Alan Watt: Strategies of Global Domination (2010)

Eventually, we won't even have to go through the farce, and that's what it is, of voting in parties or candidates. Because in the latter part of the 20th century, and now into the 21st century, we're being trained, rather obviously, to simply accept rule by experts, rule by scientists, rule by professionals. And that's what they mean when they call government, governance, that's the term used. How do you get a domesticated herd to move from a field, a system in which it's been grazing for 20, 50 years, this kind of system, to this field over here, this new field? Because we have reluctance to change. We like familiarity. We like routine. You see? You do it by various techniques, one of which is revolution.

Most revolutions are bloodless. You have cultural revolutions, sexual revolutions, along with that comes the music revolutions, etc. These literally are designed to alter and direct culture, knowing what kind of culture they'll have at the very end of it, too. They know exactly what kind of culture they want to come out of it. You also can do it through crisis creation. Crisis after crisis has been hit on the people of the world since 9-11 happened. And we must understand that the techniques that are used abroad are also used at home in warfare. And we heard the term shock and awe. Shock and awe on the hard, the hard force level, as they call it, is bombs, all kinds of acoustic equipment to nullify enemies, scare the hell out of them through, voice to your skull and so on.

Which was used in Gulf War 1, which was used in Gulf War 1, and it's all over the British media. But you can also use shock and awe on your domestic people again. You do it by crisis after crisis until the public are so terrified. See, the average person has a sort of confidence that they build up where they think, I can manage most things that come my way. Whatever little crisis in my life, what happens to other people, I can deal with. When all those around you are getting scared at the same time as you because they're losing their jobs, they've been threatened with pandemics, terrorists everywhere, terrifying people to even get on subways, and so on. And all those around you, as I say, are also in the same boat, you tend to be more easily directed by the powers that be that come out and speak with authority and confidence over you.

That's why they give you a guy like Obama, who's trained in oratory. He was trained in oratory, not in truth, but in oratory, the technique of persuasion, shock and awe, as I say, is a technique of making a person and a whole population punch drunk. And each one of those fears, you see, you understand that each person can handle one major crisis in their personal life, maybe two at the same time. It's understood in psychology, and many, many studies, that if you have maybe three to four crises hitting you personally in your life at the same time, you will literally go into an incredible depression, a reactive depression you can't cope. That's understood. Apply that technique on a whole population. The thing is, there's not one of these crises that we've been told about that you personally can do anything about.

What can you do about terrorism, if it really exists all over the place? It's out of your hands, you're helpless. What can you do about a common pandemic? It's out of your hands, you're helpless. What can you do about a nuke getting set off in New York Harbor or wherever? You can't, you're helpless. The message you're getting is that you're utterly helpless to defend, help, or save yourself. That is complete shock and awe tactic that's been used, not only in the US and Canada, but across the world. Same strategy, because we're already global with the global society running us all. Massive psychology and warfare techniques in psychology has been used across the planet to make us succumb to fear and crises, as I say, and none of which we can actually do anything about on an individual level. Therefore, the leaders are presented to us on screen with uniforms or business suits and ties as politicians who speak with confidence, all scripted, of course, and they seem to have everything under control.

You're now basically a fearful slave looking up to the powerful master to defend and protect you. That's the simple technique of it. I've been speaking about the Rockefeller Foundation. I was mentioning the fact that in the United States, the Rockefeller Foundation, which also runs, I think it is the Carnegie Foundation today, maybe even the Ford, they're all combined. The families that are given the intergenerational rights, if you like, or authority to lead the world to amalgamation under global governance. Mr. Rockefeller also is heavily involved in the world depopulation strategies. He funds abortion clinics across the planet. He also funds hundreds of other front foundations that you would think were independent from his. They're actually front foundations.

He funds them all through his money. He can trace them all back again to so-called family planning clinics across the entire globe, especially in the third world countries. It seems that Mr. Rockefeller is intensely worried about overpopulation in the near future from countries which will have no industry, etc. And he sees it as his right to start the decimating process, basically, of depopulation. Last winter, I got an invitation to attend something called the World's Citizenship Council, the annual meeting. That kind of floored me because the head of the World's Citizenship Council is Mr. Rockefeller himself. And here I am speaking out about and against them. So this did not come out of the blue. They try and get you on board working for them.

What was also more startling was they always give members maybe 15 minutes or 20 minutes to speak. And I was offered that to speak on stage to this world meeting. The world's citizenship idea is part of the old idea of Cecil Rhodes up into Lord Milner, to the Royal Institute for International Affairs and the Council on Foreign Relations. Mr. Rockefeller is up on Google in some of his conferences giving out world's citizenship awards to very famous people. So they've already bypassed and have bypassed sovereign nations a long time ago. What other benefits you get from being a world citizen, I'm not certain at all. But he said I'd be allowed to speak at this conference. He did not say what to speak about or he didn't say anything about what not to speak about. And he also said that this chairman, of course, wrote to me, he also said that I'd be allowed to participate in the round table groups which come after.

The round table society is very, very important because the round table societies were set up as far back as the Milner Society and the Rhodes Foundation. They came out with the first round table societies. What they do is take the topics that are discussed at the main meetings. Then they split off at different tables to specialize in certain aspects of the speeches they've heard and find ways how to implement them into reality through media promotion, various methods of propaganda and so on. And I did not attend. I was tempted to go just to see if they would ask me not to speak about certain things. But it was the middle of winter and the journey to this university would have been pretty, pretty hectic anyway.

And I was so busy. But you will be approached. And that's not the first time I've been approached to do this kind of thing. You'll find that some people are bought over. I should go back to Lord Bertrand Russell on this topic because Lord Bertrand Russell said in one of his own books, the same book, in fact, where he talks about those children who managed to escape the indoctrinations, who have intelligence and an ability to communicate to others, must be brought on board. The system, employed by the system, bribed into the system, if possible, that generally works with most people. He said, otherwise, we shall have to eliminate them because they did not want people around who understood an agenda that the general public are unaware of.

They didn't want these people with the ability to communicate information, documented information, in a fashion that people understand out in the community where they could spread this word. That ties in with Mao Tse-tung, who said, he was not afraid of armies. His worst fear was someone with a good idea, a great idea, a unique idea, and the ability to communicate it. So that is how they treat, basically, people with information. First comes invitation to join them. Many people do. As I say, Bertrand Russell backed that up by saying if they can't be brought on board, they must be literally eliminated from the public arena. That's how seriously they take this agenda at the top. They don't mess it around. The reason, I think, they don't simply come out and kill you, straightforward, is they don't have to do a messy job.

There's many ways of killing you, especially in this day and age. But I think, to be honest, they're so arrogant right now at this moment. They're not too worried about the mass of the general population who are indoctrinated and updated with indoctrination daily from television, as one example. About a hundred years ago, this big organization with many branches, they wanted to rule the world, basically, using Britain as a nucleus of a system, an embryo, which also was going to be joined with the U.S. under the Anglo-American establishment, wrote about the kind of culture and the changes of culture over a hundred-year period that they would actually design. We're all tribal to an extent. That's why we even bother to vote for a tribal leader.

This is well understood. That's why we're supplied with these leaders. And because the average man was to become more disengaged from his own destiny as the expert class arose, it was decided that the males would get their outlet, basically, gradually becoming helpless as males through sports. Therefore, they'd have a tribal team they could identify with, they could cheer them on as they were winning. In their own personal lives, they were getting nowhere. They were getting disenfranchised, in a sense, as experts took over decision-making for them in all kinds of fields. So this was psychology at use, planned before they even implemented the sports. When radio came along, of course, they used that to the maximum, sports for the men, radio soaps, basically, for the women. And then in came television, as I say, with its alpha state, its hypnotic state.

It took off. It really, really took off. And men became glued to the sports shows. The big think tanks, and we've had think tanks to do with always planning the future and how they would create societies and even different cultures between, within 100 years, say, from this type of society to that society to the next society, how they'd implement it. Again, always through the youth culture, which is easy to do if you have universal education. You can always mandate the same system, same culture to be taught to the youth. However, as I say, since the 1960s, once television really, really took off, sports used to only come out on Saturdays. And over a 10-year period, it gradually came on every night of the week.

Until today, we have even sports channels. Sports, sports, sports. And you see guys who are sitting home, who are basically powerless at work. They have bosses. They're powerless on the roads. There's police and traffic wardens and cops watching them. They have no means to feel strong. And so they tend to watch sports as a substitute. They project themselves into a game which they never participate in. But as long as their team wins, they feel something's happening in their life that's positive and it's successful. It's a very good substitute for many, many things as far as the elite are concerned. Now, the big think tanks that involved many professional people knew that they'd have to give something for the males and for the women to also give a substitute too, the intention being ultimately to alter society, drastically alter it so much that even the purpose, for instance, of marriage would lose any appeal.

For the females, they gave them high fashion, accessible prices for high fashion clothes. They brought in, people don't realize, they brought in the miniskirt back in the 1920s during Prohibition. They brought in cocaine at the same time, along with the booze, to get young people in. The idea being that if you're doing something illegal, it's very naughty. Youngsters loved to break the rules, get together, we're all being naughty together. And sex and booze, coupled with coke being smuggled in at that time, had its desired effects, but not quite the way it was designed to have by those that planned that culture, the Bernays types. And Bernays was heavily involved in this. So they came out, as I say, with not sex and rock and roll, but sex in a form of jazz.

The Charleston dance came in, the miniskirt came in, sex became rather rampant for the first time. All the old traditional taboos were broken with one generation. But there was fallout to this change, this massive change in culture. The fallout being that they did not have the antibiotics to treat all the sexually transmitted disease that came along. Secondly, they didn't have the legal abortion clinics to take care of the unwanted children. Children that also were produced by hyper-promiscuity. They opened up big orphanages to try and take care of this. The boys' towns, they had ones for girls too. But there was so much backlash, especially in the United States, from the old Christian communities, that they had to tone it all down.

It kind of flopped, as I say. Sexually transmitted disease became rampant. So did unwanted pregnancies and abortions. And so they went back to the drawing board. Because remember, before this all happened, the big players, the new high priesthood, we'll call them, of the time lords, those who create the future, work in think tanks for the big establishment, had a definite mandate. The only problem was how do you achieve that mandate over a time period. So they went back to the drawing board. And they've always known, for instance, that wartime, in wartime, more children are produced because people, young people, who might go off to die tomorrow tend to be far more promiscuous. They brought this back after World War II big time.

And we're turning it steadily. All our tax money went into one particular area of research, not just for the atomic weaponry and so on. It went into finding ways of finding a contraceptive that was effective. When they found it and launched it on the scene, at the same time as it launched what they called pop music, along with drugs, LSD and so on, they brought it a contraceptive. So then permission was given, in a sense, and promoted from the top down, even from the BBC, which is, remember, the BBC is owned by the British government. It's an arm of the British government. It talks on behalf of the dominant minority who rule Britain. So they began to promote all this stuff. All the DJs they'd bring on television would interview the top pop stars of the day. They were all stoned at their minds.

Some of them were falling out of chairs. And the interviewers would say, Tee hee, aren't we naughty children? All aimed at a young generation to emulate. This is what we do. Monkey see, monkey do. Once again, remember, the prime intent was to break the old culture of boy meets girl, going together for a while, getting engaged, getting married, having children. The family unit, they'd said, when they had the League of Nations, which was the precursor of the United Nations, said they'd have to destroy the family unit. And pretty well all of H.G. Wells' non-fiction books promotes all of this agenda. And in fact, he coined the term in the late 1800s. This is how far back this agenda of promiscuity had to go. He coined the term free love.

And in one of his books, written before 1890, he says, we must promote free love in order to destroy and end the obsolete family unit. Once that's done, he said, the family is no longer in the way when government comes for an individual. Each individual will be solely responsible to the government itself. And no family will stand up around them like a primitive tribe and defend them. At the same time, the foundations within the United States and Britain and elsewhere were funding what appeared to be far-left groups, communist groups. So much so, as I say, the Reece Commission went in to look into this from the 50s to find out why top capitalists who owned international corporations and banks, international banks, were putting up foundations to fund far-left groups.

What we know now, it was to literally destroy the old culture in order to bring in the new culture, the new society. So, therefore, you have the proliferation of sexual activity. The fallout still came from unwanted pregnancies, far reduced than it had before because of contraception. But then came the lead of the feminist charge, again funded by the Rockefeller Foundation in the States, to spearhead and demonstrate and demand the rights for abortion. If they could get the public to devalue human life, and that's in the writings of Julian Huxley. He says, if we can get society to devalue human life, he says, and take humanity off its pedestal as a supreme being on the planet, then, he said, we can bring in our controlled society with a workable population. Everything works within culture towards an agenda.

And as Plato said, so long ago, over 2,300 years ago, he said, culture and cultural changes must be authorized from the top. If it's grassroots, truly grassroots, then it's outside of the elite's control, and ripple effects could occur, and it could spread anywhere. They couldn't control it, contain it anymore. Therefore, the major changes in culture, which Plato said came through drama and the emulation of actors, actresses, including fashions that they wore, and the music they heard had to be strictly regulated and authorized from the top. The whole science of this, which was always a science, and understood by those in those businesses, was used to the maximum to literally alter, drastically alter culture so radically in the 60s and 70s that they could never return to a past way of living.

We tie that in with another big player, Lord Bertrand Russell, who had experimental schools under royal charter, where he could do things that anyone else would be locked up for doing. He said in his own schools, and there were mixed schools, he said that if he could encourage pre-pubertal sexuality amongst the children, and encourage multiple partners from before puberty, he says the chances, because of study and observation, the chances of them ever bonding with one person for the rest of their life was pretty well obsolete, null and void, wouldn't happen. Therefore, that technique all came into play during the 60s. It was called free love. Drugs helped it along the way. And that was the beginning of what we saw, as short-term relationships, divorces became more and more common.

Interestingly enough, divorces really took off, not because society demanded it, or it came from a need or demand from the people. Divorces took off because the Hollywood stars, and remember, too, the drama industry, the entertainment industry, have always said this, the people follow the stars. And they're the guiding stars in the so-called occult, you see. We tend to worship wealth and people and famous people. We want to be like them. We want to identify with them. The whole idea of divorces came out from Hollywood, the top stars leading the charge for this. Women started to talk about it, who was getting divorced with actors from what guy and so on. And gradually, it put the idea across to them that, well, if they're getting divorced, then maybe so should I.

At the same time, the Bernays techniques were used through all kinds of magazines. At that time, 97% of all magazine publications were aimed at women. Because advertisers have said, and it's still taught in marketing schools today, women are far more easy to get to go along with something new than males are. So within all these magazines and write-ups about their famous actresses, their heroines and so on, the rich ones, the average women were reading these stories and identifying with them. They were being told that you can do anything, you can have it all. You could have a career, you can have a family, you had a home. They gave them utter lies, and they coined the term superwomen. So across the whole of Europe and the States and Canada, at the same time, always coordinated at the same time, the media entertainment industry were pushed promoting stories of superwomen.

And they'd find someone, real or imaginary, we'll never know, who supposedly was a CEO of a company, who had all these children at home, had a great husband, could manage everything, and could cook great cuisine, blah, blah. And that, of course, is a fantasy. This put pressure again on most women to try and live up to the fantasy, as all advertising does. And most of the stuff we're getting is advertising, or at the very least, is basic psychological manipulation. Bernays' techniques again, remembering too that he called it the creation of a consumerist society. Well-behaved people, as long as there's money going around, they would go into the material world, and they would forgo having children. That's the same thing as Charles Galton Darwin talks about.

If we can encourage the women and the male to go after the material benefits of the world, there's a slimmer chance they'll actually have children, who tend to be economically burdensome. People were addicted to television in a very short space of time. Most people still today think that all entertainment to do with movies, drama, is there for nothing more than their entertainment. It never, ever was that case. The greatest social messages are promoted through movies and drama, high drama, through the fixation of emotive sequences, emotional sequences, not logical, factual sequences, but pushing points across in an emotional way which register and fix in the mind. So emotional content is very, very important rather than going through an actual discussion or an argument using logic and facts.

There's no debates. And when you're being downloaded through fiction, your guard is down. The censor part of your brain is not in action as you would in a debate or a lecture. You're actually in an alpha state being completely downloaded with new ideas. Very similar to a computer. And so therefore, a culture industry which is called by its own the culture industry. The Soviet Union had a department called the culture industry. Their actors and directors were called the cultural leaders. All you have to do is keep giving them new updates every so often and you can change an entire country or a nation or a block of nations who are all getting the same uploads, upgrades at the same time along certain paths.

Today we call it political correctness. Most people want to belong to their peer group. They want to be the same as everyone else when it comes to opinions. In fact, they judge their own personal sanity by bouncing ideas off their neighbours and friends who will answer back and agree on these same topics in kind. It doesn't matter if the topics or what you're given are facts or utter nonsense as long as everyone agrees at the same time you'll say, well, I'm sane and your friends will all agree because they've had the same information given to them. We don't only get the same information given to us. We're led through sequences, even documentaries to leave you with a predetermined fixed conclusion on any given topic.

Most folk are once again unaware of this. They think I've just been given all the facts on this topic and this is the obvious conclusion which is always given to you by the final experts on the particular programme. There's no thinking involved. We tie this in with Brzezinski. Brzezinski said in two ages, now this guy was way up with the NSA. He's a master geopolitician. He works, he admits he works in 20, 50 year periods to do with geopolitics in other countries but he said himself the public will shortly be unable to think or reason for themselves. He says it was meaning by the form of information that was given to them, the type, the formulas that were in use then in the 1970s and eventually he said they will expect the media to do all their thinking and reasoning for them.

Well, that's happened today. That's why people today can't think outside of the programming from television. Give an instance in fact of why TV was so important to show you that it was so important to have it in the homes of ordinary people. Now, most countries in Europe for instance up into the 1950s and 60s and I'll give an example is Britain. The working class people did not have credit cards. You could not get a credit card. You couldn't get a bank loan without collateral to put something up against it. So therefore you were at pretty well a fixed income. There was no extra cash outside of rent, food and so on, clothes for the children, essentials. There was no extras for luxuries. There was no credit given to them.

Yet the British government just like the Chinese government did two years ago made a mandate that every household in Britain must get a television set. And what they did they made one exception out of all the things that the people could need really needed. They made one exception. They allowed credit companies to come into being. They could go around the houses every week and collect half a crown or five shillings or whatever it was and pay off a used television set. The British government made a deal with the United States of America to buy and used televisions which were then reconditioned to be sold to the working class all across Britain. As I say they wanted a TV in every home. Now since when is government interested in how happy you are at home?

There's another reason for this and sure enough the working classes all got these DER DER was a company that brought them all into Britain and the guys came around every weekend collecting their half-crown and five shillings and suddenly this and I can remember where I was it was one of the last areas really to get television a real working class area I can remember at this high being taken by my parents to the local park on a weekend and passing dozens and dozens and dozens of other couples on the way with their toddlers as well. When you got to the park which was a valley there were over maybe a thousand a thousand and a half couples along the grass in the valley and that's where everything was discussed local politics national politics labor unions to do with their mining and so on and everyone mingled with everyone else old school friends and so on that system had been going on for hundreds of years hundreds of years where people communicated thoughts real feelings real things that really mattered to them and their communities to each other conversation when the TV came in and I was still about this high within about a month I could go down that park every weekend and no one I mean no one was there it literally overnight killed off the socialization and interaction between people and tradition again with exchanged viewpoints give each other news helped each other out who was sick who was this who was that everyone helped each other out and from

then on you could pass rows and rows and rows and they were called row houses all joined together and all you saw at night was the flickering of that bluish light in the windows and that was the end that was the end of real communities it happened within a matter of about a month the flicker rate on the television is very very important it was timed to be so many cycles per second and it actually just meets with the brain patterns from alpha state when our brain sees it through our eyes we start to adopt that flicker rate in our mind and we go into deep alpha state watch children and watch their mouths they drop open they won't hear their parents talking they're hypnotized in the fights why would they give that particular flicker rate when they could have chosen a whole variety of flicker rates it wasn't an essential thing to have so it was done for a purpose it was meant to be hypnotic it was meant to be used as a tool of propaganda and indoctrination even through the guise of entertainment and so on it also was to create a new society because they were the avant-garde as I say leading the sexual revolution through drama through little documentaries fiction non-fiction all combined once again back to Plato the audience see what they see you understand that it's even worked out towards different age groups there's something on for everybody everybody's age group each age group is actually being updated as well even the elderly ones into new ways of thinking or seeing things but

the target mainly was for youngsters if we take one of the world's experts on propaganda who is Jacques Ellul who wrote extensively on how the mind works and how all entertainment he said that has to do with government programs such as police detective stories detective series which contain little human dramas as the hook that you identify with to make you watch the whole story child gets kidnapped detective goes on a hunt he goes through hell and war and fire to get that child back you identify with the hero if you're a male you identify with the heroine if you're female and that's the hook to get you to watch them but what he said was all dramas to do with police or even the military in movies are pure propaganda pure propaganda the human story is just the bait to make you watch through it to get you to identify with it because once again there's always a message left somewhere in the movie it might even be a message that's against your own morality it could be where the cop for instance does sleep with this beautiful woman while his wife was at home and it's all part of the story and even tell you why he did this he was feeling down that day blah blah blah and so you've just again altered your viewpoints on how you yourself might behave in that situation and sometimes that can nothing can be justified that's how you're downloaded through entertainment it's there to alter and direct and always upgrade into another

step of the direction that the entire culture for someone else's purpose let's talk about the effects of the alpha state first of all recent articles I've even read on the air from various science studies show you that even when you switch off television you remain in that alpha state for maybe 45 minutes to an hour sometimes longer depending on how long you've been watching it with high definition again why would a president of a country mandate that all TVs had to go high definition is it because he really cares so much about your happiness he wants better quality for you also another reason for it well I'm sure the effects of the old flicker rates and what it did will also be incorporated in high definition but with even more added benefits for bringing you into a complete hypnotic state how do you wake someone up who's addicted to television you can't very very simple you can't get your daily brainwashing where literally it's bypassing any consciousness in the person you can't take that every day and still try to wake up and learn at the same time I've known people who've gone through complete withdrawal from television and gone into depressions because their entire routine is broken they also have time on their hands which is a big aspect of control remember too if you can take time away from a person who can think for themselves who might say I'll go and read a book I'll go and study something or if you can take that time away from them and

have them mesmerized in front of a television set then you'll keep them dumb stupid compliance and going along with the system I always advise to people if you know someone who's watching TV it's quite simple to find out where they are mentally psychologically in the understanding of things you can ask them a few simple questions if they give you standard television answers forget it simple as that forget it if you see some spark of their own opinion coming in there's maybe a chance you can do something with them but you cannot get out you see television can be classified as a drug any addiction is still an addiction television is an addiction people watch four or five hours per day top psychologists and even the United Nations have talked about the use of television for creating the new culture for children how many people know that all government agencies or departments all governments in the world basically have departments of culture which hire cartoonists and pay their expenses to do cartoons always incorporating the latest political correct story to do with environment waste bad adults and how they've destroyed the planet through their consuming etc how many people realize as you plonk your children down in front of it to babysit them that they're actually being brainwashed scientifically and these cartoons were designed by experts to get their message across to those children implanted in their young minds fixed in their young minds forever for the rest of

their lives ongoing daily and even right down to the novels that you read to children that are designed for children too which will incorporate all of this all paid by government grants to authors and writers you literally have to take it into your own hands it's one of the most dangerous tools that can be used it's also dangerous to the extent that why do you think government licenses TV stations if you were an independent producer TV station who came out with this kind of information you would not get a license you'd have to be authorized and politically correct with a whole bunch of things to do and not to do written out before you'd be given a license and you'd be checked on every so often to make sure you were following those topics that you're allowed to if you want to advise people on television and you can do this with yourself how to train yourself how to watch television if you never get involved you understand a storyline you watch a movie but don't get involved and as I say there's always a thread or a hook for you to follow a plot whatever the chase the guy always ends up with the beautiful woman at the end after going through hell to rescue a child or whatever it happens to be or save the world if you can stop yourself from getting lost in the emotional part of it and study the movie as you're watching it you'll learn the techniques there have been implanted in the movie itself that's a great way to learn if you can do it with

yourself you can also show other people how to do this to actually study everything as it's been presented to you and eventually what you'll find is that when you're watching even documentaries you'll see how the documentaries themselves are shaped to give you the opinions often very strong opinions without giving you specific facts or giving you distorted facts etc learn how to critically analyze and think as you're watching and if you can show others this technique a good example is sit down with someone who regularly watches a good movie one that you've previously watched and then point out all the politically correct little inserted words slogans phrases that have been put in there and show them show them how it's been done that way it can actually be fun to study television and write down all the different things that they've missed but it's all implanted subconsciously in their mind because those implants those subconscious implants will become their opinions and they will never know how they arrived at them they won't remember it's from this particular documentary this particular movie or whatever so that can also be fun that's a positive side of it you can train anyone to do this with the internet the first person to mention it that I know of at least to the public was again this master Brzezinski in his book Between Two Ages in the early 70s he said shortly a system will be given to the public of mass communication which

will cause a revolution the revolutionary thing to change society but he also mentioned and hinted at the fact that there would be regulation behind it he mentioned too that those who brought it in would never lose control the main control over the internet because after all knowledge is power knowledge has always been power that's why all down through the ages the real machinations of government are never told to the public real power comes from understanding and having all the facts on any particular topic so therefore the internet was to be given to the general public with other intentions initially it was to get them all into it now what did the elite want to achieve what was their point of view they wanted people to become so used to the internet they couldn't do without it now we see businesses really can't do without it they can't imagine going back to pencil and paper and taking inventory and all this kind of stuff for the youngsters who must be the generation they target they made sure that every that's the only thing I knew about the internet from the media I was completely ignorant about it and computers the only thing I knew was there was lots of pornography on it every paper kept telling you about it which again is the same old technique they used in the 60s and 70s aren't we naughty wink wink for the rock stars on television knowing all the youngsters would get into it when their hormones are high that's all they're thinking about

but once people were addicted to it they also also planned to gradually alter it keeping the people addicted to it as they changed it into another system where mainstream media the authorized media the culture creation industry media would eventually have prime or the main dibs the first grabs at the main bandwidth that eventually they're claiming will have to be reduced

for the general public to use a medium to communicate to each other alternate news verified facts to each other as we have at the moment that eventually supposedly is going to be policed they've had international meetings the first one held in Canada under the guise of the United Nations or the auspices of the United Nations to do with regulating and censorship of the internet they have these meetings every year as they add more laws to it we know the cloud system is to come in eventually it's been all over the media in Britain where you won't be able to store anything on a hard drive you won't even need a hard drive eventually remote servers will have all your information for you it will then be used as a form of punishment if you were politically incorrect in some form or another then you'll be cut off from accessing that server with all your data until you toe the line and behave yourself social control can be used through money monetary penalizations or through other penalizations like withdrawing you access from it it definitely will be used for social control again unless there's a backlash from the general public and they do expect backlashes from people who have become used to looking into whatever site they wish to look at or communicating whatever kind of information they want to to each other now along with introduction of the internet we've got to remember too the government agencies also set up and promoted chat rooms and all the rest of it and there

are agents within this strange nether region called the internet whose job is to infiltrate people who are coming together as groups communicating on specific topics to do with political changes and disrupting those groups so already it's a battlefield and they called it the cyber wars long before they even gave this internet to the people there have been informational war they said in all the papers therefore government intelligence agencies would have to expand their roles with mandates to also be in this invisible world where they would manipulate various groups from within as well there's also a lot of nonsense of course on the internet too which can take you down conspiracy paths I hate the term conspiracy because the government wants us to use it like we're some sort of hobbyists and some sort of kooks I don't use the term but that's become the most popular type of site now is conspiracy site and there's many out there there's professional agents out there as well who've been funded by governments and even launched by governments to be well known especially in Europe to lead the conspiracy sites then they bring in the UFOs the aliens until you have achieved your goal counterintelligence let's talk about counterintelligence and how it works what is intelligence intelligence gathering is sending agents out to simply listen to listen in marketplaces bars cafes as to what the people are discussing Lawrence of Arabia in his

own book Seven Pillars of Wisdom was trained as an agent he was trained in Aramaic Arabic languages he was given lots of money he and 11 other people trained from Cambridge and sent and sent over to the Arabic countries to start up Arabic newspapers once they started putting stories in the newspapers they went round the marketplaces they hired lots of guys to listen to gossip to see if the intelligence they were putting out in the papers was being discussed by the recipients the readers that's basic intelligence gathering what is counterintelligence counterintelligence from a government's perspective is taking information and data that could be crucially it could be bad for the ruling regime and finding ways to counter that knowledge counter it what you do standard wise if you can't defame the person who's bringing out a truth or kill them is to bring out your own heroes launch them well finance them well into the same area saying the same stuff that others are talking about it's called intelligence giving out facts and once they have the following then they start bringing in aliens and UFOs and they bring in the new age the whole new age religion into it spirituality is the big term they're using today until a newcomer a skeptic will hear this stuff from the who's very good who gives the same data as the person who doesn't go into the UFOs and so on but the guy who doesn't go into the UFOs aliens reptilians and all the

rest of it suddenly is thrown out with the other guy you're classified with them by association your topics are associated even though you stay clear of the fantasy stuff the disinformation you'll be lumped along with them and then you've countered the intelligence when you when you mention the facts people laugh at you say oh you probably believe that the aliens are running the world now and that's it that's counter intelligence and that is also all over the internet and it's paid for by again government psyops operations some groups that I've found are doing really good work where people decide to get together physically and they will choose a book to read to do with the factual data that's available to the public that can be proven oh Henry Kissinger and they'll go through it they'll analyze the book they'll analyze the phrases they'll analyze the contents they start to participate in what they're reading because others will remember this particular era this time when this event happened can add to the thing and so on that's participation that's communication and other information as I say from those involved who live through things can be added to the whole thing giving you a much more complete picture so it's a good idea to take to start this kind of thing off in your local area even if there's only two of you that started off don't sit and laugh it's kind of comical at first when you say well we discussed this book you've

never done anything unless in your lifetime sit down and get yourself a coffee or a beer or whatever you need and take turns at reading and ask the other guy do you have anything to add what I've just read do you have any insights into what do you think of this it gets you stimulated into participating and really thinking because everybody who's alive today has been trained literally not to have to think as Brzezinski said shortly the public will be unable to reason or think for themselves they'll expect the media to do the reasoning for them so let's counter that let's get back to thinking for ourselves using the data material get involved start using our minds again and you'll be surprised it's like a muscle you haven't used for a long time how quickly you start to use it how sharp you become so quickly and you can get larger groups and larger groups together doing the same thing and then you can branch them together communicate together then they suggest other books you haven't heard of maybe you need a particular book for evidence I have stacks of them at home everyone has access somewhere to some material that got stuck away and when you start putting all of this material together mainly through as I say discussion and reading groups you can add to the knowledge the more knowledge and facts actual factual data you can put together the bigger your arsenal is and the easier it becomes to show people and convince them look this is authenticated

stuff here's the factual data here's the physical book read from that book and then have your discussions what do you think about this what do you think they meant by this what do you think has happened have they fulfilled this part of an agenda and most people will say yeah they have well here's how they did it the evidence is all there but knowledge remember is scattered that's also why since the 70s and so on televisions were put up in places where people used to communicate to each other bars and restaurants but the pubs of Europe everyone talked and discussed everything the televisions were all put in for a reason and now everyone's mesmerized and you can hear sports or loud music you can't communicate anymore that was government promoters because the government licensed the big chains of taverns and pubs all throughout Europe and so what you've got really is deliberate attempts nothing happens for no reason why the customers weren't demanded they were bored in bars as they discussed topics people would just move around the pub talking and listening to the conversations and they join in the one that he likes why was it so important to destroy communication it's because it's a main propaganda tool that stops communication between people even in a room if you notice too they don't even discuss the topics once the news is read to them to each other they've both been downloaded with their opinions you don't have to have

to ask what their opinion is it's going to be the same one as you've been downloaded with left by the expert so we've got to get back to communications and communicating with each other and finding the evidence knowledge is scattered knowledge is power so it's scattered all over the place and thousands of books but when you can start these reading classes up and get other reading classes communicating with you even through the internet you can start putting the data the factual data together and so that you can present it to the public and bring in more and more members only knowledge and the will to use this knowledge is going to thwart the plans that have openly been made for us and declared from the elites at the top the whole problem of being involved in a community became a double-edged sword we know for instance that communitarianism is a term used first by Bush Senior talking about the collectivist society coming in the United Nations has us all split up into communities it's promoted through local TV even Sudbury here has your community this is your local community be involved in your community they're talking about a politically correct community that's the problem government really penetrated and altered and distorted and changed society through communities not just with television which has certainly destroyed the community spirit the intent of government. This is how abusers work too.

Abusers work with the same technique because they want power over a victim. The abuser will come in and take care initially of problems of the abused, often the problems are the very outcome of what the abusers have been doing to the victims in the first place. Governments came in with welfare, for instance, a long time ago, in all countries about the same time. At one time families helped each other out. You didn't need welfare. If someone lost their job, everyone chipped in. You didn't condemn the family member for being unemployed or ill or whatever or losing their job. Families helped each other. Now the family remember is still really the smallest nucleus of a tribe, and then government came in with unemployment insurance, which they took off you, but nothing was for free.

And gradually over time, when people became unemployed or even sick for a while and couldn't work, I heard people even say to their own relatives, "Well, go to welfare, that's what they're for, there are social agencies to deal with this." Until today we're in a sad state where even close relatives won't help each other out. They expect the government, the abuser, the government is the abuser, they expect the government to take care of all financial problems for the unfortunate victims, and they stop helping each other out. We've got to start reclaiming the rights to, and you can do it personally with people you know, to help other people out and start countering the government's mandate, because the government's mandate is for control over the victims, not to help the victims. Those who fall under under that particular level into the welfare state have their lives run by government agencies and social workers. That's what Huxley says. He says that they won't need their survival capabilities. Russell said the same thing, because the government is taking care and making all their decisions for them in order to help you. It's really to take you over and have you obeying them and their system. That's what you're up against: a planned war strategy, making them dependent upon government services, not their family units, not their brothers and sisters, their fathers and mothers, but on the state itself. We're going to counter that and

become involved again in the lives of those around us and have our own true communities. It doesn't matter if there's only five of you in a community, even if you live in a town or a city, that's your own little community. We all have something in common. What it really is, is gaining knowledge for your own and others' self-preservation and survival into the future. These video interviews have all been exclusive and they're going to be archived at prisonplanet.tv. Please download them, burn them to disk and give them to everyone you know, upload them to YouTube. This information is vital, not just to our free republic but to the future of free humanity. And now, part 2 of our in-depth interview with New World Order researcher Alan Watt.

I'm Alan Watt and I'm an author and researcher into geopolitics really and history. I follow where the world has been, the techniques that were used to bring them to those stages, and I plot them to where we are today and where, how the future is planned. I've researched so many books, I've got a library of my own. I like paperback books or rich hardback books because they're permanent records of the past, and if you can't understand the past, you can't understand the present or the future. I've also been in the music business, heavily involved for years, and I saw how culture creation worked from the top and how generations were swayed into new fashions, new ideas. I've been following the histories of what's now called the New World Order for many, many years, and I tried to go into the books written by the big players, the technocrats themselves, those famous people like the Kissingers, the Brzezinskis and so on, the Huxleys, the Lord Bertrand Russells, who all worked for the same organisations, and I came to the conclusion, really, there was only one big organisation with many subcategories.

These boys tend to publish the world that they saw coming into view, and they wrote it in their own hand, basically. They told us where they were taking the world, and when you start studying these things about the age of 14, 15 or even younger and reading their books, and you live long enough, you will see that the world has turned out exactly as they planned. This can't be coincidence, and who can really write up a wish list and make it happen globally unless there is an organisation, very, very powerful, probably the only organisation really on the planet, an organisation that can fund all sides, all oppositions, and using the synthesis of conflicting parties, they can literally make the world come into view as they planned. They plan in centuries, and the astonishing thing is, when you go into the United Nations, which was loosely based on the Soviet system, they plan certain parts of their agenda in 50-year plans, some in 100-year plans, and some even in 150-year plans for different aspects of it. The Russells, the Huxleys and so on, Brzezinskis also use the same terminology with their long-term plans, and you've got to understand too that nothing in culture comes out from the grassroots.

Even Plato talked about that thousands of years ago. He said that if it was a grassroots movement really coming from the people, then those in charge, the dominant minority, would lose control. Therefore every change in culture, right down to fashion and music, this was written 2,300 years ago, had to be authorised from the top and promoted from the top if it fitted with the continuance of control over the public. And these are sciences which were taught down through the ages, they're still taught today to the big players, and they've used it to the full in the 20th century, now into the 21st century, with the use of television, mass communications, radio, etc. Everything has been given to us for the appropriate time and stage in the actual planning, and for those who are coming into this kind of study, it's best to go into the books, as I say, written by the big players themselves. They love to boast. Kissinger's got lots of books out there, so has Brzezinski. These are probably two of the master players in geopolitics. Try to stay away from all the conspiracy books, they're also put out there on purpose, very fascinating books, but they'll lead you in circles forever without giving you the overall picture, to the fact that every generation has a purpose up until this present time, and in a post-industrial era, these big boys have decided, and their masters too, that we are simply superfluous and they no longer need

us. Hence we have big foundations coming forward and organizations like the Optimum Population Trust, who have decided to come out openly and demand that government start radically reducing the populations. We are now the useless eaters, as Lord Bertrand Russell called us. Our ideas, our opinions on everything, our world view, even to do with population and the fake view that we're overpopulated, is all projected to us by the mainstream media working in concert for their masters, and we begin to parrot what we hear through repetition, and that's so important, it's repetition with slogans and catchphrases, and once you hear it happening in your own local group, your milieu, then you know it's working. And the camera can make anything appear to be true. You'll see that in India, for instance, they always use the same streets of Bombay to make you think that you're massively overcrowded, and that's the impression people think of the entire Indian continent. The Indian continent is huge with thousands and thousands of miles of forest where no one lives. It's the same in Africa too. China, being the model state for the world for instance, put into effect the United Nations policy to the extreme with its population reduction and the movements of people off of the rural areas into cities. They said that years ago.

Right now they're in the process of moving 200 million more people off into the major cities, and that's the major newspapers. The cities appear to be crowded because everyone's being moved into them. In the western world, since the 1950s again under the term of urban sprawl and stopping urban sprawl, the western countries also signed agreements to do no more building in the outskirts of the major cities. All existing buildings have to be used or else not done, replaced with even higher ones. But regardless, with the immigration and the free flow of people now from third world countries, the western countries appear to be overcrowded, and yet the UN's own statistics show, and so the national census show, that the Europeans, for instance Canadians and Americans, who have been here for a couple of hundred years, are actually in decline. So the overpopulation problem is simply an image projected by the media as more and more people are crammed into the same cities, and they bring more immigrants in to fill them. But I also realized the system of schooling when I was going to school was bogus, the histories were bogus, and I was very, very lucky to have access to very old libraries, very old libraries, town libraries.

Some of them had reference books going back into the 1700s, written at the time. When you compared the histories I was being taught in school to the histories that were written at the time, they were completely different. You had a deeper understanding of how geopolitics had been used in the past to even populate the country of Canada. London couldn't get immigrants to go off into the new colonies. What they did for Australia was to create so many laws that you couldn't help but break them, and poverty, and therefore stealing a loaf of bread to feed you or your family would get you deported to Australia with your family. That's how they populated Australia: crime. They created the laws for crime. With Scotland, they had a rebellion which could have been rigged, and I often think it was, and the whole of Scotland was punished, and they deported millions of the Scots off to the Americas to populate the Americas. This is geopolitics in action, that's how it works, and whole peoples are often moved from their land because the elite masters want them elsewhere to be productive for them themselves, the masters.

When you look at the strategy for the US and Canada, again long-term strategy, long- term planning, you'll find that the big corporations of their day, the Hudson's Bay companies, the Fraser companies, were given charters to own the land before Canada was Canada or US was the US. They were simply called the Americas. These were private international corporations that had the power of life and death over everyone who lived within their areas. The Queen or the King had a consulate in every country, Lieutenant General or Governor General. We still have one in Canada today who represents the Queen. They have all the powers over life and death of subjects under that Governor. How these stopped rebellion in the past was to give us an idea of what they called democracy. They knew from the Chartist movement in Britain, for instance, and elsewhere, other countries, people were demanding rights for the first time, and so once again they gave us champions to speak on our behalf, which calmed the people down, thinking for the first time in history the people were involved in their own destiny creation, and nothing was further from the truth, because the planners knew that once you bring people into a country or a continent, create real wealth for them and get businesses going, clear the land, drain the swamps and so on, they can take it all away from you through laws 200 years down the road, and that's what's happening now.

Long-term geopolitics once more, and if you think I'm kidding about this, go into the history books written at the time, they're still there in some of the libraries, and you can also go into the art of geopolitics. There's even videos on YouTube on Brzezinski boasting about how he set up the Taliban in Afghanistan. You'll see him encourage them to fight the Soviets at that time in the 1970s, and he actually says, "Yours is a holy war." This man, who obviously believes in nothing but himself and his own peer group, is encouraging another people to go and fight a holy war, a jihad, and he uses these terms against the Soviets, knowing full well once it was set up and was backed by the CIA that 10-15 years down the road they'd be a problem, and then they'd have to go to war with the very group they'd created to fight the Soviets. That's what's happening today. Long-term strategies, well, that's how history has always been run.

If you can go into the books where you find the British Home Office, as mentioned, study the history of the diplomatic corps, because the diplomats were spies. They would go into territories, set up embassies, collect intelligence data for future invasions. Their job was also to try and grab the rights of minerals, gold, silver, etc. across the planet, all natural resources, and find ways, long-term strategy, to either bribe it off the present rulers of those countries or else create an ultimate war with them and simply steal it under the guise of occupation. We're living through a stage today, as I say, where this is all coming to a culmination. This is the post-industrial era, we're post-technical almost in the west, it's all done in other countries, all the technical stuff, and Brzezinski himself talks about the technocratic era where the future will be for an elite with a highly trained bureaucracy underneath them and scientific elite who will not need the human labour that they've needed in the past.

Human labour that is excessive and is unemployed and is hungry is now a threat to that established elite, so now they're doing something which they can only do to the human species. They don't need to do this with animals, with animals just go out and hunt them and kill them. We're the only species that has to be convinced to allow ourselves for the good of all to be sterilised and bring down the population through abortion on one end and euthanasia on the other, under the guise to save the planet. And unfortunately, with the massive propaganda campaigns that are all over media and every country at the same time, with all the big foundations backing them with unlimited financing, remember the two, the foundations are owned by the international bankers themselves, then they can pull all of this off, and unfortunately it really is working in kindergarten now. You walk into a kindergarten anywhere in Europe or Americas and you'll see the rainbow inside every single one of them. You'll see all the terms about the world, here's the globe, we're all global, and you'll see the greeting messages everywhere, everywhere, and how sacrifice will have to be made to save the world and the planet and future generations of society sacrifice you tie that together with the institutions that were comprised of the Fabian Society it was a member of the Royal Institute for International Affairs as one society that comes from foreign relations is also the

same thing as the Royal Institute for International Affairs they are what Thatcher and Professor Carroll Quigley called the parallel government they have told us what the future is going to be some of their members have even written books about the need to cull off massive amounts of the population by any means possible and so we see this final stage being pushed as they convince us that we are the problem the Club of Rome that also belongs to the same group in the 1990s the two founders said that back in the 1970s at the Club of Rome they were given the task as a premier think tank for the globe this global society the task to find ways of reducing the population and controlling the people to go along with this convincing the public how to go along with it and they said they looked at all possible means of doing so what had worked before again geopolitics strategy under warfare conditions the public will give up freedom the public will be directed by governments bureaucracies and police military etc under warfare the public sacrifice they'll have less food they'll ration stuff they go along with it to save themselves therefore they'd have to find a warfare strategy a reason for war and what they came up with was that man was the enemy of the planet they said that the idea that global warming could be created and blamed upon mankind would fit the bill these are the words they used that would fit the bill

written in the 1970s and decided at the think tanks then and published by the guys involved in a book called The First Global Revolution well worth reading when they hit upon an idea from a premier think tank they will never change that agenda I've said before it wouldn't matter if we're up to our eyes in snow all year round they will still stick to global warming that's the agenda now of course they've changed it slightly to climate change which simply means changes in the weather and they're in the process now of convincing the general public to be afraid of summer for instance it's all done through the alteration and distortion of perceptions massive psychology is used on all of this and they certainly understand mass psychology of the general public these boys don't simply announce things or make up a wish list of the future and send up the chimney to Santa Claus when they come up with an idea they implement it I've followed the United Nations Department of Statistics as they announce every single year the sperm count of the Western male which has been falling drastically since the 1950s they say that it's down by about 75-85% now when something like that's happened across the whole of Europe and the Americas in 50 years and they suddenly started noticing it 50 years ago at sudden onset and there's no crisis made about it there's no there's no come back after announcing the statistics they just tell you the cold hard statistics and go off to

the next statistic on some other topic that means it's part of the agenda otherwise it would be a crisis if this wasn't planned then park the agenda believe you me it would be a crisis if they didn't authorize it and now they tell us that the average American has less than 20% sperm and only about 15% is motile that's not a coincidence what happened in the 1950s to start out this ball rolling in the 1950s they suddenly put all the known

female synthetic estrogens into food supply they put it in baby food Procter and Gamble were the first one to admit after investigation 40 years later that they were using a rinse to supposedly sterilize the baby bottles and it contained bisphenol A an odd thing to rinse baby bottles with when bisphenol A is the very thing that attacks young male children at that age and stops the testes from developing properly you go back even further into more detail and you find out that the cosmetic industry we're using insufflatants insufflation is a technique where certain carriers are put into the creams themselves and these creams then absorb into the skin carrying other chemicals with them they're almost like they carry the payloads into the target in the bloodstream we find that the women were highly toxic with the artificial bisphenol A and other ingredients and therefore within the first 8 to 12 weeks of pregnancy with a male child there's a very good chance that male would grow up to be either almost completely sterile or as I say maybe have some motile sperm this was all understood 50 years ago bisphenol A for instance was discovered in the 1890s and the properties it had against humans especially males was known then too now it's in all the beer cans great target males again they line the cans with it there's been many exposés on it now the CBC in Canada which is a government owned television station it's

the BBC basically of Canada did a documentary series called The Disappearing Male and it goes through all of that in that particular talk with proof also if I go back to the writings of Lord Bertrand Russell and Julian Huxley and Aldous Huxley who were also related to the Darwins by the way you'll find that they talked about ways to sterilize the populations in the 30s 40s in the 50s but of course and they even said they would use the needle to create a compliance pliable population meaning to dumb down the people and also to bring down the fertility rates in the 1950s across Europe and the Americas what came out under vast promotion what came out the polio vaccine came out that was the first one ever to come out through a mass fear campaign a massive fear campaign polio was very very rare yet if you go back to the old Pathé black and white newsreels that they showed all over the world at the time they showed you the same one boy in the iron lung and that terrified the whole world how many polio cases were actually there was it really polio we do know from those first shots those injections the generation that got them all ended up with carrying a hundred simian viruses live simian viruses in the shot and simian 40 only had one function according to the maker the discoverer of the vaccine and that was to cause cancer and I also have a copy of the discussion with this particular man and his staff admitting that they knew that at

the time what they said was they thought the risks outweighed the bad benefits that might come along down the road that was the excuse since then we've been trained to accept more and more inoculations until babies now get us something like thirty inoculations before they're at the hospital when you look into the big manufacturers of inoculations like the Baxter Laboratories that were in the news recently because they sent out live flu virus along with the the bird flu virus mixed together and were caught by another country who tested it on ferrets and the ferrets all died they had done the very thing that they say that they're worried about happening in nature where the common flu is mixed with a killer flu and becomes highly contagious they actually did it by mistake we're told but go back into Baxter Laboratories even further and you find Baxter Laboratories was part of IG Farben group in World War II they were responsible for creating chemicals and so on that were used as gas and they were also used in other medical experiments on prisoners that's in the records of the choir they went on into IG Farben a good book to read is The Crimes and Punishment of IG Farben all of that stuff is documented in there all the companies the western corporations that were involved in the setting up of the Hitler regime are mentioned in that book and Baxter Laboratories the one who's coming out with all the shots were to take supposedly for the swine flu are still on

the go so when you go into see Connaught Laboratories as an example Connaught Laboratories was employed during World War II to manufacture bacterium and viruses fungus that would attack wheat and corn etc. in Germany Mr. Banting who discovered insulin the great hero Banting during World War II his main occupation was finding ways to annihilate the food supply of an entire country and he came up with ideas of creating a form of what we now call mad cow disease something that rotted the brains of the cattle for herds dairy herds and beef herds and it was manufactured in World War II and I often wonder if there really is such a thing as mad cow disease is that where it came from but I say these big laboratories and Connaught Laboratories eventually became responsible for instance for the blood supply for hospitals and hemophiliacs and byproducts of blood supply for Canada when Mr. Clinton was in power he signed a deal with some prisons in the US where the prisoners would get a dollar or two for a pound of blood and this stuff was all to be sold to Canada and almost every hemophiliac in Canada everyone who got the blood supply came down with hepatitis and various other diseases the government held a 10 year inquiry waiting until they were all pretty well dead maybe one or two survived before they paid out compensation they knew at the very beginning that this blood was contaminated and these Connaught Laboratories part of the

industrial military complex military industrial complex used in World War II buying the blood and selling it and distributing it across Canada when the CBC did a documentary on Connaught Laboratories and their role in this the little guy who purchased it was caught on the steps of his office of the building and he turned around and he said to the camera crew who questioned him on all the deaths caused in Canada thousands of them he said it's business that was the only reply given I've said for many years the biggest international corporations are real corporations but they're also front groups for one system during the Cold War for instance many books were published on the war how it would be won and so on and what they all agreed upon was those with the highest technologies would win now if you were in a free enterprise system you could never allow inventions coming out of nowhere unauthorized especially in communications and different means to be given to the general public therefore the CIA MI6 and other countries agencies created front organizations to lead the charge and control technology you could never allow free competition and technology and give it to the people without authorization it has to be permitted by those who rule that goes across the board with everything as I say from those who rule you create culture you manipulate culture you give the public what you deign to give them you suppress that which you don't want the public to have it must be under a

control you cannot have that with a true free market enterprise and true entrepreneurism you can't have it therefore you put up the front companies they're real companies they were really manufacture stuff but it's what's been authorized and guys at the top CIA MI6 fund them and run them we've seen this with different banks that were set up by CIA in the past where they funnel money to all the major wars that were fighting it was the BCCI was one of the first ones that collapsed Papa Bush was a director at one time and then he was back to being director of the CIA these were front massive banks massive corporations a difficult thing for some people to understand is what's happening today is not just an elite making a final move to take over anything every generation for hundreds of years has been brought up with the same elite's predecessors designing and running the show for each generation the elite in fact are simply moving their system into a new system an updated system to suit themselves that's a hard concept for people to grasp they've been trained to believe things are happening at the moment by happenstance by crisis coming out of nowhere and here's what we must do we must solve this problem at the time nothing is further from the truth and when people wake up they generally go through the same stages as someone who becomes bereaved when you find that democracy never existed in the first place

you go through an anger phase a depression phase you'll blame whoever is handy and then hopefully you emerge from it and you become active and you want to learn what's really going on and what has been going on but you'll also eventually come to the realization that you're up against something a system that's very very very old it's the only truly organized system on the whole planet it uses sciences that are ancient in population management it's it gave us a system of money money money is a tool that we must believe in to serve them Karl Marx was quite right he was one of their boys who was set up to set up the dialectic and he was quite right when he said that money is a tool of the elites it's essential that the people who stop bartering are working for themselves and start using money as a means of exchange which then can be taxed back from them are becoming slaves because under law and legality for thousands for a thousand years no one could take anything from you money represents your food your home everything when it's taxed back from you they're creating a form of slavery therefore it's essential that the workers believe in money the elite have all the money in the world they own all the resources in the world they don't need money but they need us to believe it's the only thing that we must use today the power of the purse as they call it at the top is being used to the maximum to tax almost everything back from the people that they earn

you tie that in with Charles Galton Darwin in his book The Next Million Years where he lays out the next few thousand years up to a million years for the elite and all the changes that will happen the grandson of Charles Darwin who again was related to the Huxleys and many others and he said we are in the process in the 1950s he said this in his own book we are in the process of creating he says slavery has always existed in one form or another there's different ways to have slavery you can either get a bunch of henchmen force a tribe into obeying you and being your slaves that's a lot of force but you have to feed them etc or you can allow them to keep so much of their earnings for themselves to maintain themselves and take off all the rest to supply the elite and the structure of the system over them but he says we are now in the process of creating a more sophisticated form of slavery in other words the general public who would drift into the system and it become natural for them would never twig on that they were actually slaves you tie that in with the institutions that the Huxleys and the Darwins belong to they're all Institute for International Affairs which has branches in every country in the world they set up the United Nations they said in their own writings from the earliest times to the present the world they're bringing in is to be a world where everyone who is born or would be allowed

to be born would be born to serve the state that would be their sole function that's if they had a job for you to fulfill or a need for you but it's a more sophisticated form of slavery and we're going through it today these families have been at this for at least at least centuries and I think much much longer why is it that the Rothschilds come onto the scene as a revolutionary family why is it that it suddenly could take over five countries with five sons create central banks or take the central banks over that already existed and why is it they're right to the present time they're in the forefront of world politics why is that why doesn't a generation of the Rothschild go off in some other direction or lose interest you're dealing here with a specific religion a religion and a cause a purpose you will only find this kind of fanatical intergenerational devotion to an agenda when there's some kind of religion involved in it when did all these families crop up with the banks we find that when the Rosicrucian court was created between Elizabeth I's court and that's open history today John Dee Francis Bacon Francis Drake all these boys were a member of the Rosicrucians it also broke out in France and Germany at the same time and even announced their presence by billboards all across Paris but the members now as I said in Britain were open in the time Queen Elizabeth I their idea was to gain gold and money through plunder and they basically

lived off of the Spanish galleons for an awful long time as the Spanish were taking the gold out of South America but John Dee and Bacon also were advisors to kings and queens and they wrote about how to control guide mislead and always fool the populations and always to to get them into warfare thinking they knew what they were fighting for but the public were never to know the true ambitions that they had John Dee coined the term the British Empire it didn't exist before he said it and wrote it down he went to the Queen with the idea and he said a system should be set up where countries are invaded or taken over by Britain to create a world system which would be based on free trade free trade it says those countries willing to adopt the British system would be given special status and its most favored nation trading status the very same terms that are now used in all the charters that draw up for free trade across the planet yet we're going back 500 years to find it first used by an advisor to Queen Elizabeth I so therefore we know there was a world plan underway we also know that Kipling for instance who worked for the British Raj in India wrote many books and was a very high freemason was sent over to the US where he spoke to the US Senate equal to equal and said we pass the torch on to you America was then to take over the financial cost of conducting this world at war basically to take over a world into a global system

I'm Alan Watt and I'm a long-term researcher into the geopolitics and the psychopolitics of a world society basically the society that is bringing in globalism in our lifetime in the 1950s a book came out called The Next Million Years and that was done by Charles Galton Darwin now the Galtons again were another special bunch that came out to do with eugenics and they started up the IQ tests that are now used across the world for school children to try and get the average intellect of children classify them in grades etc and they then intermarried with the Darwins so Charles Galton Darwin was the grandson of Charles Darwin he was a physicist again too what we're talking about is what Huxley said Huxley being the product the end product of selective breeding to get a scientist and so was Charles Galton Darwin they were bred along the platonic lines Plato talked about it too and they became the scientific class Charles Galton Darwin was a top physicist in Britain worked on atomic energy weaponry and so on but he also was attached to other delegations of the United Nations had a lot of power was well known getting a lot of exposure on political viewpoints and social viewpoints in the media and he came out with the book in the 50s called The Next Million Years The Next Million Years is an astonishing book because it's an incredible boast of how an elite would literally rule the world for another million years and how it

would be done not just could be done but would be done but his biggest cry throughout the whole book was that the media and education of systems would have to work so hard on the general public even from schooling up to get the public to go along and allow themselves to be somehow sterilized he said that the inferiors would outbreed the superiors and that was his greatest fear now he spoke on behalf of his own establishment his own group so they're into eugenics and you'll find the United States became a great laboratory for eugenical experiment people don't really realize that because when many of the Albigensian descendants the Cathar descendants the Bogomil descendants came into the United States under the guise of Christianity they set up their own particular eugenical experiments the Mormons were one of them where couples were matched up one of the greatest experiments that's ever happened in history was the Oneida experiment on Oneida New York where the man who set it up was given free reign to match up men and women not to live forever together but only to copulate for specific offspring Charles Darwin was involved in the experiment the newsletter that the Oneidas set out went to also the Huxleys H.G.

Wells came over at the latter end for visits to it as well it was one of the greatest eugenical experiments ever carried on under the protection and the guise and the rights of protection of Christianity that's how they got away with it and the man Noyes who was in charge of it was a high mason his cousin was Hayes who became the president of the States so big people were backing this experiment in eugenics through the latter part of the 1800s into the 1900s

what did they hope to gain how can we bring this into the Council on Foreign Relations and they're all Institute for International Affairs or the writings of Huxley's or Darwin's even well they believe and they believed by Darwin's time that all of the people who had the right stuff to excel in life to acquire wealth good intellect property and keep a hold of it through generations had already been born therefore anything that came after Darwin was just chance perhaps or luck therefore all the elite families were already established there would be no more elite families everyone else married in common because they did not have their wives or their husbands picked for them they

ethics and the bioethicists are saying that those people the common people have junk genes it's another slander on the public you see meaning you have all these weird erroneous genes because none of you down through the generations were specifically married up for specific reasons whereas you go into the line of the lineage

were already only breeding into one other family for generations and the Darwins for about five generations that we know of by records birth records and marriage records only married into the Wedgwood family the big pottery conglomerates and when Charles Darwin's first wife died he married his mother's sister who was a Wedgwood as well the problem with this incredibly close inbreeding and I should say too the Huxley's were also descended from Darwin too you'll find contacts there and their wives how many of these families these wealthy elite families were actually into inbreeding in this fashion this close inbreeding we'll never really know maybe one day they will publish it but I know that Ian Taylor came out with Darwin and the New World Order where he documented the lineages of at least the Darwin family to do with the Wedgwoods and as I say the unfortunate thing of such close inbreeding is you can have if there's a dominant gene there prone to specific illness or disease it tends to be passed on and I think that with genetic research they hope to

breeding for themselves but genetic research will not be used for the benefit of the rest of humanity even though it's our tax money that's going into and has been going into the research for so long how long have they been working and why have been working so long on genetics what's the reason for it all geneticists are eugenicists because it

inferior types therefore at the start of their training at university they become true believers in eugenics to begin with we've been told that the double helix and the genes and so on wasn't discovered until Watson came along around the 70s or so and that they'd always suspected that there were things called genes this was standard in old medical training for many many many years but they hadn't found them they just suspected they were told but yet if you go into the writings of the greatest mathematician that the Royal Society could produce called Rutherford he's the guy they sent off abroad to do the equations for the pyramids and so on for the Royal Society in his own memoirs he said that in the early 20s he was employed on scientific research as a mathematician to work on genes why would you need mathematicians working on genes for something you haven't discovered yet you can't see them unless they could see them and I believe that's how far ahead they truly were back then they did know the genes were there they were working on them heavily because as I say the agenda

since at least Darwin's time onwards was to create a superior type of human they toyed with the idea of creating even a superior type of worker to serve the superior class someone who could be very that's what the utopia or the utopic idea is basically based upon some of them are so arrogant like Julian Huxley who was the first CEO of UNESCO who said that UNESCO function by the way the United Nations organization for education worldwide was to create a standardized system of education across the world so that all children could be manipulated into the same thought patterns belief patterns and mentality basically a standardization process a Plato's cave that would all grow up in never knowing anything outside that cave he was quite blatant about that it was for social engineering purposes not for educational purposes as such now eugenics goes back as I say into most ancient times all kings and queens were mated up for their supposedly inherited traits as leaders and even as gods by the priesthoods who kept records of the traits the physical and mental personality traits of offspring of these unions the one thing that was lacking was a moneyed class who also used the same techniques we find this coming out with the Rothschilds family so you had monarchies running the world running an empire such as the British empire all you now was the money system to go along with it we find the Rothschilds worked on the

same principles as monarchies they married they intermarried each generations we find Benjamin Franklin very interesting man long before this again high Freemason this is in his own records at the Franklin Institute he joined the English Lodge he joined other lodges he became eventually the Grand Master of the Nine Sisters Lodge in France he initiated Voltaire as a member and others but he was also a member of the club in England Benjamin Franklin talked about the carriers he called them dollies these are women who had selective genes they were the process the products themselves of selective special breeding and the Hellfire Club like many Masonic high Masonic institutions of that time had what were loosely called loosely called and wrongly in a sense brothels attached to them but there's also a cover because the special carriers or dollies and dollies the term that Franklin himself coined is still in use today a dolly is a carrier like something you carry luggage on or whatever basically he said that those who are worthy to go on and breed with these particular women who are of noble birth most of them would have the pleasure of having the offspring knowing they had the offspring and the offspring was guaranteed a life of high exposure in science and perhaps leadership in the world Madame Bouvier was the one he was talking about initially at the Hellfire Club in High Wycombe London and Madame Bouvier's descendants still live there's two of them in France today

and the other one was Jackie Kennedy if you look at how politics is run and you go into the writings of people like Lenin for instance Lenin said there are a thousand directions and systems in which people could go and live under but the public mustn't know that he said it's important that the system that's created for them is accepted by the people so that they think that it's the only system that could possibly work and it's true we're contained in a system of left and rights supposedly the have nots against the haves or those who own the means of production against those who don't the workers and that's traditional labor versus Tory or conservative versus Democrat that's how the system is run it keeps the public contained within a system of thinking that it must be one or the other or a middle road in between which they push it never occurs to the general public that society has lived in the past under many different types of

one that could have evolved in your lifetime therefore you're contained within a restriction of parties you vote in one party when you're sick of the last one not because you want the new one in it's because you're sick of the last one and what they've done to you and once they've been corrupted and gone off in different tangents in ways where they never explained during the entire elections and nothing to do with election promises you vote them out and get the next party in and so we go on forever with this left right paradigm always think it's like a tennis match really with the public in the middle we're the ball and we go back and forth between left and right left and right left and right meanwhile we're being shepherded all along in one direction because politics is a tool of the elite to manage the public that's all democracy in fact really is a tool of the elite to contain the public manage them and guide them along a predetermined path that's outside of any kind of democracy but if you

went on board with the same agenda at the same time which shows pre-planning bureaucracies and different governments do not work that fast it takes years to get that kind of cooperation that kind of synchronicity working together and synchronization Bush's job was to bring in a totalitarian system under the guise of protecting the public where

the military forces the paramilitary forces now the police have become to set up the institutions for enforcement of laws Obama comes in takes over the institutions that are now set up and his job is to guide you through the economic depression and use those forces against the public at the required time that's how it works there is a continuity as far as I'm concerned it's not

in and Obama has proved his loyalty to them by literally allowing them to rape the public of all their funds and then rewarding them by public funding and tax money to save the same bankers he's one of their own boys but he now has the machinery in place that Bush set up to quell the coming riots that they say are going to

speeches before he was elected and I analyzed what he actually said he said very little he was giving emotive speeches with no substance he never said what he wanted to do or how he was going to do anything it was almost like a lead up to a movie that hadn't been made yet emotional talk talk of

the term that's been used in academia for the last few decades and the Ivy League schools and universities of the century of change so his slogan became and they used slogans written for him change is good any idiot should ask the simple question wait a minute what change are you talking about how can you be for change if you don't know what the change is going to be it could be for your detriment but they got the people parroting like George Orwell said with the sheep you know four legs good two legs bad change is good and the people his followers start to repeat it change is good what kind of change are we talking about the loss of sovereignty the blending into an international institution a world government system a system where

and policing the world being the policeman of the world now Obama wants to lead the charge on sustainability carbon taxes by making America the example for the rest of the world to follow he's asking everybody to sacrifice everything they have that's what he means by change is good he didn't dream up this plan he is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations again that

planned world governments using Britain based as a model for the British Empire now become the American Empire in a sense and the changes here he's talking about is a new world of servitude where you will serve the world state and you also have to pay off all your debts along the

therefore the changes he's talking about really is a new deal when you hear a new deal mentioned by any president and we got that from FDR we got it from Bush last Bush it was in a new deal we're getting it from this administration that's a legal admission a legal admission from the leader of your country of a new system a new deal is literally a new system the first system was the constitution you had an updated system with FDR as government became incredibly big and centralized and now you've got a new deal under the guise that change is good who planned the change wasn't the people who planned the change who will benefit will not be the people it's the world of sustainability Mr. Rockefeller the population reduction plan those who go on to the future will be those who are necessary for the future maintenance and those who are simply obsolete the useless eaters will have to perish and die off it's as simple as that this generation today the ones who are alive today we are the generation that's going through the biggest changes in history according to even Rockefeller himself since the industrial revolution it's the end of one part one phase of a long term plan and out of this comes a new world order as said Mr.

Brown said the Prime Minister of Great Britain said at the G20 meeting recently it's a new world order a different order from the previous one where people technically technically were working for themselves would choose their unemployment and so on the new world order is a planned system a planned economy a planned population so it's up to us it's not up to the next generation to change this we're the only ones who can possibly do the changing and it's either really the rights to go into an uncertain future future future which which what life should really be where we decide for ourselves we want to go individually and collectively or allow ourselves to be dumb animals creatures who are guided by those who have decided they are the masters of our

did and enjoy their bosses running the world for them but it's up to those who like freedom personal freedom which also entails uncertainty of where we're actually going to go these video interviews have all