were definitely symptomatic, with signs of illness. And in 2021 there were 324,766. So, we have just, one more, the next one. We have just seen that in total we had 36 million

2:29:53certificates of incapacity for work, that is, sick notes. And we now see that with Corona we had 171,731 sick notes. I calculated it. The figures can only be put together by saying: okay, 0.48 per cent of all sick notes in 2020 are attributable to Corona. Next slide. I want to remind you once more: if there are no symptoms, it says in the bottom paragraph, the doctor cannot do this. So he cannot issue a certificate of incapacity for work. That means only if symptoms were present was the doctor allowed to issue a certificate of incapacity for work. Next slide. Yes, and of course that raises the question of the hasty introduction of new vaccines, with a 0.48 per cent share of sick notes in 2020.

2:30:52That seems to me a bit like using a sledgehammer to crack a nut. Next slide. We already saw and heard this sentence right at the beginning today: we will ultimately administer the vaccine to be developed to 7 billion people. There the sledgehammer is even bigger. And it was brought out very early, namely at Easter 2020, when these incapacity-for-work data weren't even known yet. Next slide. Probably everyone saw that. A great deal of space was given to it. And I think it was a very strange moment for everyone too, that they wanted to vaccinate practically 7 billion people. And we now see that in 2020, next slide, that in 2020, out of 36 million certificates of incapacity for work, essentially only 171,000 went to Corona.

2:31:42In 2021, when the Corona vaccinations then came onto the market, the number of incapacities for work rose to 324,744 cases. Unfortunately I don't know the total number of all certificates of incapacity for work for 2021. But I assume it won't be that many more. That's still 0.9 per cent of all sick notes in 2021 that were due to Corona. Next slide. The question: what about vaccine side effects? Because we all know that, regarding vaccine side effects, both the BKK and the National Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians have already reported how many codes for vaccine side effects there were. We see it in hospitals. We know there were reports of suspected deaths, and so on.

2:32:34But today we are only looking at incapacity for work. Due to vaccine side effects, next please. Yes, here we have them. And we now see in green in 2016, let's start with T88.1, because it's an important ICD code. That's where doctors book most vaccine side effects, so to speak. In 2016 we had 3,300 cases of incapacity for work. You see around 3,000 in 2017 too. Just under 4,000 in 2018. Then 4,000 in 2019; in 2020 the start of the vaccination campaign on 27 December probably already plays a role; things probably went very quickly then. We had 5,700. And then in 2021 we had 965,385 cases of incapacity for work. So you can already see that there is a clear disproportion here between incapacities for work and sick notes that existed earlier with previous vaccinations.

2:33:36You can also already see here that it's a much higher number. The second important figure is U12.9, which was only introduced as a code in April 2021. That's another 269,000. Next slide, please. And now we have the comparison of vaccine side effects versus Corona. Next slide. It looks like this. Vaccine side effects in 2021: we have 1.24 million cases of incapacity for work due to vaccine side effects. And for Corona in 2021 we have 324,000 cases. That's about four times more sick notes due to vaccine side effects than due to Corona. I point out once again that this is official information from the Federal Ministry of Health. These are not fantasy figures, even if they sound like fantasy, unfortunately in the wrong direction.

2:34:28So they are real figures. And one has to say that, looking at these figures, we already see a huge disproportion here. And that this really already represents, from a completely different side, an indicator that should make one doubt whether this vaccination is really a very sensible thing for the broad mass and for broad use. Next again, please. I then went to the trouble of looking at how many days of incapacity for work all the vaccinations that existed before caused, from 2016 to 2020. And I must point out once more, these are the official figures of the Federal Ministry of Health in Germany. And we had 20,644 cases of incapacity for work altogether.

2:35:182016, over five years. And we now have, and the number isn't rounded now, 1,242,847 cases of incapacity for work. That's 60 times more cases of incapacity for work due to vaccine side effects in 2021 than from 2016 to 2020, five years combined. But in 2021 there were only four times more vaccinations than in each previous year. Next slide, please. Oh, it's there again. Right. The conclusion I draw from this: the incapacity-for-work data already in 2020 speak clearly against a hasty vaccine authorisation. The presentation can be switched off at this point. Then I can say something more and you can see me.

2:36:08That means, for me, from the side of the incapacity-for-work data too, it is pretty clear that, if you think, okay, you can make a vaccine, you're welcome to produce one, but that it then has to happen in such a hasty form, with telescoping and whatever other great ideas they had, I consider that, in view of these data, I'd say, an act of gamblers who basically had only one particular goal. That's also why I included this interview with Bill Gates, because it was clear very early on that seven billion people were to be vaccinated, regardless of whether this illness particularly affects people of working age up to 65 or not.

2:37:02Everyone was to be vaccinated, and as quickly as possible. And on the basis of these figures one can now trace this path very well and see that at that time it would never, at no time, have been necessary to bring a vaccine onto the market that produces so many incapacities for work. And in this respect I can only say, from this side too, and I have already examined many other sides, including the reports of suspected deaths, I consider it imperative that this vaccination first be brought to an end and a rough evaluation be made of all this, that the compulsory vaccinations stop, especially in the Bundeswehr. That was already more of a topic today.

2:37:44But I think there are some speakers coming after me who will contribute to that too. Anyway, that was my contribution for now. I wanted to bring these new figures to people. There has already been criticism, because people said, yes, if you're in quarantine, I'd like to say this in conclusion, if you're in quarantine, the employer doesn't really want a sick note, because then he may have to pay the employee himself, whereas if there had only been a certificate from the health office, the employer could have got the money back, so to speak. And so, so to speak, masses of people would not have got a sick note, and there would actually have been many more.

2:38:28Of course that's all conjecture and speculation. And it would mean that, where a certificate of incapacity for work should actually have been issued, employers would have had to have been defrauded millions of times over. And with the best will in the world I can't imagine that, because of a Corona illness, they say: I'd rather have the money from the authorities, and so I don't want a sick note from you at all. I can't imagine that. The government would look into that. And we haven't seen that. So I assume that these incapacity-for-work figures really are as low as the federal government has given them to us and as we have now looked at them. And with that I would say that, in view of these data, one can still look to the future calmly.

2:39:18However, I will also be very interested to see what incapacity-for-work data come our way for 2022. Because we are all experiencing very exciting times, in which employees are missing and there is excess mortality. We've already heard something about that. I didn't want to comment on that today. Turbulent times. And I look forward to the rest of the talks. Thank you very much for letting me speak here. Thank you. Warm thanks, dear Tom, for the great presentation. Clear figures that confirm exactly what the previous speakers said. And with that I move on to the next speaker. It is my MWGFD colleague Professor Andreas Sönnichsen. He is a specialist in general medicine and internal medicine. Until recently he headed the Department of General and Family Medicine at the Medical University of Vienna.

2:40:05But he lost this teaching post there because of his statements critical of the Corona measures. But he doesn't let that bend him; instead he is all the more active in the Corona education movement. As an expert on many Corona topics he is a sought-after interviewee. Until 2021, by the way, he was chairman of the German Network for Evidence-Based Medicine. We were very happy with him that recently, on 9 February, he won his trial at the Salzburg district court over the allegedly illegal issuing of vaccination exemption certificates with an acquittal. Congratulations once again. Today in his talk Andreas Sönnichsen will present important new studies documenting the dangers of the Covid vaccinations and will also examine the question of whether most so-called long Covid, also called post-Covid, cases are nothing other than post-vax syndrome, that is, effects or side effects after the vaccinations, in other words, the result of vaccine injuries.

2:41:01But first I would like to play a short clip of what our health minister Karl Lauterbach thinks about post-vax syndrome, and for that I ask you to play number 17. Yes, control room, could you please show number 17? I can't see it at the moment.

2:41:26Post-vax syndrome is the name for a syndrome in which, after the vaccination, people cannot concentrate as well as before, or in which side effects occur, similar to post-Covid, but rarer, much rarer, and also less severe. But it is not comparable with the severity of post-Covid illness. Yes, I think it was heard, dear Andreas. We just can't hear it here in the waiting room, so to speak. I assume it could be heard outside. But now we look forward to your remarks on it. I'll say it again: Karl Lauterbach said, similar to post-Covid, but rarer, much rarer, and also less severe. But it is not comparable with the severity of post-Covid illness.

2:42:15So those were Karl Lauterbach's remarks, which you couldn't hear. And now we look forward to your talk on this topic, dear Andreas. Yes, yes. Dear Ronny, thank you very much for the kind introductory words. Okay, unfortunately I won't be able to present it at all in the way you would like, because these figures don't even exist yet.

2:42:40And there is an immense need for research here. Yes, perhaps I could have my first slide. My PowerPoint presentation, is it available somehow? Yes, this actually follows on very nicely from what Tom Lausen has just presented, who said this vaccination should be taken off the market immediately. And I'll actually start by going back once more to the study with which this vaccination, this "vaccination" in quotation marks, one has to say, was authorised at all. Okay, now I do need my slides, if possible.

2:43:29Yes indeed, exactly. You can go straight on, and then come my conflicts of interest; we can skip those too. Now let's go straight to the first slide and then straight to the next picture. Because this study, which was used to apply for authorisation worldwide, in the USA as well as in Europe and in many other countries, and which was actually not accepted by some countries, this study was flawed from the very beginning. And what you can't make out here because it's in such small print, and that's why I made a table, that's the next picture: these are the case numbers of this study, comparing the case numbers in the New England Journal article, the scientific publication, with the data submitted to the FDA.

2:44:32And you can see that even the number of randomised participants doesn't match. At the FDA, it's not a big difference, but there are 100 more at the FDA than were then published in the New England Journal. Then at the FDA, and I won't go through it in detail, supposedly only about 20,500 of the 21,800 were evaluable. Yes, but then in the FDA data too only 18,198 were actually evaluated in the vaccinated group and 18,325 in the placebo group. Those are the only data that match between the FDA and the New England Journal. And from the very beginning people asked, and Peter Doshi published a very nice article on this in the BMJ, pretty much right when the study appeared:

2:45:35yes, where did they all disappear to? 3,000 participants are missing from the evaluation. And in the New England Journal, if we look at the New England Journal figures, that's 3,500 in the vaccinated group and only 3,400 in the placebo group. So that's another discrepancy. And these large numbers are set against this minimal number of Covid cases: 8 in the vaccinated and 162 in the placebo group. And severe Covid, which is what would actually matter, or the deaths would matter even more: there were so few cases in this study that the FDA data actually say in the table: "Met predefined success criterion: No."

2:46:35So these data did not reach the success criterion for the study at all. And now the next picture. It only came to light about a year later, however, that at a study centre in Texas with 1,000 participants, or slightly over 1,000 participants, there were apparently irregularities. More than 100 queries about data irregularities somehow could not be answered adequately. And among them, strangely, were at least two cases with serious side effects. Then there were indications that the data had apparently been changed retrospectively, and the blinding had apparently been partly lifted. Any clinical trial in which something like this happens, at a study centre with over 1,000 participants, must be withdrawn immediately.

2:47:43So as a publication in a renowned scientific journal it is not tenable until these things have been cleared up. But they were never cleared up. It simply remained that way; Pfizer refused to comment on it. The data were not disclosed. We still have no access to the complete original data. And now, very recently, next picture please, the next thing comes on top. Now it is about a study centre in Argentina, in Buenos Aires, with 6,000 participants. That is 15 per cent of all trial participants. And it came out that at least one death was concealed there. At least one participant with serious side effects was regrouped into the placebo group as a Covid case.

2:48:3753 participants were unblinded without any reason being given and then removed from the study. In total at least 200 participants from the vaccine group simply dropped out. That means we now have indications from the next study centre that fraud was committed in this study. And the proponents of this vaccination, including our dear health minister, still claim: well, it's not so bad. It's only one study centre, and that wouldn't call the study as a whole into question. So you ask yourself: what would ever call a study into question then? So here there was definitely no scientifically clean work, and that is why the authorisation of this vaccine, which is based on this registration study, this phase 3 study, is also void from a legal point of view.

2:49:40The authorisation is worthless. And the vaccine should actually be taken off the market immediately, and one can only hope that the corresponding court proceedings are initiated too. We are working on it; later we will hear Philipp Kruse, who is pursuing such proceedings in Switzerland. So, the next picture, please. On overall effectiveness. There are constantly many new studies, so to speak, and in the short time I only have the opportunity to pick out a few highlights, and I have chosen two studies. Next picture, please. One is a very nice study published in December, where you can see very nicely, unfortunately it's a bit blurry, it's somehow due to the transmission.

2:50:26In any case it is a cohort study comparing unvaccinated people with those vaccinated once, twice, three times and four times, as to how they get Covid illnesses. And you see that the unvaccinated naturally get Covid illnesses too, but that is the lowest line, the black bottom line; those are the unvaccinated. And you see that the more often people were vaccinated, the higher the risk that they fall ill with Covid. So exactly the opposite of what the vaccination is actually meant to achieve. And they followed up for about three months, and you see a very, very clear result: the more often vaccinated, the worse the outcome, the higher the risk of falling ill with Covid.

2:51:23And the next picture is a study that examined the vaccine effect of the fourth dose. And here too it is quite clearly recognisable that, compared with the first booster, the second booster is even worse. After 120 days at the latest, the vaccine effect turns negative. That means the vaccinated have a higher risk of getting the illness. So not what you actually want to achieve with a vaccination. Next picture, please. Let's come to safety, to the new studies. Straight on, please. Here there is a recently published systematic review by the former Cochrane board member Peter Gøtzsche, who was thrown out of Cochrane because he was too critical of what the pharmaceutical industry claimed.

2:52:22So unfortunately that existed even before Covid. And in his systematic review he found that the rate of severe adverse events is 13.2 cases per 10,000 vaccinations. That is a factor of 45 more than the RKI data show, which speak of 0.3 per 10,000. And the most important of these side effects are thromboses, myopericarditis, especially in young adults, and facial nerve palsy. And then of course we have a vast number of very different side effects, above all neurological side effects. But none of them are really recorded quantitatively. And now I come straight to the next picture, please. Oh, that didn't work. I had asked for the Tom Lausen data to be taken out, because Tom presents them himself.

2:53:22Then let's go straight on. I had another study in there, but it's not so important. Then, since I've probably already exceeded my time, let's come straight to long Covid and post-vax. Straight to the next picture, please. Here you see, and this is a very nice piece of work, a comparison of how frequent this long Covid actually is. Because it is being hyped up enormously: that thousands of people fall ill with long Covid. And that is simply not true, because all sorts of things are counted as long Covid here. And here the frequency of post-acute infectious syndromes is compared between mononucleosis, that is, Epstein-Barr virus infection, and SARS-CoV-2, Covid.

2:54:12And you see that long Covid is much, much rarer than the post-acute infection syndromes with EBV, where we know that it leads to ME/CFS, myalgic encephalomyelitis, chronic fatigue syndrome. And of course we have very similar pictures with long Covid too. But much, much rarer than with EBV infections. And now we come to the next picture. And here we unfortunately have to say that it is now known that the vaccinations cause a syndrome very similar to long Covid in its clinical picture. But we have no figures on it. We have no figures on it because these figures are deliberately not collected. And in this way there is a temptation

2:55:17to declare post-vax cases as long Covid. So here it is very urgently necessary that, with initiatives like that of MWGFD, or like the CORI initiative, or like the Health for Austria initiative in Austria, we actually collect these data ourselves and shed some light at all on how often these post-vax syndromes occur. There is still a lot of work to do. Next picture, please. And that is already my closing word. We need prospective, representative cohort studies of vaccinated and unvaccinated people to record the incidence of serious adverse events and, above all, to record long Covid and post-vax syndromes according to a uniform definition and with reliable recording of vaccination status.

2:56:15And we finally need an open-ended, honest approach on the part of politics, science and the medical profession. It is overdue that we find our way back to scientific discourse and away from the propaganda track for a vaccination that does more, much, much more harm than good, and that we take this vaccination off the market as soon as possible. Thank you very much. Yes, thank you very much, dear Andreas, for this super compilation; you have also described well the often deficient situation in science. In our practices, as doctors in private practice, we notice again and again not only that many people are dealing with the strangest complaints after vaccinations, but also, as you have just described, that most Covid-vaccinated people are particularly susceptible to repeated infections, including Corona infections.

2:57:14And severe infections too, yes. Yes, and they also have more severe and longer courses than the unvaccinated. And that is why the complaints are of course always gladly blamed on the virus infections, but it probably comes from people having been spiked beforehand. And in my opinion the press, as the so-called fourth estate, of course also has an enormous share in this. The mainstream media, in particular the public broadcasters, the radio and television stations, as well as the usual daily newspapers and weekly magazines, which built up the Corona narrative from the beginning, the narrative of the killer virus threatening humanity, which can only be overcome with a vaccination of all 7.5 billion, or perhaps already 8 billion, people on this earth.

2:57:59And with their images and texts trimmed for fear and terror, they practically cemented panic into the minds of most people, probably to make them compliant, to switch off logical thinking and to make them compliant with the measures and ultimately to increase the acceptance of a vaccination. And at this point I would like to mention briefly our MWGFD project, the New Media Portal, with which we want to offer a counterweight to these mainstream media, and I ask for picture 18 to be shown.

2:58:33New Media Portal. That's probably picture 19, and maybe picture 18. Okay, do you still have picture 18? I had imagined it differently, but anyway: the website is neue-medien-portal.info. There, if you value freedom of opinion and freedom of information as important fundamental values and want to be informed truthfully and broadly, including on the Corona topic of course, you will find with just a few clicks access to the more than 180 free, independent media we have presented so far; we like to call them new media to distinguish them from the old media, the established mainstream media, which in the view of many people have long since ceased to fulfil their mandate of reporting as objectively as possible in accordance with the press code.

2:59:31And on this website we present the most important of these new media in short descriptions and then link to their websites or YouTube, Rumble, Twitter channels and so on, and if you want, you can use the menu bar under "main channel" to select specifically by various categories, for example online platforms, print and online, video channels, radio programmes and so on, and under "focus areas" you can search specifically for the information focuses you would like to inform yourself about, for example politics and society, medicine and science, or also spiritual or cross-topic. And for the media categories in this portal we distinguish between journalism, activism and documentation, and we are also in the process of expanding the New Media Portal internationally.

3:00:16You have just seen an insert. We are of course pleased if supporters help us establish it in other languages. The English site already exists, and a Spanish one too; other languages will follow shortly, and there too we will then present the respective media of the new language areas. There will of course also be a separate domain for each language; it won't then be called Neue Medienportal. So you can all help, if you want, to spread this website. I'll show you these little cards; you can order them in our webshop, the MWGFD webshop, we now have a shop, which I just want to point out, you can order these cards, and on the front it says "Echt jetzt?", seriously?, and when you turn it over: "Truth is long overdue", and with the QR code you get to the New Media Portal page. I think it's an important tool, because you can press it into someone's hand when you're at the petrol station or out shopping and people ask you, perhaps especially, where do you get your information from, and you can then hand them something like this.

3:01:21But now I would like to move on to the next speaker, who in his talk deals with the topic of vaccination in general, that is, also conventional vaccination not written in quotation marks, for example against tetanus or various childhood diseases and so on. Andreas Diemer, our speaker, is a doctor of general medicine and naturopathy, a graduate physicist, a musician and head of the Academy for the Art of Living and Health in Gernsbach. Look forward to what Andreas Diemer has to tell us in his talk "Everything fine with vaccination before Corona?". Dear Andreas, you have the floor. Okay, thank you, dear Ronny. Dear fellow human beings, my topic: everything fine with vaccination before Corona?

3:02:05The answer straight away: nothing was fine. But one preliminary remark: what I am about to say may not be shared by all members of the association MWGFD or by other doctors. Because this is going to be intense. But I have to say it, because it is the result of my decades of research on the subject of vaccination, to shed a bit of light into this darkness. What a stroke of luck that the Corona vaccination exists. But you're not in the wrong picture, don't worry. Here is my explanation. By now it's an open secret. These so-called vaccinations are so poorly and far too briefly studied. Not really authorised, but only conditionally, that is, provisionally, and massively advertised and administered despite side effects and ineffectiveness recognised early on. But all this means that more and more people no longer trust the recommendations of governments, politicians, regulators, pharmacists, doctors, the Paul Ehrlich Institute, STIKO, etc.

3:03:13or the EMA. And that is a good thing. The medical system, worldwide, is corrupt. For a long time, for example, the institutions that are supposed to supervise vaccine manufacturers and check their products have been steered by precisely these manufacturers and their financial interests. In the first figure here you see an example. The EMA, the European Medicines Agency, responsible among other things for the authorisation of vaccines, is 86% financed by industry. So the manufacturers check their own authorisation applications. But mistrust of the medical system in general is entirely justified when you consider that this system is a gigantic economic apparatus. Turnover in Germany in 2020 was about

3:04:10440 billion euros. Since vaccinations are, moreover, to be administered not only to the sick but to all people, at least, gigantic advertising campaigns and the manipulation of scientists, doctors, pharmacists, citizens and so on pay off all the more here. And this has been the case for many decades with all vaccinations. Where a lot of money is involved, there is trickery, fraud and lying. That calls for reflection and checking. The ball was set rolling by Dr Gerhard Buchwald, who as early as the 1960s was able to show from disease and mortality statistics that the corresponding disease figures had largely disappeared long before a vaccination was introduced. Probably through improved hygiene, the absence of war, a better food situation and so on.

3:05:06You can see the course in this symbolic or schematic graph. Hardly any vaccine has ever been studied before authorisation as it really should be, that is, according to scientifically clean criteria, so that benefits and risks can be weighed against each other. For scientific proof that the benefits outweigh the risks, some fundamental quality features of the studies would be indispensable. Randomisation, placebo control, double blinding: that should really be a matter of course, but is often not fulfilled.

3:05:45Second, we would need a realistic picture of the dangerousness of the disease in question. Here there is usually exaggeration, as we now know from Corona and Covid, in order to emphasise the urgency of a vaccination. Examples include flu, ticks and now Covid. Third, we would need a suitable study design. This requirement too is usually not met. We would need a sufficient study duration, because too short a study duration means I find fewer side effects. Second, a sufficient number of participants. With fewer participants, rare side effects are not even recorded. Design and raw data must be published. That is often not the case. One cannot control and check it.

3:06:42We would need participants from all sections of the population. But usually only young, healthy men are taken. That simulates better tolerability. Independent financing: that is never the case. Manufacturers have to finance and carry out the studies. That is of course an unholy alliance that practically invites trickery and fraud. We would also need meaningful measurement parameters instead of so-called surrogate parameters. Whether a vaccination actually prevents the disease in question is practically never investigated. But what I want to know, I have to investigate. Mostly, however, only laboratory values are investigated as substitute measures. My example with the brake lights in this figure explains it.

3:07:29I can't check the brake lights if I want to know whether the brakes work. That's not enough. We would need clean statistical evaluations with disclosure of the [data]. We would also need a reliable follow-up. That's what the observation after authorisation of a medicine or vaccine is called. That too is usually not fulfilled. But side effects often only show up after years. If you don't do it, you naturally won't find them.

3:08:17Unproven claims: the measles vaccination is said to have pushed back the disease. Wrong. We already saw it in the first figure. Let me show it again. Between 1900 and 1960 measles mortality had already fallen by 98%. The vaccination only came in 1961, but changed nothing whatsoever in the further course. The remaining 2% naturally continue to decline afterwards. But that is then attributed to the blessed vaccination. And another fallacy: that with the introduction of any vaccination the corresponding disease declines, even if this is observed, is only a correlation, not causality. Simultaneity is simply not the same as causation. Unfortunately

3:09:14Measles is said to be dangerous. On closer inspection, however, it is known that it is above all the lowering of fever that brings about the danger in the first place, especially the dreaded inflammation of the brain. There is a meaningful study on this; see the web link that will be shown in a moment. So a medical malpractice is being misused to justify the vaccination. People, think, wake up. The unvaccinated, it is also said, would fall ill with this brain inflammation more often than the vaccinated. Another unproven claim. Then: the measles vaccination is said to be practically free of side effects. Practical, very practical, yes. But the suspicion voiced by Dr Andrew Wakefield, for example, that the MMR vaccination in particular, measles-mumps-rubella, promotes autism, still hangs in the air.

3:10:09It's no different with many medicines. Miracle effects are promised, while side effects are swept under the carpet. You are welcome to read more on the websites given here. That is why my appeal, above all to us doctors, is to keep away from pharmaceutical advertising and not be fooled. Not to let pharmaceutical reps into the practice or clinic. Not to attend continuing education that takes place with the kind permission and support of company XY, and so on and so forth. You understand what I mean. Not to consume pharma-financed media. Medical Tribune, for example, Apotheken Umschau and such things. Then check the guidelines. There is a super website, leitlinienwatch.de. You'll be astounded.

3:11:07So here is my summary. Following on from the quote by Winston Churchill, and with that I've reached the end of my short talk, I recommend: trust no vaccination that you haven't rejected yourself. Thank you very much and all the best to you. Thank you, thank you, dear Andreas. Super compilation, super talk. Thank you for your remarks on the subject of vaccination in general. You were pushing at an open door with me. That must

3:11:42in any case it is clearly visible that vaccination has always been a lucrative business for the pharmaceutical industry, and that for the re-establishment of a sensible holistic medicine with the human being at the centre, it is absolutely necessary that we really free ourselves from these dependencies on the pharmaceutical companies. And now, in the transition to the next talk, I wanted to ask the two speakers, I don't know if they can hear me right away, I would have suggested a small switch, swapping eleven and ten, that is, practically, that Christian Schubert, Professor Christian Schubert, goes first, if that's all right with Heiko Schöning; I don't know if Christian Schubert is ready yet; I can already see Heiko Schöning in the States.

3:12:23No problem, all good. Okay, thanks, because I think on the topic, since we're still on holistic things, and your topic probably leads more into the legal part that's coming soon anyway, how we have to deal with it. So that's why I would

3:12:57which Professor Hockertz was already able to touch on a little, but which overall were still somewhat under-represented. Christian, I look forward to your talk. Yes, warm thanks, I'm looking forward to it too. I would like to span a wider frame. Let's see whether the slides are already showing. There they are, exactly. You can show the next slide straight away. Exactly. From the beginning of this Covid crisis, this pandemic, I pointed out that we must be careful; we may not only be dealing with a virus pandemic, but perhaps even with a pandemic of a false image of humanity.

3:13:45And many of us very quickly saw the wrong figures, very quickly saw how we are treating people here, be it lockdowns, school closures, or later the vaccination, where statements were made such as we absolutely need the vaccination so that the pandemic ends, which ultimately means technology is more important than nature; we evidently cannot rely on our nature. That

3:14:22or conventional medicine, and this slide I'm showing here is only an excerpt from a series of epistemological errors in current medicine, which is therefore also called machine medicine, because not only are body, mind and soul separated, but it is also believed or thought that the human being is composed of the smallest building blocks, and that if you then examine them down to the smallest details, you will at some point find out what health means and what illness means, and from systems-theoretical considerations alone that is quite simply wrong. You see here, next slide please,

3:15:31yes, exactly, here you see very nicely shown George Engel's biopsychosocial model, introduced into the literature in the mid-1970s. In the middle you see the so-called hierarchy of levels of nature; that is a common approach to natural phenomena, and humans belong to it too: seeing nature as organised in levels. At the lowest level of complexity we see subatomic particles; the whole thing builds up via atoms, molecules and organelles, cells and tissues and organs up to the person, and then further via the two-person system into multi-person systems. I won't go into it in more detail, but I would like to say that everything here belongs together, so here one has to think systemically; there is no longer any separation between these entities; everything interacts. And what is especially important: it is an anti-reductionist model, because it assumes that more complex systems such as relationships, families and social systems are more complex and therefore more powerful than, ultimately, biological phenomena. That means the person who falls ill is the one embedded in wrong, sickening social situations, as we were also able to see very clearly over the last three years. Ultimately it is not the virus that kills people but the way people are treated; those are social and cultural phenomena. So the biopsychosocial model already

3:16:57anticipated this very nicely, and here on the left we also see a whole-part relation, and that will now determine the rest of my talk. You see here the individual parts depicted with circles and larger whole systems. That means nothing other than that the cell may be called a whole when it comes to the organelles, molecules, atomic and subatomic particles beneath it, but it is itself in turn part of more complex aspects such as tissues and organs. And in the same way the person is to be seen as a whole regarding everything beneath it, but is itself in turn only part of relationships. And a topic such as the immune system runs through the entire hierarchy of levels, because everything is connected and embedded in whole-part relations. On the right you see the example of the immune system: we don't only have a biological immune system; that is only a small material, ultimately mechanistic aspect of our immune system. We have more complex immune systems that we urgently need to deal with, namely a psychological immune system: disgust, fear, anxiety, but also anger, aggression, which acts like an inflammation when it comes to setting boundaries. And socially there are of course immune systems too; think of shutting oneself off from strangers. When people set themselves apart from strangers, that is not simply racism; it is of course also

3:18:26a social, cultural gesture in the sense that there could be different hygiene conditions, other hygiene situations among these people from whom one has to protect oneself. So social immune systems exist too. Another slide, please.

3:18:44This is psychoneuroimmunology, depicted quickly; we're doing a quick run-through of our psyche, our social life and our brain. Click, please, because the acute stressor leads, since all systems belong together in the biopsychosocial model, click please,

3:19:04to activation of the sympathetic nervous system, and this sympathetic system, click on please, now activates the transcription factor NF-κB, click on, and thus inflammation, click on please. Inflammation is activated under acute stress but then immediately downregulated again, because, as we all know, inflammation is not necessarily good for the organism in the long term. Click please, there is, click again, there is activation of the vagus, click again, a feedback inhibition of NF-κB, click again, there is activation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal system, please click two or three times in a row, exactly, and thus again inhibition of inflammation, and finally, click again, there is a corresponding T-helper type 2 response, which also downregulates inflammation. We are actually quite well protected against prolonged inflammation. Click again, please. But it can be that we are chronically under pressure, a lot

3:20:25and are under immunosuppression and thus at increased risk of developing an infection, for example SARS-CoV-2. Just that as the psychoneuroimmunological background to Covid-19. That means people who have now been put into fear and panic for years must, with great probability, fear a collective immune, a collective immunosuppression, and thus an increased risk of infection. That is a kind of paradox. Please. In this context I have put forward the thesis that a medicine whose explanatory models are dualistic and reductionist tends towards paradoxes that carry the risk of being associated with more harm than benefit for the patient. Click on please. Here we have the example of the virus, biopsychosocially; I showed it earlier for the immune system; now we play the same game biopsychosocially with the virus, and you see the virus consists materially, biologically, of RNA, capsid and envelope. However, this pandemic is an infodemic and a psycho-pandemic. That means this virus was very quickly symbolised as a killer virus. That means the people confronted with this SARS-CoV-2 were confronted not only with the substance, with the biology, but also with everything around it. The images have already been mentioned, the death figures, everything that started from the very beginning; that caused people fear and panic, and, very

3:21:59importantly, the virus was with us long before, in quotation marks, with the help of media and images, before it was materially with us at all. That means it was evidently released in China and was sent to us via the media faster than we could imagine, and had already put us into fear and panic and suppressed our immune system before the virus was even there. So we were able to receive it very nicely with corresponding immunosuppression, and I could imagine that many incidences are buried in this situation. Next slide. We now come to post-Covid, and here again we have this longitudinal section. If you click several times, please,

3:22:42then you see very nicely, just click through the picture, please, then you see that with traumatisation there is a disturbance of this stress system, and in the long term we ultimately have inflammation that is not downregulated because too little cortisol is released under stress. Click again, please. Exactly. And what happens when we have too much inflammation? Then, in the longer term, click again please, we have to fear certain illnesses such as autoimmune diseases, metabolic symptoms, cancer recurrence, but my particular focus here should be on autoimmunity, because we know from post-Covid that it has a lot to do with autoimmunity, and here the assumption suggests itself that trauma is a very essential aspect. Click on please, because not only are autoimmune diseases caused by elevated inflammation values in the blood, but these autoimmune diseases are also associated with psychological phenomena that we call sickness behaviour, or, chronified, chronic atypical depression. We are dealing with exhaustion phenomena, loss of appetite and sleep disorders, depressive manifestations, that is, neuropsychiatric syndromes, lack of interest, concentration disorders and also social changes. These are all aspects that in the short term, next slide, in the short term are quite physiologically important to bring the person into a state

3:24:03in which they provide energy for the process of fighting off the pathogen. However, if the inflammation is present in the blood for longer, for example in traumatised people, and is thus also transferred to the brain, then we are dealing with chronic syndromes such as those listed on the right, for example post-traumatic stress disorder, somatoform pain disorder, chronic fatigue syndrome, autoimmune diseases, burnout, and possibly, I strongly suspect so, post-Covid and perhaps even post-vaccine syndrome. Next, please. Because this long and post-Covid, Andreas, I at least have these figures here: 15% of all Covid cases from a study in 2021, 13% lasting longer than a month, 4% more than two months and 2% more than three months, so really long. Covid is not just a pure cold, as we know, but a multi-organ pathology. I won't go into that in more detail now, but what is very, very important: this post-Covid syndrome has neurovegetative symptoms, breathlessness, sleeplessness, cough, persistent loss of smell and taste, and exhaustion, all aspects that can certainly also be associated with anxiety, and that ultimately is trauma and traumatisation, and also symptoms from the neuropsychiatric spectrum such as cognitive disorders, depression and anxiety. There are certain predictive factors, interestingly here too a strong similarity to post-traumatic stress disorder, and,

3:25:34very importantly, pre-existing mental illnesses such as anxiety predispose to long or post-Covid. Another slide, please. In my view, if one may be a little critical, reductionist research and dualistic research, machine medicine, is poking around in the brain fog, a quite provocative thesis; it is ultimately poking around in the material, looking for persistence of the virus, for virus components, but it also sees these symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder, or aspects such as immune dysregulation, autoimmunity, dysregulation of the renin-angiotensin system and others, as side effects of Covid-19 therapy. Next, please.

3:26:22Exactly, something can't be right there, hence this bar: dualism and reductionism are very strong here. Nobody talks about the psyche here, nobody talks about traumatisation, nobody talks about more complex aspects of post-Covid; people search desperately in the sand and don't look around them at more complex areas. The long or post-Covid paradox could then be that the stress system of people under severe psychological strain, as we know, is associated with inflammation. Stress-related increases in inflammation in turn result in sickness behaviour, chronified sickness behaviour, and thus corresponding psychiatric symptoms. The Corona crisis, and this must clearly be placed at the centre once again, is a crisis of the image of humanity. It has had incredible effects on people's psychosocial level; we know what an enormous amount has happened with anxiety and depression in children, with obsessive-compulsive disorders, eating disorders, and in adults too with corresponding severe psychiatric clinical pictures, so that we can certainly say that long Covid and post-traumatic stress disorder seem to be quite similar and connected. And if we now again look only at the material level in therapy, the risk of these illnesses becoming further chronified will be increased unless we really think causally and include more complex

3:27:46aspects such as trauma in the therapeutic toolkit. So very, very important. That is industry's next windfall. Now of course they'll make sure anti-inflammatory drugs are brought onto the market. Now there will be a great deal of lying and blustering in order ultimately to increase sales markets again, and I am convinced that a very essential aspect of this post-Covid illness is trauma. And so to my last slide: here again we go into the biopsychosocial symbolic area. Biologically we are certainly dealing with a messenger RNA "vaccination", in quotation marks, a spiking, but we have incredibly important psychological and also social vaccination aspects in this whole story. That means we must assume that very, very many people did not take this vaccination voluntarily but reacted with great fear, powerlessness and self-aggression, were under social pressure and were abused and traumatised. And I suspect that this post-vaccine syndrome and also post-Covid syndrome ultimately have a great deal to do with post-traumatic stress disorder. Thank you for your attention.

3:29:00Thank you very much, dear Christian, for shedding light with this talk on this important aspect of the Covid pandemic, or perhaps one should say the Corona agenda. Thank you very, very much, and with that I move on to the next speaker. He has dealt a great deal with the background of this "plandemic", as he calls it, also

3:29:27especially in his book "Game Over" he of course uncovers much of the background. I look forward to your talk, dear Heiko. Heiko, you still need to unmute. Yes, warm thanks, Ronny, and warm greetings to all viewers here now from the north. I will give a short talk and share my screen for it. Perhaps first: Covid-19 was demonstrably pre-planned; it is a plandemic. Criminals had a plan for this worldwide fraud. The following short talk sheds light on two of these criminals: first, the forewarned doctor and brigadier general Dr Richard Tubb, and second, Michael A. McManus Jr., a director of the vaccine company Novavax for Covid and formerly involved in drug and arms trafficking. So, and very important: today we have a rather scientific, medical focus. Deception and camouflage are an integral part of military as well as criminal planning. The current medical research methodology on the causes of disease neglects organised crime.

3:30:57Fraud as a possibility should always be included in diagnostics and in aetiology too. That is very important. We do a great many details and so on and so forth, but one thing is blanked out: the possibility of fraud and organised crime. So, and I will now share my screen, with feedback on whether it works, whether a large screen, a slide, can now be seen. Ronny, can you perhaps confirm?

3:31:43It's visible, yes. Thank you. Good, so, a short, clear message: criminals planned this worldwide fraud, and the good thing is that the evidence, really court-proof evidence, is in this book, "Game Over: Covid-19, Anthrax-01". For those who don't know yet: I actually predicted this plandemic that we all know as Covid-19, publicly, in a long interview in September 2019; it can still be viewed at apolut.net under my name, and I had the draft of the book on the table there too. But the book itself is being obstructed wherever possible. So, briefly in English too, since this is also being broadcast internationally today. The important thing is, let's make it simple: do you know Michael A.

3:32:44McManus? Michael A. McManus Jr. is a director of Novavax, a Covid-19 vaccine manufacturer, and before that he was in drug and arms trafficking: heroin, cocaine, combat helicopters. That clear, that simple. And you see here on the page how he is shaking hands with Ronald Reagan, and Ronald Reagan was brought into the presidency with the help of the Mafia. Yes, and what is the source? German public television, Das Erste: actually an Arte documentary that was also broadcast on ARD, Das Erste. I am aware that for many it is very threatening and perhaps surprising that organised crime exists on this world scale. Indeed, here: Ronald Reagan was lifted into the presidency with the help of the Mafia, and even German public television itself admitted that a few years ago, and Michael McManus was a staff member in Ronald Reagan's White House.

3:34:04Here briefly some sources for this too. There is a court, for example here one of several court files is given, where you can also read how deeply Michael McManus was entangled in the cocaine trade, for example, and it's also quite interesting because he belonged to the circle of dealers who supplied the mother of the current Canadian prime minister Trudeau with cocaine. Yes, it's true, the mother of the Canadian prime minister was addicted to cocaine, and she was then the First Lady of Canada, because the father had also been prime minister of Canada. You can read this in this court file

3:35:21with audio, in ten different languages, this detailed talk is available, and of course in the book "Game Over" too. So, this is really explosive, and does the state, so to speak, simply put up with it? Doesn't it strike back? Yes, not only is the book obstructed, but when Michael McManus was named in Switzerland too at the end of last year, the fact-checkers came, the German Press Agency and also Mimikama, and here I've quickly shown it; you can see it on mimikama.org. They said: yes, Michael McManus is not a director of Novavax, and they

3:36:22of course I secured the evidence. You won't find it any more on Novavax's current home page, but Michael McManus was a director of Novavax. So much for the fact checks. The fact-checkers are clearly lying here: is not a director. Here you see he is a director, and I also have it with picture and name from the American securities regulator, the SEC. That simply has to be said. So do you really want an arms and drug dealer to produce your vaccine? Well. And I plead here once more: we must make it simpler. Immunology is great, but it is too complicated for

3:37:18Pfizer produces the mRNA vaccine today, we know that, and he also went back to Pfizer as vice president, and then he became a director of Novavax. Bill Gates is also involved in it, and they produce Corona vaccine. So, the book "Game Over" also has a clear visual language, because we need it internationally and more clearly, and so I propose four graphic elements here that run through the book: persons in rectangular card format, institutes such as companies in round chip format, and preceding actions in dice format, all drawn on a nine men's morris board, that is, a network. These four graphic elements are a systematic aid, and you see them here. There is also a clear assignment with symbols and numbers, and the institutions are also assigned a unique number. It is important that, in medicine too, we really have the approach once again: fraud, fraud in play, and that is actually the case here on a worldwide scale.

3:38:41The whole networks are also described in the book. Today I want to present one person by whom you can see quite clearly that there was criminal foreknowledge not only of Covid-19 but also of an earlier crime with anthrax in September 2001, and that is this person, the doctor and brigadier general Dr Richard Tubb. So, and just very briefly, if you're still thinking: September 2001, how was that again? Right, those were the attacks, yes, we all know them, but letters were also sent out with a bioweapon, a real bioweapon, yes. And the first letter arrived at a media company on 8 September 2001, that is, before, and a reporter, Robert Stevens, was infected. The incubation period is up to 43 days; the doctors and scientists know what I mean, don't they?

3:40:17So the time, the incubation period, from infection to the first clinical signs of illness, up to 43 days, and Robert Stevens was only diagnosed on 4 October; only at that point could one assume a bioweapon attack, not before; otherwise one would have criminal foreknowledge. He died shortly afterwards. Well, and what did Dr Richard Tubb do? Three weeks earlier, on the day of 11 September, he gave the antidote to anthrax, namely the drug ciprofloxacin, and thus he clearly had criminal foreknowledge. Here once again shown briefly in graphic form: indeed on the day of 11 September, George Bush's personal physician, Tubb, gives the whole government team ciprofloxacin, and that is perpetrator knowledge, yes, because only much later, only on 4 October, was it known that this was the case. And now one can ask: well, was it only prophylactic? Did he perhaps do it only as a precaution? No, not really, because ciprofloxacin has been shown to cause hallucinations, psychological, psychotic reactions, anxiety states, depression, agitation and much, much more, and you don't want that for the people at the nuclear warheads, do you? Yes, and even vomiting, diarrhoea, diarrhoea 44 per cent at this high dosage. Well, that makes it clear why it was anthrax of all things and not 50 others, yes. And he has also clearly admitted that.

3:42:07Yes, but what does this have to do with Corona? In 2013 the brigadier general and doctor Tubb went to a tobacco company, British American Tobacco, and in 2014 it bought a vaccine manufacturer there that produces Corona vaccine from genetically modified tobacco plants. The second-largest, the largest tobacco company, Philip Morris, also has a wholly owned subsidiary that [produces] Corona vaccine from

3:42:48genetically modified tobacco plants. Yes, and here you see quickly to finish a slide from the original presentation of Kentucky BioProcessing; you see here they say: today we still make cigarettes from tobacco plants; tomorrow we will make vaccine from them. And that tomorrow has arrived. Medicago has an authorisation for Corona vaccine from tobacco plants. And why is that important? Because we simply have to see: in the past millions of people were vaccinated; today, as we have learned from the good previous speakers, billions of people have already been vaccinated. Well, then you need the production capacity, and the advantage of this technology is that you can produce millions of vaccine doses per week with it, and that is a very important advantage, and that's why it was prepared in advance, because you don't just build a factory in a year. We all thought, and I did too: they can't pull that off, producing the vaccine in a year at all; that's

3:44:1819, 19 was pre-planned; it is a plandemic; criminals planned this worldwide fraud. And please, we must concentrate on this: the evidence is in this book; it is being suppressed. You can see the sources at wirkraft.net; the enclosed DVDs also contain the interview in which I predicted it from September 2019, and also our extra-parliamentary Corona investigative committee, not to be confused with the other lawyers' committee. We gave interviews there very early on, with Sucharit Bhakdi and Martin Haditsch, who will speak later today; it is recorded, it is proven. And so I'm also glad that good lawyers like Philipp Kruse from Switzerland are really going after it and doing something. The legal route, I can say in conclusion, will not get us further, because what we have to do, if we know the criminals are known, criminals, yes, we are many and we must inform people. Warm thanks.

3:45:52Thank you, dear Heiko, for these fascinating presentations. That it is a plandemic, most of us who deal with this suspect and know, but the true background, or the background you presented, I think very few people know. It was exciting to have it presented. Thank you very much. And I ask the control room to show picture number 20.

3:46:17Picture number 20, please. Here I would like to draw attention to a campaign by the journalist, computer scientist and peace activist Andrea Drescher and Wolfgang Süß as programmer, a campaign for which we need your signatures. On the website wir-fordern.eu it demands the full rehabilitation of the victims instead of society protecting the perpetrators. It is not a petition; it really is about demands. The heading is: the time is ripe for truth and justice. And of the seven demands I would like to read you three: comprehensive reappraisal and clear legal consequences for those who caused the damage, drawing on their private assets; repeal of all laws and ordinances from this period and introduction of control mechanisms to reliably prevent the systematic erosion of fundamental rights under the pretext of a disaster in future. Philipp Kruse will tell us something about this in a moment too, how important it is that we take precautions; the WHO is up to no good. And public recognition of the courage of all who, out of inner conviction, accepted threats and state reprisals is also one of the demands. So you can do good by going to this website and giving your signature. Thank you, thank you, and with this I move on to part two: what is to be done from a legal point of view? And

3:47:55the first talk will be given by a Swiss lawyer; Heiko Schöning has just announced him too: Philipp Kruse. He has been a lawyer in Zurich, Switzerland, since 1996, but comes from Germany. Together with, practically, his law partner Markus Zollinger, on 14 July 2022, on behalf of so far, as far as I have been able to read, six people allegedly harmed by the Covid vaccination and 37 other persons, he filed a criminal complaint against those responsible at the Swiss regulatory authority Swissmedic, the equivalent of the EMA or FDA, and against vaccinating doctors at the Inselspital in Bern, and on 14 November he presented the status of the proceedings at a media conference in Zurich at the airport, the current status and how things will proceed.

3:48:49He will report on this today, and he will also give a double talk, because he will also report on the truly threatening plans of the WHO, which is currently meeting in Geneva with representatives of the member states, about two things: on the one hand a pandemic agreement that is to give the WHO the sole right worldwide in matters of pandemic measures, and how far it will go Philipp Kruse will surely explain, and on the other hand changes to the so-called IHR, the International Health Regulations, where practically the set of rules is to be changed, and of all things the term human dignity is to be deleted from Article 3 of these regulations. That should make us all sit up, but now to Philipp. Greetings; I'm curious what you have to report.

3:49:37Dear Philipp, thank you very much, dear Ronny, thank you very much for the invitation, and I'm also very grateful for the interest shown to me here, at 9:54 p.m. How many minutes do I have, so that I can plan accordingly? I think, since you are giving a double talk, you're welcome to fill 20 minutes, because the part about the WHO will certainly be exciting. Good, may I share my screen? May I share my screen? That should work. Good, can you see the screen? Yes, very good. Good, so I'll start, 20 minutes, so I'll be finished at 14 minutes past [10]. Ready, steady, go. Yes, thank you very much for the kind introduction; it was all correct, and given the short time I'll start straight away, as soon as my mouse is on the right screen. So, two topics: Switzerland update, criminal complaint against Swissmedic, and WHO power expansion: how can you recognise it, what can we do about it? On the first topic, the criminal complaint in Switzerland: I don't want my talk

3:51:11sentence has been said. Of course it is, but it forms, so to speak, the starting point for all our work, whether in the medical or the legal field. Nevertheless, despite knowing this fact, we are still dealing with fundamental questions, for example because of this statement by a Swiss federal councillor in January 2022. So we actually have a Swiss federal councillor who told us: anyone who has a car accident and dies and then tests positive for Corona counts as a Corona death. That is the background against which we in Switzerland operate too. At the time the presenter asked: is that really so, Federal Councillor? And here the keyword: yes, it is so; it has to be counted that way because the WHO prescribes it. Just as

3:52:15three years, on the criminal complaint against Swissmedic. Very briefly up front: of course the presumption of innocence applies, even if I myself, on the basis of the evidence I have seen, am personally convinced of the opposite. But one always has to put that first. Also up front: this criminal complaint has been published in full; here is the link, and on this home page you will find the criminal complaint as well as the evidence in the form of the executive, sorry, the evidence in the form of the evidence report, and you will also find everything we made available to the media. What was it about? We filed it on 14 July 2022, correctly mentioned by you, Ronny Weikl, and because nothing happened, nothing at all for months, we decided on 14

3:53:10November to hold a media conference to inform the public about what we were doing, namely the largest criminal complaint ever filed against a Swiss authority, and here I specify: the complaint is already directed within Swissmedic against the responsible persons, of course. And it is very important to understand that, strictly speaking, this criminal complaint consists of two types of complaints: on the one hand the criminal complaint of six vaccine victims against the authority Swissmedic, or rather the responsible persons, I'll come to that in more detail shortly, and secondly, a second level, the criminal complaint of these six vaccine victims against the vaccinating doctors. I'll limit myself to the first part, and the core, I have mentioned it on other occasions, the reasoning is, and here I say up front: in Switzerland we have the special situation, compared with Germany and the USA, that within our jurisdiction we have a single competent authority responsible for authorisation, for monitoring, product monitoring, pharmacovigilance, and for information, all based on the Swiss Therapeutic Products Act. And that of course makes it somewhat easier, or rather makes it possible at all, in contrast to the situation in Germany,

3:54:44to bring such a criminal complaint for serious breach of statutory duties of care with regard to the authorisation of ineffective and unsafe experimental substances, with regard to continuous disinformation of the population about the actual effect of these substances, and even falsification of documents. We asserted that because the medicinal product information enclosed with every vaccine substance is not sufficient; it is disinformative; it lacks important information on long-term side effects, and above all the unsuitable, completely unsuitable system for recording vaccine injuries, vaccine side effects, all with harmful effects on the health of the Swiss population, and the persons responsible face up to ten years in prison. In our extensive evidence report we compiled all the risk factors; here only the most important, very schematically, meant to show that along the timeline the authority of course had to recognise that new danger signals were continually becoming apparent; it ignored them all, and instead of withdrawing the authorisations it even extended them. I'll skip the allegations, because it is certainly of interest to learn what the state of the proceedings is, and here too I'll limit myself to the vaccine victims. We also filed the criminal complaint for 37 complainants who themselves

3:56:28did not have victim status. So here the victims, on the one hand against the doctors, are victims in four different cantons, and I can announce here for the first time that the jurisdiction of the cantonal public prosecutors has meanwhile been clarified in all four cantons, that in one canton we were able to attend a first hearing, and that we were also able to talk for three quarters of an hour with the responsible public prosecutor about the proceedings, and we had the impression that, regarding these proceedings, the prosecutor had fully understood what it was about. The statements of the vaccine victim could not have been clearer, on the one hand regarding the severity of the damage, wheelchair immediately after the third injection, and on the other regarding the completely unsuitable, non-existent information before these substances were administered. Like many others, she had simply registered at a vaccination centre via the website without receiving any information about the long-term and possibly serious side effects to be expected. It is different with Swissmedic itself; that is the main subject of our criminal complaint, of course also the main target, and here jurisdiction is still not clarified. It should be the Office of the Attorney General, and here we have meanwhile followed up and have strengthened our reasoning as to why it must be the Office of the Attorney General,

3:58:07we have strengthened it, but we are also additionally strengthening our evidence report, in order to make the need for swift action clear to everyone and not to create the impression that we just gave it a try and are no longer interested. And in the context of this update we are again doing our utmost here, and I would like to take this opportunity to say that I have a whole team; part of the team could be seen at the media conference on 14 November 2022. Very important to me is the former deputy public prosecutor Dr Markus Zollinger, who has been working practically exclusively for a year on drafting the criminal complaint and the entire evidence report, together with a research assistant; that is practically their only job, and that has only been possible because we are also receiving support from people who see themselves personally threatened by the maintenance of these authorisations. So here we are following up massively; we have also received great support from scientists who are listening right now, who are among you, including Professor Bhakdi regarding the technology per se, that this technology is anything but

3:59:42and many more. Now, ultimately we also want to tell taxpayers that they have financed a very expensive non-value here; these substances are worthless; one must not buy things that have no value and, on the contrary, even represent risks, and ultimately we demand the withdrawal of the authorisations. A second important goal is to make the vaccine victims themselves visible and to support them. In all our countries we must get to the point where vaccine injuries are recognised, where vaccine victims receive rapid help and compensation from the state, where they don't have to hire lawyers to get help by a costly route, and that is why we will also add further vaccine victims to our criminal complaint. So much for that, and now I move on to the second topic, the WHO.

4:00:49So here we see, starting from the mRNA problem: the entire population is still deceived, those who have not yet woken up, and there is no end in sight, no end in sight, as long as someone from the WHO like Tedros issues the motto that 70% of all people must be vaccinated against Covid, even after these disastrous pharmacovigilance reports, after these disastrous results we find in all countries; that is still the motto. That is why we still have a big problem; we also have a big legal problem; the Nuremberg Code is the keyword, and this Nuremberg Code is also codified at UN level in the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. In 1966 the intention there was to banish such terrible misdeeds from the globe once and for all, for all time; it is in the torture article, and it says quite clearly: in particular, no one shall be subjected without his free consent to medical or scientific experimentation. This provision also applies in war, but not to perpetrators. That is why we really do have a problem with the WHO, which is quite astonishing if you look at its original objective. Article 1 of the WHO constitution could hardly be more positive. It is about health and about, first of all, doing no harm, "nihil nocere". What applies to the doctor

4:02:28also applies to a health authority, and that means harm should be kept away from the civilian population, from the economy, and you do that by regularly re-examining your methods, re-examining the patients, the people, the risk situation, doing it all on an evidence basis, and because to err is human, this regular review is needed. And the WHO wants nothing to do with this regular review. I'm looking at the clock: about eight minutes now. Good, and what we must always take as the starting point for assessing the forthcoming changes is a look back at the last three years. Only if we analyse the last three years quite soberly, which I am greatly abbreviating here, only then can we roughly gauge what effects the planned changes to the health regulations and the new pandemic treaty will have, and we have to note that over the last three years at no point was there any real interest in the question of how dangerous the pathogen really is, whether the threat is decreasing or increasing, and how good the measurement methods are. Accordingly, since the beginning of Covid-19, since January or February 2020, we still have this public health emergency of international concern. We are still living in pandemic status, and here we see in this overview that the WHO has even maintained several such pandemic states, public health emergencies, under various titles,

4:04:14to this day. Polio, for example, is still running. And thus the first allegation: that all WHO pandemic declarations since February 2020 are based exclusively on this unsuitable method, that autopsies were prohibited, and medical examinations. One must never restrict the whole world like that and impose coercive measures on people and, at the end of the day, even vaccinations that aren't vaccinations. And that means, looking back, I have to summarise very heavily: so far we have experienced three years, or two and a half years, of a de facto, latent health dictatorship. And how will this continue into the future? On this diagram, I would say, we have two instruments.

4:05:10Let me try to show it a bit more simply. Here, this is exactly what they look like. If you go on the internet, you can actually already find concrete proposals for the International Health Regulations, for the amendments to the International Health Regulations. You have to know that these are health regulations already adopted by the World Health Assembly in 2005 and which entered into force in most countries in 2007, on the question: what obligations do states have in the context of pandemics? What obligations do they have, and very prominently, above all, the question: from when does pandemic status apply? This question, from when such a public health emergency of international concern applies, is regulated here in Article 12. That is, in a way, the linchpin for the special powers of the WHO that come into force as soon as such a public health emergency of international concern is declared, and it is declared by the Director-General. Now, you have to know that this is only one of these two treaties or instruments currently under discussion. In this case we are talking about proposed amendments, because the existing health regulations, as I said, have existed since 2007. And here the most prominent proposed amendment has already been anticipated by Ronny Weikl. We see here in Article 3 of these International

4:07:00Health Regulations, rightly noted, an incredible proposal by now; that it is even proposed. Of course we are all aware that it is only a proposal; it does not yet have legal force. But that a health authority even dares to make such a proposal, so let's look:

4:07:38dares to publish such a text in the context of an organisation in whose own constitution, in Article 1, the health and all-round well-being of people stands above everything. That shows where things are heading; it shows the spirit these people have, and the newspapers can deny for as long as they like that it isn't meant that way: that is still what it says in these current proposals, in the health regulations. Another change, an adjustment, is that the proposals, the recommendations, are increasingly to become binding. Rightly we all say: they were already binding before; states adhered to them, even though the word wasn't crossed out. In future this word "non-binding" is to be crossed out. That means the recommendations will become even more binding than they already were, and in this sense all these proposals go in the same direction: they are to give the WHO even more powers; states will be more restricted in their powers.

4:08:53Here an article dealing with the question: how much time do states have available to make a pandemic or epidemic notification themselves? A health minister has 72 hours, from the moment of the first event of a new disease to notification to the WHO: 72 hours. That will of course lead health ministers, so as not to get it wrong, to report one virus too many rather than one too few. And so it goes on, and in the end we have, what do we have? The expansion of a self-empowerment mechanism. That is a terrible word, I'm aware, given German history, but technically it is nothing else. This Article 12, I stand by this at any time, and with a bit more time I would of course justify it much better, but this Article 12, which in its concrete form has this Annex 2 and is to make it even easier for the Director-General, sorry, for the Director-General to declare this emergency, is in effect a self-empowerment mechanism. And with that I already come to the end of these proposed amendments: in summary, this emergency can be declared at any time and for a trivial reason. It is possible for the WHO to extend it permanently, which it is already doing. There is no stop button, there is no transparency at all, no control, no accountability, and the WHO

4:10:38can, with its recommendations, and here too a great many new instruments are being created for what the WHO is to be able and allowed to do, the WHO can intervene in all areas of life. Here it is important to understand that by declaring this international health emergency, the WHO, with the stroke of a pen, simultaneously abolishes sovereignty, the separation of powers, the rule of law, fundamental rights, and of course democratic participation and free information in all WHO states. That is an outrage of the very highest historical magnitude. I've already used up my time, so I can only say verbally what we have to do about it: first of all we must inform our fellow citizens, based on papers as comprehensible as possible, which they can all expect from us lawyers. We have to provide these in an understandable way in the near future. Secondly, we have our representatives in the parliaments, the few who are still awake, who still feel responsible; we must bring them on board so that they intervene, on no account to take part in these negotiations, because in my personal view it is

4:12:20to give up the population without any possibility of control, to give it up permanently; that is profoundly unconstitutional, no matter which country we live in, and one must intervene. And of course, thirdly, we lawyers are especially called upon here. We must join forces; we must prominently ensure that this information gets into the media. Personally I cannot imagine that all media professionals who have supported the measures so far would also support such a regime permanently in future. Because we must not forget: after the Second World War a peace order was established on the basis of the UN Charter, and in the sense and spirit of the UN Charter, which placed the right of self-determination, the self-determination of peoples and the fundamental rights of human beings at the very centre. And with a regime like the one now before us, this peace order, the self-determination of peoples and the fundamental rights of human beings threaten to become the exception, an exception we have to beg for, plead for, get vaccinated for, and that cannot be in anyone's interest. That is why we must inform ourselves, we must bring the people's representatives on board, and we lawyers are called upon. And now I've already overrun; I apologise for that, and I am hereby at the end of my already heavily abridged presentation, and I'm looking for the thank-you slide

4:14:02at the end, but yes, I think, so that I don't deny anyone anything, I'll simply cut it short here and try to stop sharing. Good, thank you very much for your attention. And so in all countries, that they finally stand up and support us and remember what the legal provisions of the individual countries are and what they stand for, and of course the journalists too, who should invoke the press code again. Only in this way can we inform people, and everyone in the police and military too should take a look at why they actually do their job and whom they have to protect. Thank you once again, and we stay in Switzerland: the next speaker is, so to speak, a rising star among the Corona whistleblowers, of what we have all practically been able to learn over three years now. I just wanted to say again about Philipp Kruse, I researched it again: the pandemic was declared by the WHO on 11 March 2020, and that is now two years, eleven months, 18 days, so 1,085 days in total, and I

4:15:53come to the next speaker. He is a Swiss businessman, investment banker, successful film producer and also a former government adviser in crisis situations. Out of concern for his 80-year-old mother, Pascal Najadi had himself injected three times with the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine. His awakening experience was 10 October last year, 2022, as he described it to me. Janine Small, I ask for picture number 21 to be shown, please. So Janine Small, the Pfizer representative, thank you very much, he witnessed her questioning in the EU Parliament, and there she said on camera, she was very taciturn on many questions and mostly kept quiet, but she did answer the critical questions, namely to the question whether the Pfizer vaccine had ever been tested for preventing transmission of the virus, she said that this was not the case, and that is really a shock, and Pascal Najadi, he told me, was stunned, because that had been the argument of those advocating compulsory vaccination the whole time, and he immediately

4:17:20got moving. She announced, namely what the CDC had discovered in a study a few days earlier, that people vaccinated against Covid-19 can spread the coronavirus just as much as the unvaccinated, and that then triggered a cascade of reactions, and Pascal Najadi dared to go to his police station and [file a complaint against] the Swiss Federal President, who is also the Federal Councillor for Home Affairs and thus, so to speak, also the federal health minister,

4:17:50proceedings, how this criminal complaint will proceed, and Pascal Najadi will probably also tell us a few other things and make other contributions on the topic of the WHO; he has some very interesting things to report, and I look forward to your talk, dear Pascal. Yes, hello. Just a moment, I have to, can you hear me? Hello, can you hear me? Yes, all good. Hello, dear Ronny, hello, dear friends and defenders of humanity, doctors, lawyers, scientists; it is an honour to be here. So, I'm speaking right now from Linz, in Austria, from my hotel room. Tomorrow I'll be on AUF1, the channel AUF1, in the studio with Stefan Magnet, and will say the same thing again. So, regarding the criminal complaint: it is now with the Office of the Attorney General in Bern; I made the last submissions with a deadline of 22

4:18:56January. There are now four criminal offences, four criminal articles that were grossly violated and proven; causality is established. The first, which is known, is abuse of office, because after Virginie Masserey of the BAG, the Federal Office of Public Health, said on 3 August 2021 that the vaccination does not, so to speak, work, three months later Alain Berset, who is now President of Switzerland and still health minister, said

4:19:44that they are not contagious, so. And that was the trigger. I documented it on one page, the famous one page; the memo went to the police, was filed, and it is now with the Office of the Attorney General in Bern. I am in written contact with the responsible federal prosecutor, the federal public prosecutor; communication is good, it's serious. I have the good impression that the justice system is working, and for that reason I don't want to go into the details of the other three offences. I ask for your understanding, but you can imagine roughly which ones they will be. I also proved it at cantonal level, cantonal doctors, because it is about having to give informed consent, in writing, after having read the possible side effects on the same paper: heart attack, thrombosis, turbo cancer and so on, and you have to sign: "I have understood this, here is my signature", and that then goes into my medical record for ten years. That was not done, and I proved it, because the cantonal doctor could not hand me this document on request, written request, and so on and so forth. So the matter is under way; the whole world is now looking at this criminal complaint, and I would like to add: the presumption of innocence applies to Alain Berset, the President of Switzerland. These are ongoing criminal proceedings at the highest level, and I don't want to play judge, and I

4:21:29am not a public prosecutor either; I am a private complainant, I am an injured party. So are my wife and my mother. Fortunately we have had no side effects so far, but yesterday I had myself tested by another method. I am, if you like, irradiated. I also did tests today on the plane from Zurich to Vienna at 30,000 feet. There were perhaps 80 passengers; I found 300, I repeat, 300 routers and RFID transmitters. So I am a walking antenna, and I looked up the patent specifications; I found new ones, these transceivers are as small as one nanometre, IBM. That is science-fiction technology, okay. What is it connected with? I would now like

4:22:34[a document] to everyone, please, one moment, I need to see how I do this now. Sorry. Chat, I'll send it to you in the chat, because otherwise I couldn't get the slide. To everyone, please look at this now and please understand it correctly. It's going to everyone now; can you open it? May I say something briefly, Pascal? Perhaps the control room can open it and then show it; that would be ideal if you can't share your screen, because we are broadcasting it. The viewers can, everyone can do it themselves, press in the chat and it's in there. Although the viewers are following on channels and not via chats; only the speakers are in the chats, that's the problem. But perhaps OVALmedia's control room can manage it; thank you.

4:23:30So what you see here is the legal, absolute consequence if the WHO CA+ treaty and the WHO IHR, also called the International Health Regulations, are signed. The WHO is planning and carrying out a coup d'état. It is a takeover of power over 194 states in lockstep, evidently in coordination with current dignitaries of these states. That is very, very dangerous, and I will also predict that the mass media are part of it; they will not report on it, and

4:24:27all instruments of the state are handed over to the WHO, including the executive, police, military. I have information from London from a member of parliament, I am also English, that the British army has a live-ammunition marching order from March, that's tomorrow. I heard the same from Paris, directly from a commander, and the same already went through in Germany under the cover of NATO readiness last October. For Italy I only know from a journalist; I have no direct information. What the WHO is now planning is a pandemic. One can assume that people were and are being conditioned for Marburg; that's ridiculous, because there are only 167 cases of Marburg, mostly in Africa or only in Africa, and it only transmits if you touch the corpse and rub your eyes and so on and so forth. It's not volatile or anything, but they want to create absolute terror, and it will be triggered by 5G. I have information from America from people in the army who are close to us and have been informing us at high speed for two weeks now: the 5G antennas have no other purpose; they were set up only for this moment, because the symptoms will be triggered by 5G, through the chips we have in our bodies, and that goes as far as nosebleeds and coughing and shivers and chills and so on. So that will come if the WHO manages

4:26:17to sign these treaties and have them voted on. And as things look, Philipp Kruse already mentioned Article 3; it is still being negotiated. That means no state has said: "Stop, that's not possible; you can't maintain a constitution without human rights." Then

4:26:44we know from Geneva. To this day, I have phoned Geneva, there has been no intervention, no stop; none of the states involved wants to change this deletion of human rights. It's all going very fast now; the WHO was caught out by Covid; they tried to kill more people. It is a planned, rapid mass murder that is now under way. The vaccine doses, these injections, are already in warehouses, including the syringes. These are bioweapons; they have nothing to do with vaccination or medicine. The US military owns all the factories worldwide, and most in NATO states, that produce these vials. The Moderna or Pfizer label goes on top, and then it's the so-called compulsory vaccine, and you can imagine the rest, what that means for humanity. It is humanity's last battle; the WHO is the weapon, and one has to say that it is a conspiracy against humanity that is now under way. There is no other way to put it, and the sooner you grasp it the better, because you can't gloss over it, by no means. It's no longer about lipids or spike proteins; it's about only one thing: the WHO must be stopped. And what have I done about it? Dr Astrid Stuckelberger and I were sworn in, we

4:28:30a tribunal registered in Washington State, the Tribunal for Natural and Common Law for Health, and now I've lost the thread, for Humanity. We have pronounced a judgment, a verdict; it was recorded on 26 February, a few days ago; it is on video, you can watch it, and so from our side the verdict is legally binding. The 237-page statement of claim was sent by registered mail to Tedros at the WHO, and today the indictment was served by email on all heads of state involved, all organisations. We have the email addresses of all heads of state and ministers and organisations involved, and all are indicted. And now you ask yourselves: what kind of executive? We have called on all militaries, police forces and special forces worldwide to take action. We are working in America; the military in America are positioning themselves; the DOD is already under Tedros's thumb, I learned that yesterday, but the special forces will stand up for the people.

4:30:03What I am telling you here is very dramatic; it is not a conspiracy theory, unfortunately. I have an uncensored channel, because last week the WHO, the WHO blocked my YouTube channel, because it is afraid of me. That is a third blow. I'm not otherwise afraid, but it shows you what power it has, to block a YouTube channel operator like me in Switzerland who really only had professors and lawyers in interviews.

4:30:40What this is about: it is the last blow, and Astrid Stuckelberger and I are united; we are represented on the tribunal; we have also received an ID so that we cannot be captured. We're not afraid because of it either; we do our job, and we now have very strong support from America, from the American patriots, who have realised what this is about. America sold its constitution last week, and I have to say that the Americans are now getting going, and a lot is happening now in the United States for the freedom of humanity. And the Ukraine war is a pure distraction; nothing will happen there. The real genocide, which will be handed out very quickly afterwards: these new injections will not be the weak stuff we have now; from what I've heard, they will be mixed with ricin. That is a completely different dimension, and I don't need to tell you any more; I don't want to either; it's a topic that is so dark, but I had to tell you, today and now, because tomorrow on AUF1, on the Austrian channel, I'll say it again for the Austrians who can still be saved. Germany, I think, is lost; you see what the fascists are doing

4:32:25and so on. If this is not stopped, we will stop it, I can promise you that. Exactly how, I can't tell you, but everything will happen this year. It is the absolute year of truth for humanity. And as a last point I'd like to say that you have to believe in yourself, believe in God. The hour has come when we turn inwards and protect our souls, and I would like to say to everyone: Godspeed, God bless you, and we have a lot to do and to inform people about, but it won't be easy. We will win, that's for sure.

4:33:08Dear Pascal, very moving words, very clear words. Thank you for giving us, so to speak, the opportunity to be among the first to receive this explosive information here. Thank you for being so open, and I wish you and this project, together with many others, every success. I know you are well networked internationally, and I'm also convinced it will turn out well. Every success from our side, and very exciting, and you have said out loud what many probably don't dare to say, but we must realise more and more that

4:33:54I give, and a lawyer has asked himself this question, and of course a few other lawyers too, but we have invited one as a speaker today: Tobias Ulbrich, a lawyer from Düsseldorf; he has a great deal of experience with these topics; he has prepared for this for a long time and has a large number of people wishing to sue whom he represents, and I'm pleased to hear from him today how best to go about it in order to [compensate] people to some extent

4:35:06all very warmly at your screens, and of course thank you very, very much for the invitation. I would particularly like to thank Professors Kämmerer and Burkhardt, who have been supporting us intensively for some time in our efforts in the fight for the injured to sue for corresponding sums, but who have also already been active in other proceedings before the Federal Administrative Court, in the case of the two Bundeswehr soldiers. Wilfried may say a little more about that in a moment too, and yes, in any case it is great support that we receive from the medical side too. I

4:36:04as a law firm we were actually founded in 2007 and became known from 2015 with the diesel emissions scandal. We were a law firm of the very first hour there too; we filed the first lawsuits just one month after the emissions scandal was announced, and then gained our experience with the large corporation Volkswagen and co., and in the whole first year we lost pretty much everything except two civil suits, until we were also the first in Germany to obtain, on 17 January 2017, before the Hildesheim regional court, the first judgment for intentional immoral damage against Volkswagen AG, and

4:37:02founded a special-purpose company and, together with the VZBV, the Federation of German Consumer Organisations, conducted the model declaratory action, and faced considerable media headwind, just as now with the narratives. It was the same back then in the emissions scandal; it was given no prospect of success. Everyone knows the result: at the end of the day 265,000 injured parties received their payout, 840 million euros distributed among 265,000 injured parties, and that is why we are not afraid to take the field against large pharmaceutical companies either. We know that there too the gloves are off, and I would like, is slide 1 showing? Yes, the next slide, please.

4:37:58Yes, in any case we don't leave injured people in the lurch. We heard at the beginning what extreme psychological pressure this causes for clients, what a gauntlet they have run with doctors. They go from one doctor to the next, and one after another tells them: "There are no vaccine injuries here; you're only imagining it." In the end they are, so to speak, psychosomatic sleepwalkers with their vaccine injury and no longer even believe in themselves, in what they actually feel in their bodies and what is actually going on, and precisely in this system they are sent from doctor to doctor; each one then treats

4:38:50and I conduct ten initial consultations every day, and I can only invite every politician to come to my office once and listen to these conversations, to the misery that confronts you every day; it really goes right through you, and you simply can't imagine what is actually going on, yes. And that is why our aim is not only to help in the legal field, but also to ensure that, through contact with various doctors and groups of doctors, we create an opportunity to find doctors who are willing to consider the possibility that this could be a vaccine injury and who also offer appropriate treatment methods. The next slide, please.

4:39:46Yes, our team currently consists of four lawyers who are currently, so to speak, working on vaccine injuries. We also have strong software support from a partner company, Fastlaw, which has developed its own software to offer a large number of clients maximum possibilities for enforcing their rights with as much technical support as possible. Next slide, please. Yes, on the slide, I have to

4:40:31shown once; we did something similar to what the PEI and EMA do: clients submit their data and their individual injuries to us and fill in the corresponding forms. We collect the data exactly as the EMA and PEI do and then evaluate

4:41:01serious injuries that are recorded with us, and you can see them in the list. I don't know if I can make it bigger on my side, just a glance. There you can see illnesses, migraine, tremor, that's what we have. The next slide, please. It continues on the following page: Covid-19 too, it has already been mentioned that infectious diseases increasingly occur after the vaccination, seizure disorders, menstrual disorders, vascular disease, paralysis, lung diseases, vomiting, thromboses, brain diseases. That

4:42:01with a further 50 points. Naming the points individually any further at this point doesn't show the real suffering behind them, but I think many doctors who are present here can imagine it and have an idea of what I

4:42:37In civil law we have various defendants. On the one hand we have the vaccine manufacturers, whom you can hold liable, on the one hand under the Medicinal Products Act; section 84(1) is the basis for the claim there. And if it weren't for the already regular authorisation, for example for BioNTech, which was granted by the EU Commission on 10 October 2022 despite the ongoing phase 3 trial, there would also be the possibility of asserting claims via section 32 of the Genetic Engineering Act. Both are strict liability. The Genetic Engineering Act has an even stronger presumption of evidence, namely it presumes that, if corresponding health damage has occurred, it is based exclusively on the genetic engineering work.

4:43:35In this respect we suspect that the rapid granting of a final authorisation was intended to slam the door on the Genetic Engineering Act. In our lawsuits and in our replies and written submissions we do not speak of vaccines but of gene therapeutics, as has already been mentioned today. We also have further bases for claims that we can find in tort law, namely section 826 of the Civil Code, which is intentional immoral damage. It is completely clear that anyone who brings out an ineffective substance that only causes harm falls into the category of section 5 of the Medicinal Products Act, namely a dangerous medicinal product coming onto the market,

4:44:29which can be classified as intentional immoral damage. In addition there are tort claims connected with corresponding criminal provisions. For that we don't even need to reach into the intent box; it already begins with negligent bodily harm, up to grievous bodily harm and other intentional offences. So the range of bases for claims is broad. We have currently received three proceedings from the Cologne regional court with indicative orders. In their indicative orders, at least, they currently consider only a claim under section 84(1) of the Medicinal Products Act to have been conclusively presented. Then there is the other defendant, the vaccinating doctors, and they cannot hide behind the so-called Spahn ordinance, the MedBVSV, as some claim either, because the doctors are still liable. As a law firm we do not sue the doctors, because we still hope they will recognise, if we don't sue them and only the actual perpetrators, namely the manufacturers and developers of these gene therapeutics, that greater support can be expected from the medical profession.

4:45:56run. On the one hand, people were not informed about the conditional authorisation at the time of vaccination. That follows from EC Regulation 507/2006; it is already stated in recital 10 of the preamble that the vaccinee must be informed about the conditional authorisation, and here it was subject to the condition that proof of the safety of the substances could be provided only in future. And furthermore, people were of course not informed about the further side effects, all of which were already known to the manufacturer BioNTech. You know the corresponding lawsuit under the Freedom of Information Act that ran in Texas. The documents were released there, including a document corresponding to the [periodic safety] reports for the EMA. That was submitted to the FDA on 30 April

4:46:532021, and it contains page after page of vaccine injuries found after vaccination, all of which in my view should have been part of a corresponding risk disclosure. But I don't think any doctor heard about it, nor, so to speak, the public. In this area, basically, there was no correct information at all, and against that background no effective consent to the treatment was given either, with the consequence that the doctor is subsequently liable for the bodily harm that was committed. Yes, then we have another area that is studiously overlooked and not widely publicised either. Germans are insurance fanatics and like to have insurance. So an incredible number of people have accident insurance, and the older policies did not exclude vaccine injuries. That means there is always a sum, 100% disability, and on that basis the amount would then have to be paid that the accident insurer has to calculate, the amount due according to the degree of disability. They like to orientate themselves, and here the next slide please:

4:48:26they like to orientate themselves by the pension and benefits offices of the respective federal states under section 60 of the Infection Protection Act. These issue so-called determination notices, in which the degree of disability due to the vaccination, that is, the degree determined and how severely the vaccination restricts the person's health, is at the same time the degree of disability that is decisive for the accident insurance. So, and now: shame on anyone who thinks ill of it, why suddenly applications under section 60 of the Infection Protection Act are being rejected so widely and quickly. The background is that they don't want to burden the accident insurance.

4:49:16of the federal states, above all from Bavaria. Mr Söder might want to look into that himself and see what nonsense is going on there. It's beyond belief. Yes, then we also have the segment where the injured have to fight with their long-term care insurers, because paralysis and neurological damage often progress relatively quickly, and then third-party support is quickly needed, and there too it is very, very difficult with the care levels to get a corresponding classification and help quickly. If you have no relatives, I can tell you, it is simply a catastrophe. Yes, then it continues with the dispute with the health insurers. Doctors can tell you a thing or two about that themselves: treatment methods such as apheresis, immunoadsorption and so on; the statutory and private health insurers strictly refuse to pay for them.

4:50:21You get rejection notices saying these are not treatments necessary for healing. Yes, that's the overview of the civil law area for now. Then the next slide, please. Then

4:50:42we have, which also includes that, beyond death, so to speak, relatives can obtain all documents and that the release from confidentiality applies beyond death. We have substantial problems getting them to hand over the documents if such documents do not exist, and even when they do exist we don't get the necessary information, and the individual federal states are also quite stubborn about handing anything over at all. Then we have the costs of clearing a household, health costs, inheritance disputes, yes, also disputes with legal expenses insurers. In recent weeks we have also had many macabre accounts from bereaved relatives. I can hardly believe it; it wasn't just one, there were eight in total who got in touch, complaining and crying on the phone that the notification of their relative's death had been delivered to them, so to speak, together with the urn. That is, the public prosecutor had ordered cremation, and the evidence, the body, was no longer available for further autopsy and histological findings. Yes, then as a further point we have loss of maintenance, disputes with the bank, yes, about accessing accounts, getting follow-up financing for the house when you lose one of the main earners in the family. You can't imagine

4:52:46everything this can entail. Yes, what do we need from clients? We need their vaccination card, because that is the document. We don't need the certificates from those electronic things. We need their own account of the course of their health after vaccination. We also need a health diary to be kept, if possible. From the moment you intend to instruct a lawyer, it makes sense to document your state of health continuously, because I can tell you, when you're sitting in court later you won't be able to piece it together any more. And if you have of course already won a determination notice, that is of course also very helpful for enforcing civil law claims. Of course, if you have diagnoses and reports from doctors and hospitals, please submit them, and at the same time submit to us the release from confidentiality for the treating doctors, because many medical liability boards want to see all medical documents from before and after the vaccinations right from the start, in order to form a picture of how likely it is that the vaccination caused damage. Yes, and of course the signed power of attorney. Then there is something else; perhaps Professor Haditsch will say something about it later,

4:54:08namely the area of immunological blood profiles. We have immunological blood profiles done because the explanation by Ms Katalin Karikó, former vice president of BioNTech, explained how damage to interferon communication in the body comes about. We therefore have the Th1, Th2 cytokine status and Th17 measured. We have a small immunological profile done, so to speak, with CD4+, CD8+, and there are other values on it. We have the natural killer cells tested in their status and function, and because of the thrombotic effects also take the D-dimers, and perhaps Professor Haditsch will have a few ideas for us later on what else we could test or have tested. For those on the university side who are interested in the evaluation: we now have over 400 such immunological findings from clients, almost all of which, except one, actually show a defect in interferon communication. It then gets interesting again later how interpretation by the courts proceeds.

4:55:34For that we need immunologists who can actually read and interpret the corresponding findings, also in connection with the diagnosed symptoms. Of the 650 out-of-court proceedings that are under way, about 120 lawsuits have been filed, mainly against BioNTech and Moderna for now, and yes, we assume that the bases for claims offer sufficient prospects of success and that perhaps one court or another will agree, because not all of them can be so politically aligned that BioNTech and Pfizer get what they want. I consider that out of the question. Thank you very much for your attention.

4:56:28Thank you, dear Tobias, for this interesting talk, which probably gives many vaccine-injured people hope that they can claim damages. I wish you every, every success with it. For the sake of completeness I would like to say that

4:56:49wants to offer. In the coming months and years we will probably need very, very many lawyers to represent the many injured here, but it is important that everyone here files their lawsuit, or their criminal complaint, or their civil suit, in order to get their damage compensated to some extent. I'll move on to the next speaker. It is Wilfried Schmitz, a lawyer from [unclear]; he will report on criminal complaints against the Paul Ehrlich Institute, the EMA and some German politicians, with which he has caused a stir. As I already mentioned today, he was the lead lawyer in the military complaint proceedings of two high-ranking Bundeswehr officers against the obligation to tolerate Covid-19 injections before the highest German administrative court, the

4:58:13Federal Administrative Court, who from that point on had to experience unprecedented interference with their fundamental rights, often, as you all know, with disastrous consequences for the life of the whole family and their economic livelihood. Anyone who wants to find out about my work as a lawyer, especially in recent years, may read the texts on my home page at anwalt-schmitz.eu. On the basis of numerous [proceedings] in several federal states, which I started as early as May and June 2020, it was already completely clear to me by June or July 2020 that my clients and I would ultimately find no [hearing] from the competent courts, in particular the higher administrative courts, which are responsible for judicial review of regulations. Statements by renowned scientists and studies were simply ignored by the judiciary throughout; proceedings were in some cases delayed for years, and effective legal protection was thus made a non-binding joke. For example, two judicial review proceedings that I brought in May and June 2020 before the Bavarian Administrative Court and the Higher Administrative Court in Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania have not been heard to this day; the proceedings have not to this day

4:59:43could challenge have long since been repealed; that means the matter has been resolved. So they evidently wanted to bring about resolution through delay, and that means effective legal protection has been completely suspended. Yes, like a common thread, the message running through all proceedings in 2020 was: what the RKI says is as if proclaimed by the Holy Spirit; it is the eternal, blissful truth, and everything else is practically irrelevant. With that, whatever was announced by authorities such as the RKI was used to justify all sorts of interference with people's rights, especially those of schoolchildren and senior citizens, with fatal consequences. Going into that in depth here, what white torture is and everything behind it, would go too far now and would also overlap with what previous speakers have already said, so I'll stay

5:00:54[the obligations it was meant to] fulfil had nothing to do with it any more. So people who criticised the Corona measures and took legal action against them were in fact denied access to justice. Fundamental rights were evidently no longer

5:01:24is willing to deal appropriately with the crimes and offences of recent years, or to deal with anything at all. So, one thing at a time: of particular public interest in the first half of 2022 was my case in Leipzig at the Federal Administrative Court, where I am the lawyer in charge. These proceedings were directed, and they are not yet concluded, I'll come back to that in a moment, against the Covid-19 duty of toleration for soldiers, which in effect corresponds to compulsory vaccination, in big quotation marks. And that is why I thank you, Ronny, for repeatedly pointing out the official, unbelievably brazen misinformation by the Bundeswehr, which is still available today, on the dangers of the modRNA injection. One cannot point out this scandal often enough. The arbitrariness of the First Military Service Senate of the Federal Administrative Court made these scandals, these conditions, possible in the first place. If the judges had dispensed justice on 7

5:02:29July 2022, this would no longer be possible now. For clarification: these military complaint proceedings are not yet [concluded]; a reasoned complaint about the violation of the right to be heard has been lodged. We will probably see in April or May 2023 how the Federal Administrative Court deals with these submissions on the complaint. All relevant information on the progress of the proceedings can be found on my home page or on the Telegram channel "No Covid vaccination for soldiers". Yes, and now to the topic for which you invited me: I received a great and consistently positive response to my criminal complaints against those responsible for the Covid-19 vaccination campaign, the EMA, the Paul Ehrlich Institute, the Bundeswehr leadership, the STIKO and especially against Federal Health Minister Lauterbach, who until June 2022 never tired of stressing, of claiming, that the Covid-19 injection was free of side effects. That was only one lie, but a very consequential one, one of many. And the facts are complex; I have tried to work through them step by step, and that was only possible in the short time because the groundwork had already been done in the military complaint proceedings at the Federal Administrative Court. Until early 2022 there were only very few legal texts at all in Germany on the whole Covid-19 issue, especially on the injections, and that changed fundamentally with these proceedings. A great deal was put in writing,

5:04:29very extensive submissions were made. Even before 7 July the submissions filled over 1,000 pages of written pleadings and several thousand pages of annexes, all immortalised in the files of the Federal Administrative Court. And that was a very important step: getting away from commenting and evaluating and simply starting to write down what is actually right and what is wrong here. The criminal offences

5:05:05reach very far. The charges I set out in my criminal complaints arise from the Therapeutic Products Advertising Act, the Medicinal Products Act and the Criminal Code, and they extend to the offence of murder, of which I see several variants fulfilled, in particular the variant of treachery. There are also further criminal offences to be examined here, namely those under the War Weapons Control Act and the Code of Crimes against International Law, and I have recommended that citizens please look at these offences more closely too. I may present more on this at some point. Anyone who thinks, and I'd like to make this clear too, that crimes under the Code of Crimes against International Law such as genocide or crimes against humanity are going too far may simply read sections 6 and 7 of that Code, or Articles 6 and 7 of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court. In my opinion the wording of these criminal provisions is self-explanatory even for legal laypeople, and if you then compare it with the facts you have become aware of in recent years, I believe the suspicion will quickly arise even for legal laypeople that several variants of these offences are fulfilled in each case.

5:06:23These complaints then spread on social media and were published by many websites, including your association, MWGFD, and of course these complaints currently serve to inform. And, as was to be expected, all the public prosecutors to whom I [submitted] these

5:06:47Darmstadt, responsible for the Paul Ehrlich Institute, and the Berlin public prosecutor's office, where the complaints against the Bundeswehr leadership and Health Minister Lauterbach were received, and a few days ago also the criminal complaint against the STIKO: all these public prosecutors refused to open investigations after just a few days, which [would require] a miracle of

5:07:17the annexes to the criminal complaints are so demanding and so extensive that even a highly motivated team of public prosecutors would need at least several weeks to grasp all relevant facts at least well enough to begin investigations, in particular further investigation of the facts and securing evidence. But

5:07:47nothing at all was done, no investigation at all; for whatever reason, probably political pressure, they didn't even open investigations. Yes, I [have] addressed it in these media, but also in the medical journals. A public prosecutor who has read that can

5:08:46in any case, pay; I didn't want to pay; I don't use the public broadcasting service and didn't want to pay for it either, for good reasons, because decades ago I really experienced how manipulative and sometimes malicious the propaganda run by these public broadcasters is, how war crimes are trivialised, how terrorists are trivialised, and then at some point that was simply it; it was clear to me that I can't just pay the licence fee; I must at least use the options the law provides. So I lodged objections, filed lawsuits, at some point took it public too, and then a great many people got in touch who, knowing that these lawsuits ultimately had no prospect of success, also wanted to refuse the licence fee, in court too, in order to make a statement, a statement of protest, no more, but no less either. And seen that way I was well prepared for this topic, and it seems important to me that lawyers, if they really want to achieve something, before criminal judges when defending doctors or before a Federal Administrative Court, also make an effort to convey, vividly convey, that what these judges may or probably have in their minds, what they have accepted as reality, is in truth far removed from reality. On this occasion I would like

5:10:26to note, because all contributions so far have been deadly serious, that there are also a few laudable exceptions. Only today, on a tip from Professor Ulrike Kämmerer, I discovered the Telegram channel "Dr. Biene's Verbal Vitriol" by Dr Sabine C. Stebel. On this Telegram channel, which is still very small, so probably still being built up, she has published a very informative and no less witty series of posts on Project Lightspeed, written by Joe Miller with, or with the involvement of, BioNTech SE, Özlem Türeci and Ugur Sahin. Anyone who reads it can really laugh heartily at the incompetence and presumption of a Ugur Sahin. I was highly amused, although it is in itself a very serious matter, but when I read it I immediately had to think of Kubrick's film "Dr. Strangelove or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb", who some decades ago, in the 1960s, had also set out to make a documentary about the nuclear arms race and then very quickly realised that the subject was so insane, so crazy, so off the wall that it could really only be told as a comedy. Humour is really very good in these times too for maintaining your health;

5:12:11can, well, you quickly notice that legal knowledge alone is not enough. National and international criminal law can help assess facts legally, but that falls short if you want to understand the historical developments that made current events possible in the first place. You have to take a broader view. Is it enough to know German history to be able to classify these events in Germany, for example knowing the reasons that led to the fall of the administration of justice in the Third Reich, as dealt with in books such as "Hitler's Justice" by Ingo Müller or "The Dual State" by Ernst Fraenkel? Are comparisons of the current conditions with fascism meaningful? Strictly speaking, no, if only because, at least according to the Brockhaus encyclopedia, fascism was fundamentally anti-communist. But the WEF's agenda is not anti-communist; rather, this agenda is a genuine communist agenda. If a few years ago the WEF's home page said: "You'll own nothing and, brainwashed and dumbed down, you'll be happy anyway", then it is actually clear that this agenda cannot be a capitalist agenda,

5:13:44but for the super-rich, that is the agenda: communism, so to speak, for the human family and total prosperity and wealth for the elite; that is the concept. So knowledge of German history is not enough, especially since the so-called anti-Corona policies and this whole agenda on Corona gene therapeutics, commonly referred to as vaccination, were rolled out from 2020 across almost all countries on earth. If we

5:14:25want to put it in the right context, you have to look at the history of the 20th century, in my opinion also the history of the second half of the 19th century, the history of medicine, especially in the 20th century, the influence of powerful foundations such as the Rockefeller Foundation on all areas of medical education and care, and ultimately even the entire history of the Anglo-American elites from the beginning of colonialism to predatory capitalism, which is currently called privatisation, for example. Only if you grasp this whole context can you understand how things could go so far, how they have become increasingly acute over the last three years. There are good books on all these topics; I definitely don't want to advertise books here, but Naomi Klein's book "The Shock Doctrine" is really well worth reading, because it shows very well the connection between Anglo-American predatory capitalism, keyword Chicago School, and the methods of white torture that emerged from the MK-Ultra torture programmes. That gives a very good understanding, and as we all know there is this Interior Ministry strategy paper on how we get Covid-19 under control, which can hardly be surpassed in perversity, and this strategy paper alone proves that methods of white torture

5:16:00have meanwhile officially become part of the repertoire of politics; that is simply [a fact]. Historical context alone is not enough to be able to assess the downright apocalyptic events of recent years appropriately. These events were truly so incomprehensible, also so cruel in their effects, that they have probably thoroughly shaken the foundations of everyone with empathy, that is,

5:16:38concerning their faith, regardless of whether this faith is a religious faith or not, and that is also the reason why, because as a human being I am affected myself, I have repeatedly allowed myself personal remarks on how I as a lawyer have survived the permanent confrontation with the legal nihilism of recent years. Perhaps that can help some people out there. So why, for three years, the effort to inform and the ever-new fight against the windmills of the judiciary? Quite simply, and I think that is what motivates everyone: we would all make ourselves complicit if we remained silent despite our knowledge and our insights into recent years. It is a matter of course to speak the truth and defend it. It would become pitch dark on earth if all life were covered by the darkness of lies, in view of the unbelievably brazen lies with which people have been deprived of their rights, humiliated and also tormented and deceived in recent years, especially

5:17:50where it says: "Hell is empty and all the devils are here." Dear Wilfried, I don't want to interrupt briefly, I don't want to interrupt, but time is getting on. In view of the advanced time and the speakers still to come, we must please [wrap up] here. I've lost track of time. Yes, I would just like to say: there are so many who practically, and we have a fixed time slot. Thank you very much. Okay, no problem.

5:18:24Then I'll stop now. Thank you for your talk, and I found your criminal complaints against the vaccination protagonists, including the responsible politicians Lauterbach and the defence minister, very courageous. But it is a German dilemma that all these criminal offences count for nothing here, that public prosecutors are bound by instructions and subordinate to the Ministry of Justice. Switzerland of course has an advantage there. And the question we ask ourselves is whether we really have to bury our hope in the German judiciary. But now, I wish all lawyers a good evening. Now

5:19:10it is about helping people who have been harmed by the vaccination in medical and therapeutic terms, and I would like to briefly introduce our first speaker. Since June 2021 she has been, so to speak, the good soul of our reporting office for vaccine deaths, and she has offered or been able to provide help to many relatives of people who died in connection with the vaccination, for example in organising autopsies. Roswitha Eder, our speaker, is a trained alternative practitioner, also a bereavement and end-of-life companion; she is the mother of two growing daughters and works almost around the clock for the association on the hotlines, for the vaccine injury reporting office

5:19:54and also for the therapist referral service, often together with her colleague Claudia and our many other telephone operators, whom I would also like to thank very warmly. Many of them do their service for a few hours pro bono, and I would like to say that all these services provided by MWGFD are available free of charge to those seeking help. And Roswitha Eder will now tell us more about this MWGFD service. She really always has an open ear for all worries and needs. We get a great deal of positive feedback about this hotline; people are grateful that they can use something like this. I remember that Roswitha Eder once even very

5:20:51Today, as part of this symposium, I may give you a small insight into the work on our hotlines. Just very briefly about myself: Ronny has just introduced me wonderfully. For 20 years I worked in a joint practice with a Russian colleague, my focus being the treatment of burnout patients and resilience training. An additional qualification, as Ronny mentioned, as an end-of-life and bereavement companion: you might think that would prepare you as well as possible for work on our hotlines. But far from it. The extent of the catastrophe that followed the ill-fated vaccination campaign left even me speechless. But let me start from the beginning. As Ronny said, our reporting office for suspected vaccine deaths was set up at the end of June 2021. My colleague Claudia and I have looked after it from the very first hour. For me it was a voluntary leap into unknown waters back then, since until then, just like all my callers, I had not had the topic of autopsy on my radar at all.

5:22:09Our task is to support the relatives of the deceased with advice and practical help from the day of death. Some also call us beforehand, during their relative's dying process, so that in the end they are not overwhelmed by events. Because who, in their darkest hours, has a clear head for the procedure that an autopsy entails, with all the obstacles often put up by the authorities, and a subsequent second examination by Professor Burkhardt? So it is only advisable, if at all possible, that is, if death does not occur suddenly and unexpectedly, as it so often does, to deal in advance with the so-called last things of life, provided one is interested at all in clarifying the cause of death, which is often a very big problem, since callers mostly stand utterly alone in their efforts to get clarity. Families are usually divided: the unvaccinated person calls us, and the vaccinated family members then put up resistance at the very last moment. But since we only have a narrow time window for the autopsy, there are repeatedly protracted consultations in the

5:23:45family members get in touch with us who ultimately are not legally entitled to arrange an autopsy, since that is reserved for the closest relatives. What worries us more and more recently is the further declining willingness of pathologists in Germany to carry out an autopsy as soon as relatives so much as mention the word vaccination or the laboratory in Reutlingen. Dr Mörz in Dresden is still a laudable exception. As more and more vaccine-injured people called us over the months, wanting at least to report their health problems, it became increasingly frustrating for us telephone operators not to be able to give them any support or help at all. In the end it was already noticeably helpful for many when we listened to them without prejudice and encouraged them, but that alone couldn't be it, we thought. So, practically out of necessity, a second hotline was finally launched at the end of November last year. We thought, we thought, we thought six telephone operators would be well prepared.

5:25:36Nevertheless, [what we could offer] ranges from rescue in the form of advice, research, battles with ponderous authorities and so on. So we were now dealing primarily with deeply desperate people, with their helpless families at their side, who didn't know what was happening to them. Behind every single case there is a human tragedy. We have [the following topics]

5:26:45a stark example: it is as if the whole body is on fire. Stigmatisation as mentally ill or hypochondriacs, to quote just a few frequently heard sentences: "Don't make such a fuss", "Don't get so worked up about it", "You read too much": these are the statements of those around them.

5:27:09Exclusion from one's own family is not at all rare, the family that should actually be taking care of their seriously ill adult children, who had to break off their studies or apprenticeship and slipped into unemployment as a result. Even their own family disowns their children; for a mother that is the last thing you can understand. The last savings have been spent on all sorts of therapies; people are broke. Some had to give up the business they had painstakingly built up over the years because they are unable to work and have now become recipients of basic welfare benefits. What also keeps coming up is the phenomenon of shedding: unvaccinated people who have not had Corona show more or less severe signs of illness, up to malignant tumours, after loose contact with vaccinated people, explicitly without any exchange of bodily fluids.

5:28:13Biopsies that could be re-examined in Reutlingen have so far been refused by doctors. Of course there are also problems with donor blood, and I myself have already had enquiries from transplant recipients about donated organs from unvaccinated people. This list could go on. All I can say is: after almost two years of service with MWGFD, it is simply horrifying and deeply shameful how our society in general and the medical profession, along with psychiatrists and psychotherapists who even talk the affected people into believing that they are mentally ill and not physically ill, I hear that in every second conversation, that the affected are only imagining it, how they in particular treat the vaccine-injured is horrifying. In my entire practice, and through my Russian colleague I often dealt with expellees and politically persecuted people from the post-Soviet countries with all their traumas, I have never experienced so much despair and hopelessness among those affected.

5:29:29The smaller proportion of vaccine-injured people who contact us and who have meanwhile informed themselves well are downright terrified of dying. Understandably, they ask themselves: what is going on in my body? What else is in store for me? But I must also mention that I have never experienced so much gratitude, just because the callers felt taken seriously and we listened to them without prejudice. It is deeply touching, but also shameful at the same time, because really all this should be a matter of course.

5:30:13They are very often family members or friends of those affected; those affected themselves make up about half. How do we try to help? First of all, of course, by listening. The question we hear so often keeps coming to mind, and

5:30:43which brings us to the second point: taking those affected seriously. Third: giving encouragement and hope, but of course no promise of a cure, since that is not possible at the current state of knowledge. Fourth: referring them to a suitable therapist, and fifth, as the previous speaker just mentioned, humour. I always call it gallows humour; it has helped me get through this time on the hotline well. I'm hugely pleased every time I manage to make the caller laugh at the end of our conversation. I usually succeed when I explain my name, Eder: they should remember Meister Eder. And

5:31:41then I'm pleased, because I think: well, yes, without humour we wouldn't be able to bear all this. And one more thing: I have a very special concern, and that is that I have more or less come to the conclusion that it is so important to close the rift that has arisen in our society, especially between the unvaccinated and those who are now vaccine-injured. Almost all of the injured complain bitterly about the shabby treatment by their fellow human beings. So I now use this opportunity to point out how we unvaccinated people were treated and are still being treated, and how important it is therefore now that we help each other and close the rift again. Finally, my appeal to those affected: join a regional self-help group; you can find the contact details on our home page.

5:32:46But I must warn you: don't take on the symptoms of the other affected people or make these symptoms your own, which would be understandable, but each case has to be seen individually. I keep getting reports from self-help groups where, understandably, people let themselves be influenced too much by the others. Nevertheless, the exchange between affected people is very valuable, and then please call the therapist referral hotline so that we can refer you to suitable therapists. At the end of my explanation I must seize this opportunity and, on behalf of many, thank Professor Sucharit Bhakdi and Professor Arne Burkhardt in the name of hundreds of callers with whom I have spoken in almost two years of work at MWGFD and who asked me to thank these two from the bottom of their hearts for their commitment and their fight for the truth. You cannot imagine how many people's lives and physical and mental health they have saved through their selfless commitment to the community. I am often, too often, asked to pass this on to them. Now I have done it. Thank you very much.

5:34:16Thank you, thank you, dear Roswitha, for these personal accounts, with which you took us into the everyday life of the telephone counsellors, the telephone operators. You are doing wonderful work that is really very, very valuable to us and provides a very good, important service to many fellow human beings. Thank you very much on behalf of all our MWGFD members. I would like to take this opportunity to point out, and I ask the control room to show picture 22, that we are still looking for therapists for this therapist referral hotline. So please, all medical practitioners, alternative practitioners, doctors and other therapists, feel addressed and get involved. You can register on our website and will then be referred to patients seeking help.

5:35:12We would of course be particularly pleased if many statutory health insurance doctors with an insurance licence took part, because many people seeking help are on long-term sick leave due to the long incapacity for work they have suffered because of Corona damage or Covid vaccine injuries and have almost no money left, and where certain services can be billed through the health insurers, please contact us. On our website you will find how you can log in, and we also offer a forum there, which opens tomorrow, where therapists can exchange ideas so that we can as quickly as possible [find] the suitable

5:36:16treatment options, without [clarifying] whether the laboratory parameters are useful in clarifying the question of vaccine injuries. Thank you, and thank you, dear Martin, for your talk. Yes, thank you very much, Ronny. Could you please hand the presentation over to me?

5:37:04The question of diagnostics is of course likewise a challenge with possible vaccine injuries. [unclear] in order to be able to make a better diagnosis of vaccine injuries, and as far as I am aware I have no conflict of interest, that is, no conflict of interest. Next slide, please. The challenge we have is that many signs of illness in people who may have been harmed by Corona or are dealing with post-vax syndrome are uncharacteristic, and we also keep finding these symptoms outside the whole Corona topic.

5:38:03The accumulations and age distributions are of course statistically striking, but say little about the individual case, or at least don't prove anything. And of course we see that these injuries vary greatly in terms of timing, intensity, duration and of course the organs affected in each case. Next slide, please. I think we have to distinguish between cases of illness that occur decoupled from the Corona topic, and here I am very, very grateful to Professor Schubert for also going into post-Covid, so to speak. At that point it is actually already decoupled from the actual Corona topic, but of course it is something that must not be neglected, so to speak, and I am very, very grateful to him for giving this topic such an important place here today. And on the other hand, of course, the cases of illness that are directly connected with Corona. Next slide, please. That means the important thing is first to be able to distinguish these two aspects from each other, and when it comes to the connection with Corona, you see there are different points: due to infection with SARS-CoV-2 or as collateral damage of the Corona measures, and you see that would then be due to lack of care, due to non-pharmaceutical interventions or due to medical

5:39:27interventions. And next slide, please, on why we primarily want to deal with this here now: in laboratory diagnostics it is the differentiation, because these are the questions we will probably have to answer very often in future or should work towards, between those things that resulted from infection with SARS-CoV-2, in particular the chronic form, what we call long Covid; please also distinguish this from post-Covid, long Covid; and on the other hand the collateral damage of Corona measures, of which there is of course a whole range. And I hope that my dear friend Christian Schubert will also note with approval that I have included psychological interventions among the non-pharmaceutical interventions here.

5:40:18But what we are trying to find on the laboratory side are of course the injuries here, collateral damage from the spike substances, that is, post-vax syndrome. Next slide, please. On this we also received an interim report dated 28 February 2021. It was originally a confidential report, a confidential report from Pfizer, so to speak. Next slide, please. And it ultimately stated that side effects occurring within three months had already been described, in small print over eight and a half pages. And that was known not only to Pfizer; it was known to the FDA and to the EMA. And it was not without reason that Pfizer wanted three generations to pass before disclosing the data.

5:41:09So after 75 years, but thanks to the Freedom of Information Act, which by the way was already cited today, by Dr Fiala, data have now come out, so to speak. With the next page. What we should capture, and I'm now trying to lead towards the question of meaningful laboratory diagnostics, is that women are affected more often than men, and that we must think both of new diseases and of the recurrence of known diseases. And if we look at what was shown in these 2,400 peer-reviewed papers, that is, what actually corresponds to the highest scientific standard, we simply have to acknowledge that, in principle, all organ systems can be affected by side effects of spike substances. And that also fits very well with what Professor Burkhardt showed today, for example, namely that they are often simply injuries that act via the endothelium, and we basically have blood flowing through the whole body; all our vessels are lined with endothelium, and so damage can actually occur anywhere, so to speak.

5:42:21That means, if we now express a wish, the examination profile should of course be tailored to, next slide please, the question of the organs affected. I don't want to, can't and shouldn't go into the individual diseases now. So please just flick through the next slides: cardiovascular, or vessels, or the immune system. Next, please, the questions in gynaecology; obstetrics was already shown today. Next slide please, the nervous system, in the broader sense, where the eye and ear are covered too, so to speak. Next slide, please. The skin, and now that should be the last slide in this context, and also general inflammations and diseases.

5:43:13And you see, we should capture all these things with a grid designed so that at least something gets caught in it when we now define which laboratory tests we should do. Next slide, please. Here we must of course also take into account that we have new diseases here, such as the excessive immune reaction. We already heard about antibody-dependent enhancement today; about vaccine-induced clot formation, not with a simultaneous tendency to bleed, that is, vaccine-induced thrombotic thrombocytopenia; vaccine-induced immune deficiency, V-AIDS; and sudden adult death, sudden adult death syndrome, where the diagnosis can actually only be made post mortem.

5:43:56Which is of course tragic on the one hand, but well-known pathologists or forensic doctors have said: we learn from the dead for the living, and in that respect these can also be very, very valuable findings. Next slide, please. The question I naturally ask myself is: are these trivialities, is this amateurish, are we just counting small change here, so to speak, or are these relevant magnitudes? And that's why I've brought you a few lines as examples: the sudden deaths of athletes, which have risen sharply, as was already shown to you today, the question with the ICD code: from 2016 to 2020 nine cases and then in 2021 alone more than 500 cases. And one of the generally known diseases, which is why I've included it here, is myocarditis, and so that you can see how relevant it is: the studies from Basel found a frequency of 2.8 per cent, or Thailand with 2.3 per cent. So if we estimate very conservatively, we can assume that if 50 per cent of Germans really were spiked, that would be 40 million, and with a 2 per cent probability that gives an incidence of 800,000 people in Germany for myocarditis alone, who would then have to be examined accordingly.

5:45:26Next slide, please. And if you then go abroad, you see that the National Health Service in the UK estimates more than 400,000 deaths from spiking, just by the way, and about 2,000 were saved. That means that for every person saved by this spike measure, 200 had to die on average. Overall mortality, which is considerably higher among the spiked than among the unspiked, or, in particular from a gynaecologist in the United States, Dr Thorp, you see how sharply stillbirths have risen, the abortion rate, stillbirths, global excess mortality: these are all figures that go beyond anything seen before. And ultimately a meaningful laboratory examination, an examination panel, should also help prevent these sometimes dramatic consequences by perhaps recognising the danger early and perhaps also being able to counteract it. Next slide, please.

5:46:29So what we should or want to define here is which laboratory parameters should go into this panel so that we can recognise these problems early and at least mitigate the consequences. Of course it would be ideal if we could prevent them altogether. Next slide, please. That means that, resulting from this spectrum, we now of course have certain requirements for laboratory diagnostics. Of course the primary aim is to see whether it is connected with Corona at all. But once that is established, the secondary aim is of course to try to distinguish long Covid, that is, the condition after having had the disease, from post-vax, that is, the damage caused by spiking. And of course one has to say again that we often cannot tell by natural means, whether it is long Covid or post-vax, whether the therapy is working as desired or not.

5:47:34That means it would of course also be ideal to have laboratory parameters with which we can carry out monitoring in the event of treatment. We have just heard from the lawyers, whom I greatly appreciate, who now play, and will increasingly play, an incredibly important role in dealing with what may still be coming our way. And that is why it is repeatedly expressed as a wish, and should be a goal, to create a data situation here with which, if necessary, one can provide good evidence in court proceedings, so to speak, as robust facts. Next slide, please. The requirements continue: with the laboratory tests we should try, on the one hand, to be able to make a reliable attribution, also identifying any organ involvement, and possibly also help substantiate specific questions.

5:48:35These can arise again and again, for example in court proceedings or with complicated courses, and of course also to give guidance on the direction in which a therapy might be aimed. Next slide, please.

5:48:54So what are the challenges for laboratory diagnostics now? What are the requirements? What are the core parameters? The examination profile as a whole, it's not about one parameter, it's about the examination profile, should be sufficiently sensitive, that is, we need sufficient sensitivity, but at the same time sufficiently precise so that [no] false conclusions are drawn, that is, sufficient specificity. In my view it should be simple and possible to carry out in large numbers, so that we have a methodology that can be applied across Germany, or perhaps internationally, where the results are available promptly and where the whole thing can be offered inexpensively. I would like to say in this context that I have the greatest respect for those colleagues, and I'm lucky enough to know Professor Kämmerer personally, whom I esteem above all and who does brilliant testing.

5:49:56That cannot be emphasised enough. But what I mean is: one thing is university-level examination, partly also research, and the other is something that can practically be done in every, at least every certified laboratory in Germany, close to the patient and promptly. And I believe that's primarily what this is about now. That means it should be suitable for everyday routine. And the old saying applies: as many test parameters as necessary and as few as possible. Because we have to see how we'll somehow manage with the health budget in the coming years anyway. Next slide, please. I mean, what I'm proposing here is not the Bible. I'll say that at the end too.

5:50:44I believe we need a consortium here that decides what makes sense. And especially considering that a good part of the audience probably consists of lay people, so to speak, I don't want to go into the details now. I just think we need a basic scheme, parameters that should be mandatory. These are mostly basic parameters, such as the organ functions of liver, kidney, thyroid, adrenal gland, these things, inflammation parameters, clarification of a possible Covid- or post-spike-associated diabetes, checking whether the heart is damaged, whether certain viruses that are latent in the body, such as those of the herpes virus group listed here, have perhaps been reactivated.

5:51:34Is there a vitamin deficiency or something like that? Next slide, please. There are of course special situations, for example with an allergic disposition or an allergic reaction after being spiked. People who then had an allergic shock or something similar, where certain parameters in addition to the mandatory profile make perfect sense in that situation, are listed here. Or, for example, people who then got a thrombosis, a blood clot, or a pulmonary embolism, that is, when the clot has broken loose and then blocked pulmonary vessels, where certain additional tests are done to determine, for example, whether there is a natural tendency to thrombosis or whether this would be a special situation.

5:52:20Next slide, please. What must also be said in addition is that there are of course examinations that are not available everywhere or cannot always be done. I esteem Prof. Burkhardt above all; he wouldn't have had to put himself through all this, and he has kindly contributed his expertise, his capacity for work, his time and his energy, I'd say, to help work through this whole topic. The possibilities that have arisen from his examinations are probably of historic significance. But the possibility of a biopsy doesn't exist everywhere. Where it is possible, through what he has shown, through the tissue sections, we of course have the possibility of saying: if both spike and nucleocapsid are negative, then it has nothing to do with Corona.

5:53:16And if both are positive, it is usually the result of an infection. And if only spike is positive but nucleocapsid is negative, then it is the result of spiking. And the same association would also apply to antigen detection from the blood, which would have great advantages, because no biopsy is needed, because in some situations, so to speak, it is the only way to do it on a living person. And the only inexpensive method available in large numbers, so to speak, is the so-called ELISA test. It would of course be desirable if one could even differentiate a bit with it. The decision tree is the same, if you like, as with the biopsy.

5:53:59But we have a problem. At present, and to my knowledge worldwide, there is no antigen test from the blood that is approved for routine testing. They are all only approved for research use only, that is, only for research purposes. And one has to say one thing here, just so that lay people can perhaps imagine it: this is about detection in the dimension of femtograms in the blood. You may know what a gram is; a thousandth of it is a milligram, then comes a microgram, then a nanogram, then a picogram, and then a femtogram. And that is a very, very small amount. And you can easily imagine that, if this test method is introduced, one must of course make sure it is of such high quality that we don't measure random parameters, that we don't flounder around in the grey zone and then have to cobble together a questionable finding from a questionable test result; it has to be watertight.

5:55:09Next slide, please. That means what we also have here are parameters that are actually open, where we really need to discuss them, and which keep appearing in the literature. As a guideline I took, among other things, what the Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance in the United States recommends as a basic programme. Where I have an asterisk: of course, in connection with clarifying inflammation, with autoimmune antibodies and so on, with coagulation parameters, one can do many others. But if they have no clinical relevance, they really only result in costs. And that's why I would initially exclude these parameters from the routine examination profile.

5:55:59Next slide, please. I'm coming to the end anyway. Despite all the drama in the situation, I always try to develop some kind of positive perspective. That's why the last slide is titled problems and possible solutions. We have the problem that there is currently no official test profile. And that is why my appeal to Ronny, to Sucharit too, to the people who decisively determine MWGFD's path, is to put together an interdisciplinary group of experts to compile and define this profile, to construct it as a guideline, so to speak. And as I said, as described here too, it must be interdisciplinary.

5:56:48It shouldn't just be laboratory physicians, or microbiologists like me, or something like that. Rather, it would be important to involve these people on the basis of the organ systems I described and to clarify what is really essential to help them in differential diagnosis. And the other thing is that we currently have no established test for antigen in the blood. That is the problem. And the possible solution is that we simply try to validate products currently on the market for research use only, at least in-house, and find out which test system is sufficiently sensitive and specific here so that we can rely on the result.

5:57:28That's it from my side. Thank you very much. Thank you very much, dear Martin, for this great, excellent talk. Thank you for addressing the important things. And yes, we will try to act on the impulse you have given. And of course we want you in this group too. It would be nice if you could help us a little with coordination. But it really is important that we find the best of what is sensible and necessary. Thank you. I'll hand over to our next speaker. Now, for the first time, it is about the treatment options we have for vaccine injuries. And as a representative of the doctors' groups we have invited Dr Walter Weber, our colleague from Hamburg, co-founder of Doctors for Education, an activist from the very first hour.

5:58:21And today he will tell us what options there are to help the vaccine-injured therapeutically, simply and affordably. Dear Walter, I look forward to your talk. Yes, okay, let me quickly look at the clock to keep to my time. This talk, this contribution of course refers to the so-called vaccine injuries from so-called Covid-19 vaccinations. As we all know, this is not a classic vaccination but mRNA-based gene injections. Professor Haditsch, the previous speaker, speaks of spiking. The spike proteins do not remain at the injection site as promised at the beginning but are detectable in all organs, as Professor Burkhardt was able to establish in his autopsies.

5:59:19And it is not only the spike proteins that are detectable in all organs, but also the lipid nanoparticles. The spike proteins dock onto the ACE receptors of the blood vessels, can cause bleeding, thromboses and so on, and frequently cause a rise in blood pressure, hypertensive crises. Since the spike proteins can go into all organs, a diffuse, very varied and thus confusing symptom picture often arises. We don't yet know these symptom pictures and first have to get used to them. And we also have to get used to assuming a vaccine injury. Precise proof is possible via antibody constellations, up to detection of the exact vaccine, but that is then very elaborate and also very expensive.

6:00:28Somewhat less elaborate is establishing whether it is a vaccination or a post-infection condition, that is, a condition after vaccination or infection. But only someone who really understands it and knows their way around differential diagnosis should do the various antibodies. And sometimes I see the craziest examinations, which surely cost hundreds and thousands of euros. And I ask myself: who then understands them? Another aspect of symptom formation is the neurotoxicity of the spike proteins, which can lead to paraesthesia, numbness, feelings of oppression and fear of death. And this confusion in the whole symptomatology leads to pictures that doctors cannot interpret, and they then push patients into the psycho corner. When a doctor doesn't understand what is going on, he often has three things.

6:01:43He says: there's nothing wrong with you, or you're only imagining it, or go and see a psychiatrist. Today I had contact with a patient who, with what is obviously a vaccine injury to us, ended up in a closed ward. As we all know, a German judge has to come within 24 hours. And this German judge then said: you will stay four weeks in the closed ward. And yes, those are the fates here. One of the previous speakers already talked about all these fates. It is terrible to have to listen to it. The situation becomes completely confusing because of the possible effects of nanolipid particles, possibly in connection with 5G.

6:02:43We heard something about that from our Swiss friend, what may possibly be coming our way. When side-effect symptoms appear, in my view there are not very many blood values that take you further. The D-dimers can be elevated and indicate the need to influence the blood coagulation values, often with aspirin. In any case, with neurological, cardiac or coagulation problems, immediate clarification by a specialist is important, because there is danger to life here. And the fact that this is not taken seriously is shown by the many frequent deaths, some of which could have been remedied if it had been handled properly. In therapy it is very important to me to proceed as simply as possible, as inexpensively as possible and also as time-efficiently as possible. I don't have time to talk to every patient for one or two hours, which would be necessary. But he does need help.

6:04:02And the basic instruction is that the patient should ensure rest, stress reduction, and enough vitamin D, C and zinc. As a medicinal measure, the following has proved effective for me: Ambroxol 75 retard capsules, which act very specifically against spike proteins. It prevents docking onto ACE receptors and, in a kind of competitive inhibition, drives the spike proteins off the receptors again. This effect is little known among doctors and also little known among pharmacists. We know Ambroxol or Mucosolvan as a good old bronchitis remedy. And not infrequently I send a patient with a prescription to the pharmacist, and the pharmacist says: oh, what nonsense, that's only for bronchitis. And then it takes another day or two until that's corrected. So Ambroxol, and the literature can be requested from me, I have some literature on it, is very effective precisely in rendering the spike proteins harmless again.

6:05:34In addition I give ACC effervescent tablets, 600. ACC is a precursor of the strongest antioxidant we have, namely glutathione. I also give rock rose (cistus) from Dr Pandalis. It has a similar effect on the spike proteins to Ambroxol. And I like to give pine needle tea with the substance suramin. All of this is available without prescription, relatively free of side effects or low in side effects, and costs around 30 euros, so it is available to everyone, or almost, yes, I think to everyone. I give this to people and say: please get back to me after a week. About 70 per cent have effects from it, positive effects. With the others I have to decide personally. And then I take more time to see which direction it is going.

6:06:35Here you can offer high-dose vitamin C, and I mean from 30 grams upwards, which is little known and also often rejected. I refer to the company, I'll say the name, Pascoe, which is the only one producing high-dose vitamin C, 7.5 grams. And they know which doctors or alternative practitioners give vitamin C in this dosage, because it isn't very common.

6:07:15Another treatment, and already in the high-price range, is immunoapheresis, through which interfering antibodies can be removed, so to speak, which leads to rapid relief of symptoms. However, you quickly get into costs of several thousand euros here, without knowing whether the health insurance will cover it. The use of chlorine dioxide, which some call for, is problematic in Germany because it is not approved for use in humans. As a doctor I would be entering a not exactly harmless grey zone here. And since I have had two visits from the gentlemen in the dark myself, two house searches, I have no desire for anything more of that sort. The simplest treatment option I have heard of so far, and about which I have only been marginally informed so far, is four weeks of fasting and the daily intake of broccoli sprouts.

6:08:31The colleague, a practitioner named Marco Wrobetz, says that he has so far eliminated all vaccine side effects with it. I can't say anything about it personally, but I wanted to report it at this point. A very good compilation of diagnostics, prophylaxis and therapy, listed encyclopaedically, so to speak, can be found from Florian Schilling in the PDF "Post-Vakzin-Syndrom", post-vaccine with a K, post-vaccine syndrome. There you'll find practically everything listed, including much of what Professor Haditsch has just reported. So there you can inform yourself encyclopaedically, so to speak, about everything that is possible. I myself have decided on this simple route, because it allows me to help many people inexpensively.

6:09:41So, dear Ronny, eleven minutes are up now and I am at the end of my talk. Yes, warm thanks, dear Walter, you did that brilliantly at such a late hour. I thank you above all for your statement against unnecessary, expensive laboratory tests and your suggestion of Ambroxol and ACC as concrete, inexpensive measures, together with a few herbal things. I have also experienced in my practice that the herbal things, often inexpensive ones, prove very effective. So thank you for this excellent presentation, and I believe that with it a great, great many patients can already be helped. And we will now get further tips from Christina Wolf. She is an alternative practitioner and will shed light on the whole thing again specifically from a naturopathic and holistic point of view.

6:10:29She has been an alternative practitioner for over 30 years, focusing on the immune system, autoimmune diseases and psychosomatic illnesses. And I now look forward to your talk, dear Christina. Yes, dear Ronny, thank you very much, and thank you very much for the invitation. I'll get started right away. And first of all, especially as an alternative practitioner, I would like to make clear: a vaccination of course cannot be eliminated and cannot be undone. The vaccination has happened. At most I can try to get individual substances out again. My general statements, from what I find in practice, are: most vaccinated people constantly have infections and inflammations. They are more severe and more persistent than before the vaccination.

6:11:22The vaccinations worsen existing illnesses, and the vaccinations always take effect at the weak point. So the illnesses are generally more difficult to treat. It takes longer for patients to recover. And I also find that homeopathic remedies no longer work as well, because the immune system has of course been damaged by the vaccination. That means more herbal remedies are needed than usual. And thank you, the first slide is already there. What makes things more difficult in general is a poor general condition. That means, as always, one of course takes into account the patient's weight, their nutritional state and what pre-existing illnesses there are. And from a naturopathic point of view, one often first has to detoxify and also de-acidify, so that the immune system and self-healing powers can work properly again at all. Existing allergies and autoimmune diseases also make things more difficult. If these illnesses were already present before, it is very likely that the patient will react to the vaccination in the same way.

6:12:41Deficiencies must also be eliminated absolutely. I'll come back to that later. And what really makes therapy difficult too are pre-existing states of exhaustion. So there I first have to take care of the adrenal glands and the mitochondria. Yes, the exciting question is of course always: what batch was it? Was it a normal batch, let's say, or a particularly toxic batch? Exactly. And what is also relevant for me is whether other infections are present, or whether long Covid or post-Covid, whatever you call it, is still present, because it all gets mixed up. The vaccinated, vaccinated two or three times, have already had one, two or three Corona infections.

6:13:44So that makes for quite a muddle too. And I must also agree very much with Professor Schubert that psychological factors certainly play a role too. And that's why I use dosages as high as possible. Yes, next slide, please. Exactly, very briefly on deficiencies. The most important vitamins and minerals the immune system needs must be absolutely covered so that the immune system and self-healing powers can work properly at all. No. Otherwise it's as if, let's say, a site manager on a building site says to his workers: please start building the house now. And the workers then say: sorry, we have no bricks.

6:14:42So from that point of view, it's really the basis. Yes, then, exactly, next slide please. Yes, which remedies are needed? We know of course that the damage is essentially caused by the mRNA technology and the spikes. And the damage is of course varied. It is mechanical, inflammatory, toxic, allergic and autoimmune. And of course I say contamination also plays a big role, intended and unintended. Exactly, that's why I need different categories of remedies. And what I start with naturally depends on what is in the foreground. That means first of all I need these remedies for the immune system. Then I need the remedies against the inflammation.

6:15:44Then I need many organ-related remedies. And what is very, very important in my view: I need overarching remedies that let the cell regenerate, that restore normal cell metabolism and that help the cell throw out all the rubbish. I have also had good experience with vaccine nosodes, but in high potency, namely C200; the lower potencies, for example a C30, don't really do anything. I sometimes give them in addition. And what would actually also be important, I'd say, is that patients have a healthy gut flora. That is of course very difficult, because you can't achieve it quickly. But we know that a lot of immune cells are formed in the gut and then migrate into the blood. Yes, then next slide, please.

6:16:49Exactly, on inflammation and the immune system I would like to say the following, namely that the immune system often reacts to the vaccinations with inflammation. And the most important anti-inflammatory remedies are turmeric, ginger, frankincense, omega-3 and CBD oil. Then I like to relieve the immune system, simply because the immune system can't work on so many building sites at the same time. That means I like to add germicidal remedies that simply take work off the immune system. And exactly, there is for example grapefruit seed extract, there are nasturtium-horseradish preparations, there is broccoli, and there are lots of herbal mixtures that are really very good.

6:17:51Yes, exactly, now sometimes you think: the therapy should really be working, so why isn't it? And the thing is that the immune system, which is really heavily challenged and really exerting itself, keeps working and working and working; it doesn't switch off, and then the complaints remain. The process is similar to chronic pain syndrome, where a pain arc sometimes forms even though the cause is actually already gone. That means in this case I give killed bacteria, but they have to be injected; orally it doesn't work. Then I give Vincetoxicum, a plant that puts the Th1/Th2 shift back in order; CBD oil too, it regulates.

6:19:00And then there are lots of homeopathic complex remedies that regulate the immune system back down. In this case it is a functional process and leaves no damage. So this immune system that has ramped up and won't ramp down seems to cause complaints that aren't really there any more. And I use exactly this therapy for the many autoimmune diseases that now exist after the vaccination too. However, there structural damage does of course occur. And then this whole therapy I do takes longer and is also much more stubborn. Yes, the slides can go now.

6:20:08Yes, thank you very much. Exactly. And then, when I notice that the toxic processes are in the foreground, they are usually neurotoxic, cytotoxic and haemotoxic. And from the beginning I actually thought of snake venoms, because snake venoms cause exactly this damage. And from a therapeutic point of view there are remedies, homeopathic remedies and also anthroposophic remedies, that work precisely at this point. There are also enzyme preparations, but I don't have much experience with them. And I inject these preparations in very high doses and then have patients continue taking them orally at home. Exactly. And otherwise I inject a lot of these remedies that simply let the cell regenerate and help the cell restore its normal function.

6:21:16These are mostly homeopathic complex remedies. So, now comes the big challenge for all die-hard conventional physicians. I am an alternative practitioner, and we alternative practitioners of course work very holistically. And the human being of course consists of body, soul and spirit. Soul and spirit usually fall by the wayside in medicine. But for me the question was of course: how do I bring a sick cell back into the biological, and I say as a spiritual person also into the divine order, so that real healing can happen? And normal medicines can't do that. So in my opinion a kind of energy medicine, vibrational medicine or information medicine is needed.

6:22:18Whatever you call it doesn't matter at all. And also very helpful are, let's say, mental or spiritual healing powers. And very suitable here are of course homeopathic high potencies, and also homeopathic constitutional therapy. I'm not a classical homeopath, but I consider it very suitable. Then anthroposophic therapy, spagyrics, Chinese medicine and certainly a few other therapies. And as for mental healing powers, I'm a big, big fan of prayer, for example, of healing meditations, healing energy, visualisation or other things that can bring about a positive orientation towards healing. I myself have healing hands; I inherited them from my mother, and they are simply excellent.

6:23:26I find that patients who use not only naturopathic and conventional medical therapy but also, let's say, precisely these unusual methods are at a great advantage over other patients. And I also think the whole thing goes far beyond placebo effects, although of course one has to say that anyone who achieves such great placebo effects is really top-notch too, because that is also a very great mental healing power. Exactly, and otherwise with us alternative practitioners we always include the psyche: it is important to have good mental hygiene, it's good to eat healthily. A diet never hurts. And other things too: being happy again, laughing and leading a good life naturally contribute a great deal to healing.

6:24:41Exactly, so I would like to tell the vaccine-injured not to give up, to look for the right therapy and also for the right therapist, because that too is a big factor that plays a big role in healing. Exactly, so I would wish you and tell you: hold on, don't lose patience. I am deeply convinced that you can regain your health. Thank you very much. Thank you, thank you, dear Christina. Thank you very much for this great talk. I have to contradict one thing slightly, but nothing serious. You said that with most doctors soul and spirit fall by the wayside. I think those gathered on Zoom today, the speakers, have repeatedly made pleas for holistic medicine, for the human being as body, mind and soul.

6:25:40And I think I speak for all colleagues: Andreas Diemer, Christian Schubert, Walter Weber, Professor Haditsch and everyone. And the biologist Professor Hockertz also pointed out right at the beginning that psychoneuroimmunology is something very, very important. So I think we are all in the same boat, and we are all thinking in the same direction: that of course the human being must always be viewed holistically in order to really help them. But there are no die-hard conventional physicians here, Ronny. Yes, yes, yes, none of us are die-hards. And the die-hard conventional physicians, I don't know, that's a thing of yesterday, I think, somehow. What I also liked is that you mentioned that elimination is a word that sometimes rubs us up the wrong way, because what is supposed to be eliminated, how, with what?

6:26:25Yes, I'll move on now to the next talk. Walter Weber already mentioned earlier that fasting or dietary changes can have an effect. And a very special form of nutritional therapy will be presented by Professor Ulrike Kämmerer, who pleasingly is stepping into the ring once more; she was already there at the start today and has held out until now. Thank you for that, dear Ulrike. I look forward to your talk on the ketogenic diet as a form of self-help. Yes, wonderful. I'll switch straight back to my slides for screen sharing.

6:27:11So, now. Good morning, I'd say first of all, at this early hour. The topic is indeed the ketogenic diet as a form of self-help. And Ronny Weikl already mentioned it. This really ties in with the experience Mr Weber reported from a colleague, namely that fasting is in fact a very effective remedy. It's not for nothing that it's called therapeutic fasting. However, four weeks of fasting is of course rather impractical for very many people. And that's why I would like to present the ketogenic diet as a kind of fasting metabolism that is nevertheless practicable for an almost unlimited time, because it continues to supply the body with energy and nutrients.

6:27:59How is a ketogenic diet defined? A ketogenic diet is defined as a very high-fat, strongly carbohydrate-restricted, protein- and calorie-balanced form of nutrition that imitates the starvation metabolism. Hence the therapeutic fasting, and it leads to the appearance, and that is what gives it its name, of ketone bodies, which are then detectable in serum and urine. Many physicians know ketosis only as the pathophysiological state of derailed diabetes. And because of our Western diet, modern medicine has unfortunately completely lost sight of the fact that, from an evolutionary-biological point of view, ketosis is actually our original metabolic state. What is interesting now in connection with the injuries currently occurring in masses is something for which ketosis has been known for some time.

6:29:02This is a paper from Nature Reviews Immunology from many years ago. It says "starving inflammation", that is, the inflammatory reactions. And Ms Wolf said that too, and many others. The decisive criterion in most of the injuries caused by spike, whether through the virus or through the injections, is the inflammatory reaction. The misdirected, practically rampaging inflammatory reaction in the body. And this paper was about a substance called beta-hydroxybutyrate having massive anti-inflammatory effects. Back then it was about strokes. And here, lo and behold, in this box it said that a ketogenic diet can actually inhibit inflammation via this NLRP3 inflammasome.

6:30:02And that is now the interesting point. Because there are a great many papers in which it has actually already been published that the spike protein uses precisely this substance as the trigger for these derailed immune reactions. That means spike stimulates inflammation via this route, among others. And we know from publications, and also from the experience of our clinical studies, that a ketogenic diet can bring this inflammation down. In this respect the decisive thing here is the spike protein; this is what this inflammasome looks like, a multi-protein complex. It stimulates all these inflammatory cascades that occur both in post-vax and in the virus-induced excessive immune reactions. That can be brought under control very well by such ketosis. So what is ketosis?

6:30:57What can you do with it? For one thing, you can actually measure these ketone bodies. Monitoring success is important in this case, so that you know you are getting into it. There are very many dietary options for it. But above all I would like to go into the basics. The ketone bodies mentioned, which arise physiologically in the body when you fast: anyone who has ever fasted for a week knows it. At first you feel pretty bad, and at some point you feel really good. And sometimes you then smell of acetone. That is one of the ketone bodies, but one you don't really want. Acetone is therefore exhaled by the body. But the physiologically usable ones are so-called acetoacetate and hydroxybutyrate; they are the ones that then flood the body and are usable for us. These ketone bodies arise either by my eating a lot of fat or, let's say, from onboard reserves, that is, when body fat mass is broken down.

6:31:57And these fats, the so-called triglycerides, are broken down into three fatty acids. And during fasting or a ketogenic diet these fatty acids can then be converted in the liver into the so-called ketone bodies to supply our very energy-hungry brain. That means these ketone bodies transport energy from fats to the brain, where they can be oxidised without any problem. The brain can mostly not use the fatty acids themselves, or only in very small amounts. That means if we didn't have ketone bodies, we would die very quickly in a famine, because our brain would have no energy any more. A little sugar is still needed, and it is made from this glycerol. Or, and that is the disadvantage of short-term fasting, from the breakdown of protein.

6:32:51And we don't want that. That is why this very high-fat version is a very helpful one. That the whole thing works has been demonstrated in many studies over many, many years. Here is brain metabolism during fasting or a ketogenic diet. And it can be shown that already after two days the ketone bodies rise substantially and the sugar level measured in brain metabolism falls. And that is the effect: the moment our body is well supplied with ketone bodies, the so-called fasting high arises, because the brain, as a great fasting researcher put it, gets super fuel. That it has a positive effect on the brain and thus possibly also on this brain fog can already be seen in a number of ongoing studies showing that the ketogenic diet has a very positive influence on neurodegenerative diseases and dementias.

6:33:52Here Alzheimer's disease. It is meanwhile being researched on a large scale. That means it is definitely an option. That's why I'd like to show briefly here what you can eat. Something ketogenic would look like this, for example. The classic ketogenic diet comes from epilepsy therapy and is calculated in a ratio, which my computer has once again messed up here, of 1.6 to 1, by incorporating so-called medium-chain triglycerides. A note on the slides: they will all go into the accompanying booklet. Then everyone can read it up accordingly.

6:34:35The decisive form of the diet is this one here with the medium-chain triglycerides; it allows a diet that is, let's say, easy to implement. I can take these medium-chain triglycerides in the form of coconut oil, also cream and butter. But above all you can also buy them. They are relatively water-soluble, so you can mix them into any food. Perhaps a little hint right away: because this form of diet has a great deal of potential, we will also write a guide for patients and then offer it via the MWGFD website. This is what a daily plan would look like, because many people can't imagine it. This is a fully calculated ketogenic meal plan. Of course it's not the cake from the bakery round the corner.

6:35:22And the bread isn't what you can buy just anywhere either. By now, however, you can buy ketogenic bread. But you can also bake it yourself. And this entire daily plan has as many carbohydrates as, for example, a bread roll with jam. And if I then add a lot of coconut fat, I get into this ketosis very well. And why am I doing this? As I said at the beginning: inhibiting inflammation. The pharmacon, and it really is a pharmacon, is beta-hydroxybutyrate. It arises at very high levels in ketosis. As a pharmacon it activates the so-called G-protein-coupled receptors 109 and 43. So that is a very clear medical effect that arises here.

6:36:16And these receptors then act on all sorts of cells, among others on macrophages, and then inhibit this inflammasome mentioned at the beginning. A nice side effect: ketone bodies can also intervene in the so-called GABA metabolism. That too is from a publication here. And that has an antidepressant effect. As I said, with fasting you recognise it in this fasting high. Or the runner's high in marathon runners; it arises through this ketone body metabolism in the brain, which would be very helpful precisely with spike injuries involving brain damage through this brain fog. Here is a graphic from a publication where the target structures have already been demonstrated, where ketone bodies have positive effects everywhere.

6:37:06And it always works via these anti-inflammatory effects. On this slide, as I said, everything to read up on. And then it was actually demonstrated in a publication from 2020 that in, in this case actually severe viral infections, and that also applies to the condition after vaccination, it preserves heart function, increases tolerance to oxygen deficiency, improves the microbiome, improves muscle weakness and so on. So that means beta-hydroxybutyrate can actually make a very massive intervention in metabolism, in this case in a positive sense for us. In addition, broccoli was mentioned, I have it here as a picture too, and a great many green plant substances help with the ketogenic diet, because they then provide our gut with dietary fibre, roughage, and this is broken down by our gut microbiome into beta-hydroxybutyrate again, which can then also actually contribute to anti-inflammation via the gut.

6:38:15This is what a ketogenic diet food pyramid looks like. So you can eat very well with it. By the way, you don't have to rely on a lot of meat products either. You can also make the whole thing plant-based, so vegetarian works; there are a few people who do it vegan, but that gets damned difficult and is also not easy to balance in the long run. The decisive thing is that I can then measure this ketosis, here with test strips: normal when I have none, and when I'm in ketosis they change colour. I don't want to go any further now, but rather thank you for listening and point out that important pages are attached to the slides, fat recommendations and recipe recommendations, and all of that can then be viewed in the corresponding accompanying booklet.

6:39:09These are all things cooked and tried out myself with a doctoral student; they work superbly, and over weeks and months, as we did for cancer patients, we cooked and baked every weekend and then held tastings in the laboratory during the week, and it did everyone good. Yes, that's what I wanted to present on this at this late hour. It's worth a try, and it has very clear pharmacological aspects.

6:39:42Yes, thank you, dear Ulrike, for teaching us about this ketogenic diet so fit and so engagingly at such a late hour. For me it was very new, but it looked delicious. Perhaps we should also point out the book that you will soon make available or offer together with Ulrike Gonder. We will soon also promote it on the MWGFD website, where a small booklet will appear that vaccine-injured people in particular can use to be introduced fairly easily to this ketogenic diet. With the next talk I at least needn't have a bad conscience regarding the time, because if I think about it, it's just quarter to seven with him, a nice early evening, while here at 0:44 we're already, well, pulling an all-nighter, and our, I think our simultaneous interpreters are slowly going crazy too.

6:40:41I hope they will hold out for the next talks, the next three talks. I'm pleased, dear Michael, that you have joined us from Ontario, Canada. You are a doctor and biochemist, Professor Michael Palmer, a whistleblower from the very first hour. He is also the coordinator of Doctors for Covid Ethics, a kind of international sister group of MWGFD. Sucharit Bhakdi and a few others from our MWGFD are also part of it. I look forward to your talk. You have taken on a difficult, possibly also thankless topic. It's about shedding, and we wanted to know from you: is it realistic? Are there dangers? What can you tell us about it, dear Michael?

6:41:22Yes, thank you very much. Could I perhaps have the first slide? And while it's being shown, I could perhaps add that I'm no longer a professor, because they fired me here for refusing the vaccination. And that's actually quite all right, because universities today are more or less undergoing a cultural revolution, and I don't need to be part of that any more. Could I see the first slide? Unfortunately I can't tell right now whether the slides are already showing. Ah, there it is. Okay, thank you very much. And straight to the next slide, please. So, shedding: what do we mean by it? It has already been mentioned here.

6:42:01We mean the transmission of either vaccine directly or of the spike protein induced by the vaccines from a vaccinated person to an unvaccinated person. And, according to anecdotal reports at least, this sometimes leads to the unvaccinated person falling ill with various symptoms. Since I don't treat patients myself, I refrain from judging. I can't assess how realistic it is. I must also note that there is very little literature, actually none, so we are entirely dependent on plausibility considerations here. Next slide, please. Okay, so there is one case of shedding that is well documented.

6:42:50And that is the transmission of mRNA vaccines in breast milk. I found three studies. The first, earliest study found no mRNA in breast milk. However, it also used an unsuitable method to isolate the mRNA. The other two studies were better in this respect. And they promptly found mRNA in breast milk in the first days after the mother's vaccination. The third study here is especially striking. Here almost half of all mothers tested were positive for mRNA. So we must assume that in this case the regular intramuscular injection is evidently enough to make the mRNA detectable in breast milk. One must also bear in mind that in a small percentage of all injected patients the vaccine will end up in the bloodstream.

6:43:51That's hard to estimate, but perhaps one per cent, three per cent, in that range. And of course one must assume that the blood level of mRNA will then be much higher and accordingly so will transmission into breast milk. So the infant will then probably also be exposed to a considerably higher dose. Next slide, please. There are actually several case reports in the VAERS database of infants who fell ill or even died shortly after their mother's vaccination. And here we have an example. This infant falls ill with thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura, a manifestation we also know from vaccinees themselves.

6:44:39And this clinical course certainly suggests that this is a vaccine victim. Yes, and there are several more case reports without fatal outcome, but in which there was also bleeding into the intestine. So one must assume that, at least with mothers who were perhaps accidentally injected intravenously, enough mRNA is actually transmitted to endanger the children as well. Next slide, please. Then there is also transmission through the placenta. Strictly speaking that is of course not shedding, but it is worth discussing too. We must assume that such transmission occurs. Why? Because in vivo the lipid nanoparticles of the mRNA vaccines acquire a coat consisting of the body's own proteins.

6:45:38And in particular of apolipoproteins, whose normal role is to control the transport of lipoprotein particles. So the vaccine particles disguise themselves as lipoproteins and are then transported accordingly. That explains their accumulation in the liver, and also in steroid-hormone-producing endocrine glands, which include the placenta. And the placenta, as is known, can also

6:46:10pass lipoprotein particles on to the embryo and foetus. And one must assume that here too for the vaccine particles. There are also a few animal experiments, very inadequate of course, but still, from Moderna, which also showed malformations in rat experiments. So one must assume that at least part of the vaccine can actually pass into the embryonic and foetal circulation. Next slide, please.

6:46:44And well, then one must ask whether transmission can occur by other routes. One certainly cannot rule out that small amounts are also released into sweat or saliva and so on. But the question then is of course how much of it can really be transmitted to another person. The amounts are probably small, and of course the volumes of fluid transmitted are also very small. So I really can't imagine that relevant amounts are transmitted here. If that were the case, if the small amount of fluid that can realistically be transmitted were enough to make the recipient ill, then one would have to assume that the vaccinated person from whom this fluid comes should already have died three times over from the remaining amount. So I don't consider that realistic.

6:47:44There are exceptions, and that has to do with the behaviour of these particles. So far we have assumed that the transmitted nucleic acids, the mRNA from the vaccine, cannot replicate. It is supposedly designed so that it cannot replicate, so it is not infectious. That is the difference from a regular infection. However, there is also a variant of mRNA that amplifies itself. Next slide, please. This is illustrated here. On the left we see the blueprint for the regular, conventional mRNA vaccination. It contains only a single gene, for the spike protein. And the mRNA taken up by the cell cannot replicate in the cell.

6:48:31It can only be read and induce the formation of proteins. But then there is this other variant, self-amplifying mRNA, which, in addition to the vaccine antigen, in this case the spike protein, also codes for an RNA polymerase. And this RNA polymerase can first multiply the vaccine RNA taken up by the cell. And then spike protein molecules can be produced from all these copies. So within this cell that first has an amplifying effect. But it can also happen that these mRNA molecules, these daughter molecules, are packaged into exosomes, small membrane vesicles that are pinched off by the cell. These can be taken up by other cells.

6:49:21And then, in principle, the mRNA could be multiplied again in this next generation of cells. That means this mRNA here could behave like a virus. And one cannot completely rule out that such mRNA-laden exosomes are also excreted and transmitted. And because it potentially behaves like an infectious agent, one is no longer limited by the amount. And the same applies, this was still visible on the previous slide, but we don't need to go back now: for the adenovirus-based vaccines from AstraZeneca and Janssen one cannot completely rule out that these crippled viruses, which are also supposed not to be able to replicate themselves, somehow recombine with natural adenoviruses that happen to be present at the same time.

6:50:15Then some Frankenstein viruses come out of it that could well be infectious and whose pathogenic properties are unknown. In both cases, both with self-amplifying mRNA and with these adenoviruses, we must probably assume that illness would only occur after a reasonably long incubation period. So this hypothetical explanation is no good for explaining symptoms that arise very quickly or even immediately during contact between vaccinated and unvaccinated people. Next slide, please. And what did we have here? I can't read it at all; it's all so small.

6:51:06I had relied on being able to read my own slides during the talk, but I can't. I can't remember what was on here. I'm sorry. Double-click on it. What did you say? Double-click on it; then you might see it large.

6:51:33Okay. Or fix the window. And at the top right of the window a menu opens. Okay. Good. Yes. Okay. So the question is: what could simulate shedding? Sorry for the interruption. What could simulate shedding?

6:52:14One effect I can well imagine would be a so-called reverse day-care effect. We have already heard that the vaccinated are often immunosuppressed, so they will be susceptible to all sorts of viruses and will most likely let these viruses replicate in large amounts, and they can then transmit large amounts of viruses, just as small children who go to day care normally do, bringing some virus or other home with them. They don't have immunity yet, so they really incubate these viruses and then transmit them to the rest of the family. And today this function could of course also be performed by immunosuppressed vaccinated adults.

6:53:00That is one possibility. Then one hears anecdotal reports of disturbances of the menstrual cycle in unvaccinated women. One hypothetical explanation I have heard is disturbed pheromone secretion in the vaccinated. The background is a controversial theory according to which the menstrual cycles of women living together are synchronised by the secretion of pheromones. And if this secretion is disturbed in the vaccinated, then perhaps the synchronisation breaks down too. But I don't quite see yet that this disturbance would be enough to lead to real disturbances of the cycle in the unvaccinated. So I consider that a somewhat speculative story.

6:53:52Next slide, please. And with that we are already at the end. So the plausible transmission routes are breast milk and perhaps blood transfusions. That cannot be ruled out, again especially with small children, for whom the amount of blood transmitted is relatively high relative to their own body weight. So the transmission of mRNA, which can actually be detected in the blood of vaccinated persons for several weeks, could well be significant and could be enough to make these children ill too, and transplacental transmission. So breast milk, blood and transplacental. Everything else I consider difficult to explain. With the exception, as I said, of these self-amplifying mRNA and adenovirus derivatives, which may behave like infectious agents. Thank you very much.

6:55:01Thank you very much, dear Michael, for these interesting remarks. Yes, this raises once more the question of whether blood banks for the unvaccinated should be introduced. More people are now organising themselves. As was just said, one cannot rule out that spike protein and other things and mRNA can be transmitted through blood donation, when we know that spiked vaccinated people can go and donate blood after just one day. So I would have my concerns too. Thank you very much, dear Michael. All the best and a good evening to Canada. We'll stay international. But I think we'll make a small change. The last talk is from our Japanese sister group, so to speak, from Japan, who contacted us some time ago, around the end of the year.

6:55:57This talk has been recorded. I suggest we bring in Wolfgang Wodarg, who has also been waiting in the queue for a long time. The evening is well advanced. I don't know how the simultaneous interpreters are doing. I think we'll first bring forward Wolfgang Wodarg's talk, and the recording the Japanese sent us in German and English we will play at the very end of the event. Wolfgang, are you ready for your talk on corruption? Yes, hello, good evening everyone, I'm here. For me it's already an hour later than for you. And so it's already heading towards morning. The sun will soon rise here. I have set out to say a little about the systemic background to what we have experienced.

6:56:56And corruption is the abuse of entrusted goods for private gain. If something is entrusted to you and you then abuse it for yourself, that falls under the term. And what does that have to do with what we have experienced in our society? Our society has many specialists and many, just like our body, many special organs. We have many authorities, many specialised institutes, and we have to be able to rely on them. And everywhere we live there are organisations based on division of labour. It's like that in humans; it's like that in cells. And it develops in human societies too. We see the nerve cells up there, which then form according to the demands.

6:57:50And we see here human "cells" at the bottom, photographed from an aeroplane, which structure themselves in a similar way depending on where communication takes place. So communication leads to life developing. And in our society we have very, very complicated life. There is then a division of labour between the various areas and subsystems of our society. We entrust them with very specific things. For example, what we call knowledge. We first get that as children, from educators, from here below, from teachers, it's taught to us. We have to be able to rely on that. In science we get what people argue about with each other, doubting everything, and what they then arrive at: the latest state of science.

6:58:37And everyone has to rely on it, judges and politicians. And everyone draws on it. And there we have to rely on it, and that doesn't always work. We're seeing that right now. And the media also give us the daily knowledge we need about what is happening in the world so that we can make decisions. That doesn't work any more either. Those are two systems that no longer work at all. Politics: we entrust it with power. Power, namely the power to make rules. To make rules that we all then want to abide by. And there too, I think, we have seen that rules are being made that are no longer for us but for third parties.

6:59:14So here, they all no longer work, these organs. None of them do what they are actually there for any more. Institutionally corrupted. And that has nothing to do with bribery; mostly these are even legal processes. They are even things that are not illegal but are set up that way with the help of laws. It's getting out of hand. But the entrusting of power by the people to a government is something that didn't exist like this in the past. In the past it was more feudal power. People simply had a lot of money and could afford soldiers and could rob others and build a castle and so on. And then there were the royal houses, and then it was the feudal families who, with their retinue, kept the people in such a way that they couldn't rise up.

7:00:13And that was a hierarchical construction. Then came the French Revolution and other revolutions. And then all power was supposed to come from the people. So, that's where we are now. We have our Basic Law. And we empower others and say: you have power. You are our representative. You may now vote. You may now say who will be our chancellor and so on. So that goes from the bottom up. And yet all power comes from the people. So, and the problem then is, once we've done that, we have entrusted a great deal that they can then do with this power. One thing is the creation and use of communication media. Communication media sounds like news, but it isn't. Money is a communication medium that we agree on. Because paper is actually worthless, and a piece of metal too. Power is also a communication medium.

7:01:11It is agreed that someone who has the majority of votes has power. Knowledge is a communication medium in which we exchange the state of knowledge and argue about it. Or norms or other definitions. Something is laid down and then applies for the time being until it is changed. And this power to make something like that valid for all of us, so that we can really use it every day, we entrust to some organisations, politicians or civil servants or authorities or institutions. But the decision about natural resources, about land, about mineral resources, about all these things, these allocation decisions, are also entrusted by us. And then we also entrust the making of laws, which we then abide by.

7:02:02So these are important things that determine our whole lives. Allocation is a special topic of its own. We also discussed that for a long time in the German Bundestag. Who should decide, on what ethical and legal basis, for whom? What, and how much of it, is declared justified? That's the legislators, macro level. Then what is provided: that's, for example, the health insurers and the associations of statutory health insurance physicians in the health system, who determine the structures. And what is ultimately provided? That's the micro level. Is it the doctor who says you don't need that, or you'll get that? That is, who makes the indications. So, but we have very, very different interests in our society. I have an example I like to show.

7:02:50This is a health insurer. They once found out that 10 per cent of the insured cause 80 per cent of the costs. That's a huge burden. So from the health insurer's point of view these 10 per cent are terribly expensive. Yes, they need an incredible amount. So, but then there are other people in our society who also look at these 10 per cent and say: oh, they have such-and-such a disease. We can earn a tremendous amount of money from that as a hospital, or a great deal, or as rehab, or as a pharmaceutical company. So the health economy is practically searching for these people who have fallen into need, these 10 per cent. And with these conflicts, politics always has to find rules so that they don't come to blows and so that things go well across society.

7:03:37Here we have a job description for a managing director, as an example. That's how we do it. These are quite normal, proper, good people who achieve things in business. They are supposed to deliver quality-oriented growth in line with targets. They are supposed to achieve key financial figures, profit, liquidity and return on sales. Market share increase of 1 per cent depending on market leadership and competitive activity. Annual sales growth in the range of 6 to 8 per cent. New customer growth in the range of, that's what he's given when the job is advertised. And if he doesn't do it, a new one is brought in, he's fired. That means these people who work in business, quite legitimately, great, capable people, make sure their company is successful, and that's what they are hired for.

7:04:25That's normal in our society. Business is an engine that spurs us on to achievement and has also brought us a great deal of quality of life. Only when the thing gets out of hand is it difficult. And if business, if business always wants to grow, then there are big problems. Then the market is suddenly limited. But since the greed of this business is very, very great, they have to keep growing, growing, growing; that's how it has been so far. So they have tried to turn to politics and open up new business fields. And for that you have to change the laws a bit. For that you have to see to it that you're allowed to do things you weren't allowed to do before, and all that.

7:05:08And in the past the company bosses used to go into politics themselves and say: couldn't you, you're our representative after all, couldn't you put in a word for me somehow, for our business? But that's long over. That may still have been the case in Bonn, in the last century, up to 1980 or so. Then it was an associations lobby. The butchers' associations came, the associations of market gardeners. And they all came along and said what they wanted. Today there are huge corporations, the lobbying industry. And you see the picture of Berlin there, the small one at the bottom right. Those are all the lobbying offices. And in Brussels it's even worse.

7:05:54These are lobbying consultants who also work with PR companies that have close contacts with the media. If you look at the offers of these lobbying consultants, these large corporations, on the internet, you find that they do monitoring of members of parliament. They look closely at which member has which preferences and where they can somehow be caught. Or they do astroturfing. Or they do grassroots detection. That means they look at where currents are developing in society that we can use for ourselves, that we can support. And if you have chronically ill people, for example, a company comes along that wants to sell something and sends its speaker to this self-help group of the chronically ill.

7:06:44And he can then make sure right away that this self-help group makes noise with politicians and says: more must be done for us; we need the medicines. That means they then use them as a vehicle to push their interests through loudly in politics. That's what it's called too. And if there's no self-help group, they make one. They make one. And that's called astroturfing. It is offered as such by these companies. So they create their own initiatives among the population, which they pay for, finance and build up and push. It's a huge industry that is currently having a tremendous boom. And it's all permitted. They're allowed to do it. And that has led to us now having quite a lot of problems.

7:07:31The economy, business, has increasingly assimilated things. It has grabbed hold of the financial system. Because in finance you trade in risks. They don't make sure that money keeps its value, which is actually the task; instead they make profits by having their hands on the money. Or the private military companies, which actually undermine the state's monopoly on the use of force. Or the privatised universities and research, the sponsor hunters who roam science and no longer look for truth but only ever for research funding. Or here, public health. The whole thing, the very name "health economy": health is a part of the economy.

7:08:18And the economy in which we earn money, I showed earlier, that's the profile of a manager in business. And in journalism too. That's embedded journalism. That used to exist only in wars. Today it's embedded in business. Journalists have very, very close relationships with business, and so on. In many cases it's also called public-private partnership. And a great deal of bribery happens there without it really standing out. It's not that a single official is bribed; a whole office is influenced by making sure the right bosses get there and the right politicians are elected who go along with it all, and so on.

7:09:03And in the pharmaceutical industry, which we're so annoyed about right now, the result is that they are also punished, of course, because they acted criminally. They all have criminal records here. And you can see the share of sanctions in the respective annual turnover. And you see Bristol and Pfizer; they have 2.3 per cent in fines. And the share of fines in turnover was once 4.6 per cent. Or the share of fines at Glaxo was quite high once, it was one per cent. That was probably the narcolepsy cases with the swine flu back then, or others too. But that means they of course factor it in when they set their prices. And while they are being punished and begging for forgiveness and saying we're opening a compliance department and it will never happen again, they've already got the next dirty trick going.

7:09:56Because these managers are supposed to earn money, and because they calculate what pays and what doesn't. They walk over dead bodies. Unfortunately that's how it is. And here the development is summarised a bit. In the past there was a white herd. This is an authority here. There were two black sheep; they were bribed and they were corrupt. And then came the economisation of nursing, medicine, science and the media; that is, they were increasingly geared towards having to earn money. And if you have to earn money, this secondary interest that I have to earn money displaces what was actually entrusted to me, namely making sure people don't fall ill.

7:10:43And today it's almost the case that in the clinic or the pharmaceutical company or wherever, they are all black sheep; they have to code. Of course they code Covid-19, because that brings in more for the clinic. Of course. And the doctor in his practice gets 15 euros for every swab, or 30 euros for an injection when he gives the vaccination. Of course; he's not stupid. He already thinks like a business manager. And that leads to us having systematic, systemic corruption that arises simply because the secondary interests, the economic secondary interests, completely reshape the whole operation. And then there are a few individual white sheep; those are the whistleblowers.

7:11:27And whistleblowers are always a nice indicator that something is getting out of hand, that something like this has happened. So, where do lobbyists operate most of all? Where goals are defined. That's in parliaments, in public, in the media, but also in the parties. They are tremendously active there. And if you go to a party conference, you see them all there with their nice stands. The car companies and, I don't know who else, the energy companies, the waste disposal companies, they have huge ones. And there's sparkling wine and chocolates. And they also partly finance the parties. And then also where norms are set. Global norms, Europe-wide, national or subject-specific norms; I'll come back to that in a moment.

7:12:13Then also where prioritisation takes place. We've heard a lot about that. Who gets what first? They just abused it. Who do we ram this injection into first, the one that makes people ill? That's what they discussed. That was perverse. But normally you say: if we don't have enough money, whom do we help first? Who needs it most? That's the right prioritisation. And then where interests are forming, that is, social movements, self-help, continuing education. They watch that; there are special companies for it. These are intelligence firms that comb the internet and track down grassroots movements. Such a firm, for example, [found] the swine flu cases in Mexico. That was the company Veratect.

7:12:53It had the job of finding these swine flu cases. They went through the hospitals and did these tests everywhere, and then found 300 cases by the time the WHO had already declared the pandemic. They blew it up. That was a typical case. That's why I've known the whole outfit for so long. So, now, where are norms set? Here you see those at UN level, all the sets of norms; the WHO of course in health. These are all sets of norms for health. But also the ILO, which keeps an eye on occupational health, or the FAO, nutritional health, or the patent [body], which grants or doesn't grant patents. And the World Trade Organization deals with it too, because you can earn money with health and illness. Then the European level: the European CDC in Stockholm, or the European Parliament sets norms, or the Council of Europe also sets norms.

7:13:44There is, for example, the Pharmacopoeia, which sits at the Council of Europe, where it is defined what an organ is, what a tissue is, what cells are and so on. That is all done there. That is the basis for communication within the pharmaceutical sector. It is defined there. Or the EMA. Yes, we know it now. I don't need to say anything about it. European patents. That is of course also very important. And the European Commission decides pretty much on its own authority. And at German level there are also all these sets of norms in health. I don't need to list them all. Everyone contributes their mite and says what we may do, what we may not do, what is allowed and what isn't. And then there are all those that can't be assigned locally but still have some significance worldwide.

7:14:30I can't go into them individually now. But the WHO now, I can show you again; we know by now how institutionally corrupted it is. We know that the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation is the second-largest sponsor. And even if it says Germany here, or America or whatever, these states that give money are practically laundering the money of their industry and giving it to the WHO. That means if Denmark, for example, gives the WHO money, they do it, for example, to fight diabetes. Because Novo Nordisk said: Danish government, see to it that you get a programme like that going at the WHO so that more is done for diabetics, only for the selling industries.

7:15:12That means economic interests here give the WHO money for economic interests. These are all earmarked funds. They are earmarked funds given to the WHO. The WHO is practically a lever with which you can bring your economic interests in the health sector to market. It is a completely institutionally corrupted organisation. You can forget it if you want health. And they can do a lot. For example, they have the ICD codes; they make them; they've now made new ones: who is vaccinated, who isn't. And all this nonsense; they can define with it and thereby also do the groundwork for the digital data collectors, who then know exactly how people behave and so on, and how it is evaluated, what the clinics earn money with, what they know not to code, and the doctors in private practice.

7:16:06So they know a tremendous amount because they shape and define the language with which the health system practically says what is going on and communicates. They have the power of definition over language, over diagnoses. Then, for example, they tried to redefine herd immunity. I mention that only as a funny remark. They said herd immunity can only be achieved through vaccination. And they later withdrew that again. But also the normal values: what is normal blood sugar, what is a normal cholesterol value and so on. What is an outbreak? If three new bird, if three new H5N1 tests are positive somewhere in Asia, the WHO can already say: oh, there's an outbreak. And then they can go there with their big troop, and then these people come who do lots of PCR tests and then they find more and more, and so on. We all know that.

7:16:58They also define what an emergency is. For example, monkeypox. That is an emergency of international concern. And nobody really knows whether these spots being counted are really monkeypox or whether they are something else for which no differential diagnosis was made and which only look like it. So whether it's herpes or something else. They can always use all that, and they blow it up. They did it with bird flu; they did it with swine flu. With Ebola they waited until the pharmaceutical industry could develop its vaccines. And when that still wasn't enough, they had another small outbreak in the Congo so that they finally got approval for the Ebola vaccine. So I have been able to see often enough on the ground what a dirty business the WHO is running in Africa.

7:17:52And they determine, for example, what immunity is. So they really have so much dirt on their hands that the stick should have broken long ago. Here's an example of what that means. If the fat, the cholesterol value: they once lowered the limit from 240 to 200. And the result was that 86% more patients suddenly needed treatment. Only because they changed the value here. And the same with high blood pressure, with blood sugar, and so on, with the thyroid. So they have influence on norm-setting, and thereby they create diseases; thereby they create the sick. Then we have, yes, what we already heard earlier: that the WHO now wants, via the International Health Regulations, to extend its power even further and eliminate a country's autonomy in times of actual or assumed public health emergencies.

7:18:50Quite clearly; we heard that earlier. To define, binding for all, the early warning criteria for assessing and progressively updating the national, regional or global risk posed by an event of unknown cause or source. That's what it says. In the event of non-compliance by a state, to authorise other states to impose sanctions. If a state doesn't go along, the others may lash out and may move in, or may send their military, or what not, use force, or a private army. Even on the mere assumption of an emergency, protocols are started. It may then do that, and its protocols, the pandemic protocol, we've seen what that looks like with swine flu and now with Corona.

7:19:37They want to be empowered to enforce compliance with WHO emergency guidelines regarding infrastructure, capital expenditure, information gathering and the implementation of emergency measures. They say what must then be done in the states, and that is then binding. They even want to be allowed to confiscate the financial resources for it.

7:20:04We heard earlier: human dignity and so on no longer plays a role; now they may do anything. So they really want to arrogate totalitarian rule to themselves. This criminal organisation wants to rule the world with the help of health, and they themselves say what is healthy and what isn't. Corruption is the abuse of entrusted power for private advantage or gain. The private advantage: these are not individual people, but organisations in which people come together who want to make money, public limited companies or big banks or big fund managers or whatever. These are all large organisations whose primary interest is private gain, and they don't give a damn about what we as democrats want to do publicly for one another; instead they wreck it all because they want to make money, because they are toxic, because they are greedy.

7:21:01We don't see it, and when we entrust something, when we entrust power, we must see what is being done with it, so that we can rap them on the knuckles in time and say: stop, it can't go on like this; we don't want that; that's not what we elected you for. We need transparency so that our trust can be justified. But we have secrecy, we have opacity, we have no media we can rely on. As for research results: if they don't suit the sponsor, they simply aren't published. There is no transparency at all in research; there is no transparency in politics. The media: we depend on them; if we want to learn more than what happens in our neighbourhood, we need media.

7:21:48We can't go everywhere ourselves; we depend on the transparency that the media, that good journalists, are supposed to provide. Good journalists are those who always pay attention to what we need to know in order to decide correctly as people, as citizens, and who then obtain for us what is important for such decisions. They have to [divide it up]; some take care of this, others of that; then there are contradictions and we then have to decide, similar to science. What is transparency? Transparency means circumstances under which mutual checks would be possible at any time, and therefore, because everyone knows this, the effort of mistrust can be replaced by trust.

7:22:28If I know the other person can see at any time if I'm doing something wrong, I won't do it in the first place, and of course that makes life tremendously easier, because the whole effort of mistrust disappears. If we look at the communication that shapes this society, we have the various levels: individual, private partnerships, families, neighbourhoods, small town, city district, then big city, then federal state, nation state and then the whole globe. The unit gets bigger and bigger, and here of course communication, which also means transparency, is simply direct conversations, visits, meetings, notices, local media; so in the municipality you can still manage to keep track of what's happening. In a small town you know your newspaper and can perhaps still go to the editor, or the local internet channel that exists there, or whatever else there is.

7:23:23But here it already starts; the overview is already gone; dependence on the media is very, very great, and transparency depends on how the media function. And here, yes, it gets confusing. But then the new thing is the internet, and the internet can be used in the village, some people even talk to each other via the internet when sitting at the same table, and it can be used globally. So it's something completely new that can also allow society to organise itself in a completely new way. With the help of the internet, completely new political structures are possible that weren't possible before. We don't yet know everything that's possible there, but we're experiencing examples of it right now.

7:24:06And as far as health is concerned, if we say we want to make sure people live healthily, there are certain things we can entrust here at local level. We don't need media for that, we don't need big other organisations, huge corporations; we can do that ourselves. For example all the care, child-rearing, healthy nutrition and basic medical care; it's also enough if there is a trusted family doctor or perhaps a paediatrician too, and you know them all. So basic care is manageable. That's what we actually want to ensure, because we need everything else much more rarely.

7:24:48And this basic medical care belongs in a regional budget, as the Scandinavians show us, so that you know there is so and so much money for everyone, and then people argue about what is done with this money, and if necessary something is bought with it, another nurse is hired, or another doctor, and so on. That means the Scandinavians have very manageable basic care, and first send a nurse before the doctor comes, and they work together like the people in our hospitals, only without walls. So they can structure it all wonderfully and very subsidiarily. Subsidiarity is practically a condition for democracy.

7:25:33We can only have democracy where we have ordered society subsidiarily. But I can't go into that further now. Yes, overall I'd like to come back to my favourite formula, which I ask you to learn by heart. My favourite formula is resilience. A society that stays good, that can withstand things, that doesn't get sick and that grows and thrives, must have transparency; very important. The more transparency there is, and the more people understand what is going on, the faster they notice and correct mistakes, the better, the more resilient this society is. And the bigger it is, that's size at the bottom, and the more complex, the more complicated, the more specialists are needed, the harder it becomes to keep an overview, and the easier it is, when you depend on specialists, for them to do something that isn't intended; they can do their own thing, can be corrupted again, institutionally or personally. That means this formula, when you take on responsibility in politics, and when it's about who does what, how do we do it, we have these big care corporations here driving through the streets in their little cars competing with each other, and yet people are poorly cared for, let's say: don't we want to change that? Can we do it ourselves? Can't we arrange it ourselves in the

7:27:02neighbourhood, or can't we take away a great deal of what we can do ourselves, so that we always go in this direction: more transparency and doing it on as small a scale as possible, so that it stays manageable, so that it remains our business. Yes, that's really what could save the whole thing. But what I showed at the beginning, here with the WHO for example, or what I showed here with these corrupted institutions: the consequence is that such things are possible, or also what the lobbyists do, who can now, for money, present us with a false picture of the world and harness the media. So there is a great deal here that goes off the rails when things are not transparent.

7:27:54Okay, that's perhaps enough on the topic of a systemic view of what we are currently experiencing. Wow, wow, wow, wow, dear Wolfgang, what a firework you've set off at such a late hour. Incredible how rousing and lively that still works with you at this point, this late at night, but a great plea for democracy and transparency. Thank you very much for that, and you have shown us what the evil is that we have to thank for all current events. You described it very well. Yes, with that we now come to the last contribution. It is a recorded contribution sent to us by a Japanese group of colleagues, a doctors' group, who pleasingly got in touch with us at the end of last year.

7:28:44We also talked with each other via Zoom. Similar to MWGFD, they have founded a group called the Volunteer Medical Association of Japan. They were only founded in February 2022, but shortly afterwards also set up the Japan Vaccine After-Effects Treatment Study Group, with which they take care of treating the vaccine-injured and exchange information on how best to treat after-effects of Corona vaccines. In this contribution they refer to a very special kind of medicine called Kampo, a form of herbal medicine based more on traditional Chinese medicine, and present a special, uniquely prepared medicine prepared by a specialist, actually almost a herbal remedy, which contains a single animal ingredient, namely an extract from a scorpion.

7:29:53That's what they present in this contribution. We recently had a longer Zoom call. I was very impressed, and I'm really very grateful to Mr Izumi Kamijo, who translated it all. The

7:30:11leader is a cardiologist named Dr Akinori Fujisawa, and he recorded this contribution in English. And afterwards the OVALmedia team can, at the very end, I'd like to do my final sign-off first and express my thanks, and then I'd suggest that at the very end, with nothing coming afterwards, we play this contribution from our Japanese friends, which is available both in English and in German translation, so the respective channels can be played without bothering the simultaneous interpreters again. I'd like to say about the medicine presented here: our staff have already phoned around German pharmacies to see whether it can be obtained here at all, and we have already found a few pharmacies, so if there is interest you can contact us soon, and we may put a short publication on the website about where best to obtain it.

7:31:15Yes, now we come to the end; as I said, the contribution comes afterwards, so please stay tuned for it. Time is really very far advanced, ladies [and gentlemen], and I thank you, on behalf of MWGFD, all of you who are still at your screens now, and of course also all those who will watch the recording of our symposium later. You

7:31:53[the speakers, who] with their great contributions made this evening a firework display and kept us going through these more than seven hours, seven and a half hours, that we've been together here. And I would like to thank for the great support without which we could not have managed this event, especially our highly motivated, creative staff member Petra, who looks after the MWGFD office; the editor-in-chief of the New Media Portal, Elisabeth, who also spares no effort and is always helpful everywhere and steps in wherever her help is needed; our press officer Claudia; also the staff member from the very first hour who takes care of all incoming emails, Doreen; my daughter Julia was also busy today and accomplished quite a bit in the control room in our kitchen; I also thank our team of advisers in the background, Uwe and Günther, who have been doing a lot of work for us pro bono, that is, unpaid, for weeks; and warm thanks also to all our supporters and friends who always stand by us helpfully with their good ideas, thoughts, prayers and, not least, financial means. A heartfelt "Vergelt's Gott", God bless you all. Many thanks also from the bottom of my heart to the great team at OVALmedia, and of course especially today to the simultaneous interpreters, whom we really challenged marathon-style again. I thank you for

7:33:16this top performance you delivered. I would now like to wish all viewers a good night, all viewers and all participants a restful night. I wish you and all of us good luck and God's blessing on our way to a peaceful, free future that does justice to people and creation. Thank you, goodbye, and enjoy the contribution from our friends in Japan. Good night.

7:34:13Hello. Now, three years later, the media are still talking about the infection as they did at the beginning. Is COVID-19 still a disease caused by an unknown virus? No, we know more about this virus.

7:35:03Last year the coronavirus mutated into the Omicron variant in Japan too. Since then the number of severely ill people has fallen significantly. So we know that the virus has become more harmless. It is the media campaign, unchanged and stirring things up for three years, that makes people fear the unknown virus. But more and more people have switched their perception of the virus from unknown to known.

7:35:38In the chaos of the declaration of emergency, an mRNA vaccine with special authorisation appeared as the only effective solution to the COVID-19 pandemic. Two years ago, in February 2021, the first vaccination of healthcare workers began in Japan. At the time the government said the Corona vaccine was to have the following three benefits. The first is preventing infection. The second is preventing the onset of illness even if one is infected. The third is preventing severe illness. However, the effect of the Corona vaccine and the current situation are as follows. Japan has the highest vaccination rate in the world. In terms of the number of infections, however, Japan records a world-record number of new infections every week.

7:36:39It is far from true to say that vaccinations prevent infections and reduce the number of cases and severe illness. In addition, the Japanese government promoted vaccination so strongly that the world's highest rate of additional vaccinations, that is, booster protection, was reached. However, the three preventive effects of the vaccine have turned out to be a big lie. Currently many people in Japan suffer from health problems caused by the mRNA vaccine. According to reports, about 2,000 people have died after vaccination. More than 20,000 people had serious side effects. These figures, which come from the Japanese government, are only the tip of the iceberg. It is estimated that the actual number is probably 10 to 20 times higher.

7:37:41The Volunteer Medical Association of Japan, which I represent, is an organisation of doctors and medical professionals. Founded in February 2022, we first examined the government's measures against Covid-19 infections and called for the vaccination programmes to be stopped. Our aim is to protect the safety and health of the population. As of January this year, the organisation has a total of around 1,400 members. The actual number is probably higher, because many employees fear dismissal from their hospitals and avoid being included in the membership list. In Japan there are organisations of nurses, associations of bereaved families of vaccine victims, associations of patients with vaccine injuries, a cross-party group of parliamentarians and various other groups opposed to the Corona vaccination policy.

7:38:45They all cooperate with one another. Next I would like to discuss the current situation of patients with vaccine injuries in Japan and their treatment methods. In Japan there are still very few hospitals and clinics that treat vaccine injuries. The Volunteer Medical Association of Japan has published on its website the hospitals and clinics that treat vaccine injuries and has focused on building up a treatment system. In addition, in March 2022 the Japan Vaccine After-Effects Treatment Study Group was organised, mainly by doctors gathered in the Volunteer Medical Association of Japan. Since then this group has held study sessions every two weeks to give talks and exchange information on treatment methods.

7:39:50Meanwhile more than 120 doctors, dentists and veterinarians have joined the group. Now I would like to discuss the current state of the Japanese health system in view of the ever-growing number of patients with vaccine injuries. Most hospitals and doctors deal with patients with vaccine injuries evasively or negligently. When testing for the cause there are no specific findings, and therefore many are regarded as unexplained or unknown. [Patients have little] access to medical care and advice, which turns many patients into unwelcome refugees. Vaccine injuries are hardly noticed by the public; their existence is strictly concealed by the mainstream media. Governments and medical societies do not engage with treatments such as ivermectin and vitamin C, which have already proved effective in treating vaccine injuries in other countries.

7:40:58In view of this reality, the following treatment strategies were discussed by the Japan Vaccine After-Effects Treatment Group: reducing immune hyperactivity and improving natural immunity; alleviating intravascular hypercoagulability and antithrombotic therapy; improving neurological functions, including autonomic and cognitive functions; improving antioxidant capacity and detoxification functions; improving nutritional balance, including B vitamins and iron; dealing with food allergies and improving degrading intestinal conditions.

7:41:50Specific treatments include nutritional therapy, antioxidant therapy, ivermectin, intravenous therapy, traditional Chinese medicine, homeopathy, Ayurveda and epipharyngeal abrasive therapy. In a survey of doctors in the Japan Vaccine After-Effects Treatment Study Group conducted at the end of last year, traditional Chinese medicine known as Kampo therapy was listed as the number 1 treatment method that we believe is highly effective in treating patients with vaccine injuries. Because of the limited time available today, we cannot discuss the details of Chinese Kampo therapy. However, we believe further information can be exchanged on future occasions.

7:42:51The Corona Vaccine Removal Chinese Powdered Medicine, developed by a TCM specialist in the Japan Vaccine After-Effects Treatment Study Group, contains, as stated here, five kinds of Chinese crude drugs. So far it has been administered to a total of about 100 patients over the last six months or so. In over 90% of patients with various vaccine injuries, this prescription proved remarkably effective, or at least achieved a noticeable improvement in a relatively short time. This slide shows our commitment to our fellow human beings. The damage caused by the coronavirus vaccine is a cross-border disaster. Our first experiences with mRNA vaccines in humans have revealed even more problems than the concerns voiced since the start of vaccination.

7:43:51The pathogenesis of vaccine injuries is still largely unknown. The treatment of these conditions is not yet established. We will continue to work to support people with vaccine injuries. Efforts must also be made to find out who is responsible for this enormous disaster. There is also no doubt that Corona pandemic policy has led to human rights violations and to a development of society towards totalitarianism. The fight against such human rights violations is also considered right. We are confident that these activities will be greatly enriched by international cooperation. We would like to contribute to international cooperation by promoting deeper and broader discussions among healthcare professionals.

7:44:50Thank you for your attention!